There's a difference

You mean when some people were let into the capital by police and toured? I fully endorse the prosecution of anyone that caused violence or death, as well as vandalism, but the rest of them earned their pardons because they failed to give them a speedy trial, destroyed evidence, tampered with witnesses etc...etc...

Almost everyone waives their right to a speedy triial...or prosecution will RUN OVER THEM,.so your details are flawed...

Nah bro 4 years before even having the option to waive.

Think about that. How would it be speedy after 4 years?

Here is some help in understanding wjat the waiver means...".many January 6th defendants have waived their right to a speedy trial, with attorneys advising this to allow for adequate time to prepare a strong defense. "

If they did not waive the right...they wouod have already went to trial and lost....like all of them that have seen a judge....so you have that to claim as bullshit.

Also you didn't address the other 2 things that I brought up: destroying evidence and tampering with witnesses.

Destroyed evidence of a tour? What evidence? It was a tour sanctioned by the capital police....right?

They destroyed evidence. Look it up. It's on record.

So...it is documented. Your next move is to say no one is doing anything about it. Right? Why not follow throguh and file a lawsuit? I wonder why MYPILLOW HASNT FUNDED THIS DEFENSE? Come one man.....are you serious that you claim you see something that no other "lawyer" sees?

They kept the record of the evidence that was destroyed?

Like, what is this, the Epstein files, where the list they were calling for gets released but they redacted the parts like Trump's destinations after flying aboard the Epstein Lolita jet?
I reckon they read between the lines on that one, because we haven't been hearing about that list since the week of its release.

The destroyed evidence is on record that it was evidence and it was destroyed? Really?