Ironically Marxism actually creates the kind of income inequality its supposed to prevent.

After what Jesus did it comes down to this - "There are no Jew or Gentile. No slave or free man. NO RICH OR POOR."

Of course that is about giving everyone an equal shot at Redemption and Forgiveness before it's too late.

However can it be applied to other things like social standing, the life one is stuck in, etc. The duty of the Haves should be to help the Have Nots, not by sacrificing everyhing they(Haves) own but to find ways to lift up the Haves Not with things like better schools and education and of course creating businesses that can provide the Have Nots with a job.

I find it interesting the Haves among the Dems/Leftists aren't exactly providing any of that to the Have Nots even though they have the influence and money to do so.

That is true, we must forgive one another equally.

We are born with equal opportunities ahead of us. We are (or should be) equal under the law. But after that, in a free society there is no equality. In an authoritarian society equality is achieved be taking liberty away.

True on forgiveness.

What the Preamble of the Constitution states - All men are created equal.

Obvious what the Founders meant was, "All men are created equal under God(Creator as they put it)."

Exactly. The goal of the socialist left is to make everyone equal in everything including property and earnings. That can only ever happen if the individual is deprived of their inalienable rights.

Equal people are never free and free people are never equal.

In a free society if several people line for a race there will only be one winner. In a socialist society everyone who participated wins. It doesn't matter how much you trained you still are just one of the winners.

Which goes against the Bible which states - "All that property and stuff you own? Doesn't matter in the long run. Can't take it with you. Also when Jesus returns for good it all becomes a giant moot point that will be forgotten."

The duty of the haves is to voluntarily help the have nots. There's an important distinction there. Charity is not forced. Charity must and can only be done voluntarily otherwise it's not charity. If its not voluntary it is redistribution of wealth which is accomplished by stealing from those whose produce wealth and giving to those who do nothing. Well.... almost nothing. They do vote Democrat because they don't want that "free" money to stop. Because then they'll have to put some effort into earning that money. It's much easier for them to be parasites, like the government, and be a burden on us slaves.

And you're exactly right. Statistics don't lie. Dems, libs and any other leftist rarely give charity. Everyone on the right gives far more to help the needy than any Democrat ever will. I think Dems think forced wealth redistribution is what works, even though welfare has spent trillions of taxpayer dollars and have absolutely nothing to show for it. Poverity hasn't decreased in the slightest since welfare was enacted.

Yes. As the Bible state - Charity is part free will to do the act and being a joyous giver. The former is obvious, the latter is about trying to give hope in what appears to be hopeless situation.