ALL JUDGES are this. These powers they claim to have simply do not exist in the US Constitution. Where does it say SCOTUS can declare something (un)constitutional? Where does it say any judge anywhere can play 'backseat legislator' against the executive or legislative branches?
Mark Levin said it best the other day about this kind of thing - The purpose of the judicial branch is to make sure the executive and legislative branches stay in their own lanes.
Basically whenever the executive or legislative tries to stick their hands into each other's cookie jar, then the judicial branch is to slap that hand away. It's like when those idiot dem(s) went down to El Salvador to get that MS-13 gang banger back. The court should've flat out said legislators can't do this kind of thing because foreign affairs is the pleasure of the executive branch, not the legislative branch. Whether that gang banger was in the US legally or not or committed any crimes on US soil had nothing to do with it.