JFK? Now do Epstein

I agree. Kash Patel issued Pam Bondi a deadline for release for the countless pages of Epstein files confiscated from the fired NY City FBI director. So let's see what happens next.

What I don't get is why there is a 'national security' aspect to the E List. I mentioned that elsewhere and the reply was "important foreign dignitaries and maybe even leaders of countries may be on the list."

My reply to that was, "I don't care. We already know about Prince Andrew. Nobody on the list gets to be exempted."

The only reason national security should be used for the E List is because these scumbags were also trading/selling top secret information to each other.

I agree. If they were poking things where they did not belong then let's reveal everything to the world. Then if THEIR people want to sanction child sexual slavery then so be it. But let's let them KNOW it first.

I wonder why....

Here's my take. JFK is ancient history. It's interesting, but the Epstein list is current events. And it's not just about who is on the list, but about the political and financial influence they might have exerted. For example, yes, Prince Andrew is on the list. The more important thing is: what was Andrew blackmailed into doing? Who did he have to pressure, and for what purposes? Gates? Zuck? The OG Twitter owner? Bill Clinton? What were they blackmailed into doing?

Perhaps current events need to be put into better understanding and context for the average person who isn't paying attention, doesn't know much, and for the libs/Dems willing to listen up, before the grand finale of the Epstein client list/mass arrests/corrupt system brought down can happen. I'm sure more will come out over the next weeks/months that will lead up to present day.

I agree.

Finally, something everybody can agree on

Indeed