Harry Callahan

https://youtu.be/mqYPyNWuYTk?si=8L6lPilbWgbQXRTE

How do you know they weren't firebombing a bunch of pedophiles and you saved the pedophiles?

Believe it or not, wl, even pedophiles have a right to due process. I guess the left just loves ignoring the Constitution based on convenience, hey?

Weren't you just defending the Trump's administrations attempts to not provide due process to immigrants just a few weeks ago? Yeah, sure was.

It's amazing how y'all lack self-awareness.

Maybe. I don't remember whatever you're referring to. And in true typical fashion, the left makes a point or claims something, without offering any substance to back it up.

But for the sake of our friendly discussion, let's stipulate that I did say whatever you think I said.

Since you clearly only remember what you want about whatever I say, there's zero point in explaining to you the difference between US citizens and illegal aliens, particularly those who have committed violent, despicable crimes beyond entering our country illegally.

I'm fully self aware of what my views are regarding immigration, and why I hold those view. That's self awareness.

It's those on the left who shift from position to position on the same fundamental issue, then make ridiculous claims about others' lack of self-awareness.

That's the very definition of not being self-aware.

I'm not going to go back through your timeline but anything you've posted about Abrego Garcia has to be deported without trial is you promoting Anti-American and anti-Constitution - specifically about Due Process.

that's what I'm talking about. Right now you're all "DUE PROCESS, LIBERALL!!!!!! EVEN PEDOS GET IT!!!!!" But just a few weeks ago y'all were "DEPORT HIM AND ALL OF THEM RIGHT NOW! NO TRIALS FOR IMMIGRANTS!!!!!!!!"

The only consistent ideology you have is "own the libs." That's it. That's why you can take the position of "due process for everyone" with a straight face today but a few weeks ago you said "immigrants don't get due process" with just as straight face.

that's why you think you're being consistent. Even though what you're saying now is the opposite of what you were saying weeks ago. Because for you, you are being consistent. Whatever the libs say is wrong, and y'all will automatically take the opposite position. EVEN IF that current position is the exact opposite of what you said hours/days/weeks/months ago.

Newsflash: he’s not a Delaware man.

Oh, and I see you, of course, completely ignored my comment about the inanity... and inane it was.

Why do you even bother making comments like that? I may disagree with you politically, but you're seemingly a lot smarter than the average liberal. Maybe I just expect too much from someone I think has a bit on the ball? Yep, that's probably it.

Think of it like the Socratic method. I am asking a question to prompt a discussion

Sure, that’s what you’re trying to do. But what you’re really doing is ignoring a very simple question. That’s a typical tactic of someone who cannot support what they’ve stated.

And maybe you can explain to everyone why the left only cares about due process for illegals, when it's Trump, but not Obama?

This is from leftist propaganda outlet Snopes, so you know they're going to do everything they can to make Trump look as bad as possible and Obama look as good as possible.

And this is the best they could make Obama look?

In that case, imagine how bad it really was for due process under Obama!

Just a correction: all illegals deported have had a judicial removal order on them. In other words they already had their due process.

Wait… Snopes needs a correction!?

Hard to imagine!

All joking aside, that’s a very good point. Thanks for making it, but of course the left absolutely does not care. The more facts they can ignore while assaulting Trump, the better in their eyes.

The context literally explains it to you. You answered your question with your visual aide. They followed the law.

Hilarious. What the left tolerates from their leaders relative to what they use to attack Trump, only exposes libtard hypocrisy.

I want you to take a moment to contrast your position here with what you're saying about Garcia in the other thread.

Here you're arguing that even pedophiles deserve due process. And I agree. They do. Everyone does.

YET

You're also arguing with me that Garcia doesn't deserve due process because he's..."not a Delaware man." I disagree- he does deserve Due Process because it's in the Constitution.

You are saying that the Constitution needs to be followed, even for pedophiles, and at the same time you're saying that the Constitution does not need to be followed because he's an immigrant.

And you don't see the contradiction because for you, it isn't. It's entirely consistent. Because it's consistent with your single ideology. You don't care about American democracy. You don't care about the Rule of Law and the Constitution. You care about one thing.

Own. The. Libs.

That's it. That's why you can take up a position (due process for pedophiles) and then immediately abandon it without any sense of hypocrisy or contradiction (no due process for immigrants).

it's the same for most of conservatives and especially for MAGA. Y'all taxation is theft YET you'll say that the tariffs (a tax) are good for the country and everyone needs to be willing to pay it.

A tax that outpaces inflation, which makes things even more expensive. Yet the same people said that inflation was so so so so important and things need to be cheaper.

Or how there needs to be a balanced budget and lower the deficit YET vote for same politicians who explode the deficit and budget every time SINCE THE 1950S.

That's why you can't see the difference between the Obama & Biden administration deporting people and the Trump administration doing it.

Relevance?

Aside from that a little thing called “DUE PROCESS.”

Right. You shooting people for fire bombing stuff is you ignoring 'DUE PROCESS'.

When you see someone in the act, it doesn’t take a law degree to know they’re guilty.

The legalty of an act to save the lives of others in imminent danger (or your own life) has significant -SIGNIFICANT- legal precedence.

Nobody cried "due process!" when the would be Trump assassin was shot and killed.

Oddly enough, liberals didn't seem to care much about Luigi Mangone ignoring "due process" and choosing to execute someone he had been radicalized into believing was an enemy.

(by the way you've earned a long-overdue follow on here)

So... 'Due Process' is you deciding what is or isn't legal and that you get to kill someone based on your decision?

that sounds like the Rule of Law to you?

If someone’s throwing a petrol bomb on you, would you want me to get him a lawyer before trying to stop him?