There's a difference

You mean when some people were let into the capital by police and toured? I fully endorse the prosecution of anyone that caused violence or death, as well as vandalism, but the rest of them earned their pardons because they failed to give them a speedy trial, destroyed evidence, tampered with witnesses etc...etc...

Nah bro 4 years before even having the option to waive.

Source? Pretty sure that never happened.

The source is the courts.

Source? What are you talking about? It is the rule of law. Is your reply an actual attempt at being genuine?

I want a source for your quote. Everyone knows you lefties constantly lie. If you said the sky was blue I'd have to go outside and check that it didn't turn green or something.

No charge.....so you take the quote you want to search, cut it, paste it into Goolge.....viola....

No poopoo on the source as you pick and choose when they are a viable source....

Also you didn't address the other 2 things that I brought up: destroying evidence and tampering with witnesses.

Destroyed evidence of a tour? What evidence? It was a tour sanctioned by the capital police....right?

They destroyed evidence. Look it up. It's on record.

So...it is documented. Your next move is to say no one is doing anything about it. Right? Why not follow throguh and file a lawsuit? I wonder why MYPILLOW HASNT FUNDED THIS DEFENSE? Come one man.....are you serious that you claim you see something that no other "lawyer" sees?

Because it was destroyed by congress. Please educate yourself.

They kept the record of the evidence that was destroyed?

Like, what is this, the Epstein files, where the list they were calling for gets released but they redacted the parts like Trump's destinations after flying aboard the Epstein Lolita jet?
I reckon they read between the lines on that one, because we haven't been hearing about that list since the week of its release.

Nope. Trump was never on the jet. Why do you gotta lie like that?

The pilot of the 'Lolita Express' testified during Ghislaine Maxwell's trial that Trump was a frequent flyer. This was years before any of the Epstein list were even released, which also showed Trump's name as a frequent flyer.

Why do you gotta lie so much?

That log evidence was not destroyed.
However, the last list released had redacted the destination of Trump's flights. That's why nobody's making any more demands about seeing them.

Nope. Try again, this time with truth, facts, and reason

The destroyed evidence is on record that it was evidence and it was destroyed? Really?

Yes. It was entered into the record.

no

Please do some research before responding.

Post it

I'll wait