Baby girls have rights too, even inside the womb

↑Congratulations on 200 thousand points, well earned with great memes like this.↑

or man

Good point. Thank you for making that point.

Why the f**k would someone throw away a smol human growing inside them anyway?!

There are many reasons. Almost all unwanted pregancies can be avoided by abstaining from sex (rape being an obvious exception). And if a woman does get raped and can't care for a baby herself, she can give it up for adoption.

Also, not all women who have abortions want them, but they have them because their parents or.husbands/boyfriends coerced them to.

Some people say "What if the pregnancy endangers the mother's life?", but only 1 in 100,000 pregnancies are like that. One example of a pregnancy that endangers the mother's life is an ectopic pregnancy. That's when a fertilized egg gets stuck in the fallopian tube, ovary, abdomen or cervix instead of the uterus where it should be. The fetus can't turn into a baby, and will eventually die, but it's a live-threatening situation for the mother who could bleed to death. If only there was some way we could save the baby in an ectopic pregnancy.

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/9687-ectopic-pregnancy

Also, if a woman wants sex but no kids, why doesn’t she either have the guy use protection or just simply have her reproductive organs removed so she can’t get pregnant with a child she doesn’t want?

Need to be able to give you upvotes times infinity

I am dirty minded

They are POTETIONAL beings who are just fertilized eggs with no brain activity while the mother is already human. Also, do you not care about the life of the woman giving birth herself? What if she is having complications with an unhealthy baby that is dying which would kill her as well or was raped? You are also stripping the baby girl's rights when she grows up by taking away this form of healthcare. Also, I am sure you will be saying different if we are talking about dying animals that are about to give birth to dead babies and are in need of an abortion or else she will also die.

According to the Guttsmacher Institute (look it up), all the hypothetical scenarios you cite occur is less than 2% (last time I looked) of all abortions performed in the United States. The other 98% of abortions are performed on heathy mothers carrying healthy children that were conceived consensually.

Leaving aside the egregious suggestion that a child should be made to pay the ultimate price for a crime committed by their paternal parent, how about I grant you the whole of that 2%, and then you can agree that the other 98% have a right to their life? No? Yeah, I didn't think so.

This argument about the threshold at which life begins is both spurious and subjective. Ninety-nine times out of a hundred, that threshold, wherever you arbitrarily put it, will be crossed providing Planned Parenthood (or whomever) keeps their butcher knives off of it.

You leftist just love to talk about civil rights for the disenfranchised, but when it comes to the most disenfranchised and voiceless group of human beings in existence, you're not only silent, you actually advocate for a "woman's right" to sacrifice a fellow human being on the altar of convenience.

Thank you for backing me up and defending me before I even realized that I was under attack. I really appreciate that. The best quote you gave is:

"You leftist just love to talk about civil rights for the disenfranchised, but when it comes to the most disenfranchised and voiceless group of human beings in existence, you're not only silent, you actually advocate for a "woman's right" to sacrifice a fellow human being on the altar of convenience."

I couldn't have said it better myself.

Enjoy the rest of your day.

I stand beside you & tombstone. 👍

YEAH, Tombstone! That’s what I’m talkin’ about!
I get the impression you’re out there on the frontlines with us, in front of PP.
Good work brother !

It can also be because the mother couldn't take care of the children and she is in a state where she is unable to care for the child and doesn't want them to be put in the adoption center to suffer not having a parent. So, it's almost like you only care about fetuses during birth and never when they actually develop to full on human beings and then are suffering and having to get adopted or have a mother struggling to survive with the children making it harder when taking away abortion. They are literally just bundles of cells when in early stages of the womb and are only fertilized eggs getting removed. It's like putting down a dying animal when needed except it's just a egg with no brain activity. We are talking about the mother's well being vs a bunch of cells. Not to mention, countless sperm dies when masturbating. Sperms are also living things so if an egg that had been fertilized and is in stages of having very little activity and also not caring with whatever you are going to have this necessary health care performed or not is considered life, then I guess billions of sperms ready to merge with eggs to become human would also be life making it so that masturbating for men should also be illegal as well.

There are dozens of safe and effective forms of contraception available, at the cost of a pittance if not entirely free. If you don't want to get pregnant, maybe you should avail yourself of one of them.

You keep talking about the unborn as if they're not human and thus not entitled to civil rights, while conveniently ignoring the POINT; Whenever you think a fetus becomes a human being, if you let it alone, it WILL reach that point.

The same cannot be said of the component parts (sperm and eggs), and I really can't believe I'm even responding to such an utterly ludicrous argument.

The next time you compare abortion to "putting down a dying animal", you should look into the works of Heinrich Himmler, because you sound just like him.

I’m glad you’re taking care of the bums.
And… doing a great job!

Don't forget unwanted pregnancy. Besides, there are complications in birth and you can't just choose not to have those when you DO want to get pregnant. Also, that's the point of abortion, it's to remove the baby early so it doesn't feel much pain and is removed before it becomes an actual human so that the mother experiencing complications doesn't die.

Unwanted pregnancy happens because irresponsible people don't use contraception.

The "complications" argument was addressed in one of my above posts that you obviously didn't read.

Yeah… it’s hard to penetrate a thick skull.

They are more common than they appear
Also, it's the amount reported and let's not let numbers on graphs undermine the fact that there will always be complications and rape so abortions should be legal to help the mother in all of those cases.

Whether the numbers are actual or merely representative is irrelevant to the original question; If one were to allow for those "complications and rape" abortions, would you then agree that all the rest of the "healthy and consensual" abortions should not be allowed?

If not, then your argument is fallacious.

In conclusion, anyone who thinks they have the right to decide if someone should die simply because they don't meet some arbitrary and subjective definition of "human" are among history's most egregious bigots.

Hear hear.
Now all we can do is pray for these people.