Charlie Kirk Prove Me Wrong

Absolutely do this

Libs would have a meltdown if you took away their shrine to a career criminal.

Conservatives would have a meltdown if you took away their shrine to a career child rapist

No evidence of that. Reported for spreading hate and libeling a public figure.

Why George Floyd?

You mean why the career criminal and dug addict who died from a drug overdose?

I thought he was killed via police brutality

No. He was framed by the hate-filled Left wanting to make political points. The knee on the throat position was not only taught in the city's police academy as a subduing tactic but in every major city police academy in the nation and the carefully selected leftist hanging judge refused to allow the defense to present that to the court room.

Oh damn :(

That subduing tactic was never taught to be held for 8.5 minutes nor the one that it was utilized on be left there without medical attention after they will rendered unconscious and quite possibly dead.

The police chief who testified against him by saying what he did wasn't standard procedure had pics of her from years before that showed her being taught the exact same move at boot camp, so that's a hoax. Plus the fact he started saying he couldn't breathe BEFORE the cop arrested him. Not to mention that there were two autopsies, one independent, one paid for by Floyd's family. One of them said he OD'd, the other said it was police brutality. Guess which one was used as evidence and which one wasn't.

One did not say he OD'd. That's a hoax.

Just as the Hunter Biden Laptop was a hoax? Just as Biden's dementia was a hoax? Just as the COVID lab leak was a hoax? At this point, I just assume that anything that helps the left and hurts the right is either twisted or an ACTUAL hoax.

Actually it was just like you said it it was a hoax, no Red Herrings necessary.

Would you like me to quote you or will simply scrolling up to your own comment suffice?

btw, for the record, there are plenty of dic pics from Hunter Biden's Laptop™ that prove it wasn't a hoax, Old Pappy Biden had to step out of the race because his dementia was not a hoax, and Covid, well, pangolin dong tea is not a hoax either.

I understand that reality isn't as cute and glittery as a nice hoax conspiracy whatev, but that doesn't mean it's a bad thing.

Almost forgot, that hoax you just referred to is an actual copy of the actual official Hennepin County Medical Examiner report, the one that you falsely claimed said he OD'd.

I reckon some hoaxes are hoaxes after all, as by design, eh?

Yeah, the Hunter Biden story's not considered a hoax NOW, but the mainstream media said it was during the election season. Biden was constantly being portrayed as "being sharper than he ever was" until they simply couldn't pretend anymore, despite his cognitive decline being obvious years ago. The COVID lab leak was covered up for the simple reason that the guy they hired to make a vaccine also has ties to the lab near where the first COVID outbreak was, so they blamed it on a simple misfortune where a virus jumped from one species to another.

You know what WAS a hoax? Russiagate. Recently released FBI documents showed that, while there was evidence of the Russians trying to influence the 2012 election, there was absolutely no evidence that Trump was colluding with them, nor was there any evidence of the Russians actually succeeded with election interference. But in spite of that, they pushed the narrative that Trump is a Russian asset while showing falsified documents.

And if you don't believe it, then ask yourself this. Would the government not lie if it benefited itself? Would someone in power not try to use that power to make sure their party remained in power? Would someone in power not falsify evidence if they think they can get away with it?

And he keeps pumping the Red Herring hoaxes fanfic.

How is it that somebody from the Netherlands is actually keeping with St Petersburg crafted MAGA lines over reality? Oh, wait, I just said how.

But we digress.
Distraction/dodge sess over. Show me the coroner's report where it said George Floyd died from an overdose of drugs.

I'll wait.

Unfortunately, the report I read where he died of OD got deleted a long time ago, and whenever I try to look for it I just get cases where the fentanyl and a pre-existing heart condition only contributed to his death. That said, what the cop did to him was nothing that isn't taught at the police academy, as even the cop that testified against him had images leaked where she did the exact same thing.

And how does someone keep believing proven liars like CNN? Oh, I know, because you're afraid that people like you constantly shouting "racist" or "Nazi" to the point these words are starting to lose their meaning are wrong. And if you're wrong, that means that you're not the good person you think you are.

Is it possible I'm wrong? Possibly, I don't entirely dismiss that option. And if I do end up seeing something that convinces me I'm wrong, I'll happily admit to it. Thing is, I've seen so many lies from the leftist dominated mainstream media that I simply cannot believe news sites like CNN or our own NOS whenever they say something negative about the right or something positive about the left, with the reverse being true with the much rarer right-wing news like Fox. If Fox says something bad about Trump, or if CNN says something good about any Republican, I'd believe it much quicker than if it were the other way around.

My gosh, the dog ate it excuse.

You never read such a report because you made it up.

Heads up, you can post all the Strawman and Red Herrings you you want, I ain't reading them anymore. They're a little bit lackluster with low entertainment value.

Yes, he was.

Part of it may have been the toxic substance he was under, part of it may have been the subduing method. But we can't deny that racism-fuelled police brutality is a big problem in the US. Even over here in the UK, it's pretty bad, even though it's not as severe in the US.

George Floyd's medical report

Oh, okay

Yup. Can't argue with the facts.

Thing is, he's been under the influence many a time. No need to wonder too hard what made the difference that time.

Fentanyl is an extremely dangerous substance, and taking even a little more than your previous dose could prove fatal. Not to mention that addictions rewrite your brain to make you want more and more. Combine that with the FACT Floyd was an addict, and it wouldn't be too far fetched to say he bit off a little more than he could take.

I'm having flashbacks of Health Class in freshman year high school. Years before fentanyl was a thing, of course.

Guess you missed the chapter in which addicts develop tolerance to their drug(s) of choice.

Guess you missed the chapter about how damage build up over time. And that's assuming an addict's constant chaise for the next high doesn't outpace them building up their resistances. Hell, the fact they're constantly getting stronger and stronger stuff is partially BECAUSE of their increased resistance to the high that drugs bring.

Wish I came up with that one.
Oh, that's right, I did.

Here's a copy of the official original Hennepin County Medical Examiner report for your perusal. That's the first one, in case there's any confusion. Although one thing that does confuse me is the OD part, as I cannot find it.

Why?

George Floyd had multiple criminal convictions and did nothing to deserve a statue. Charlie Kirk on the other hand, never resorted to violence during his debates, and often, his opponents tried to assault him before they finally decided to kill him. If you watched Charlie's videos you would have noticed that he never walked over to people asking them to debate; he left them come to HIM. The people he debated didn't have to be there, they could have left whenever they wanted. The left didn't like that, so they decided to kill him.

You also notice that when Charlie Kirk died, people saying hymns and put flowers on his grave. In contrast, when George Floyd died, there were massive riots and people burned stuff down.

When George Floyd died, there were also lots of peaceful protests that had no violence at all. You're just conveniently ignoring that to suit your narrative.

Doesn't look very peaceful to me.

Because most definatly charlies civil rights were violated by a police force.....