Breaking News: Book Learning Doesn't Turn You Gay!

I'm I'm I'm
Me me me

World is bigger than that.

Although you may very well be telling the truth, I do not believe you had no content access online, or in school (if not home schooled), or somewhere from someone.

You did not spontaneously create the terms you used to describe yourself.

Some people are born predisposed, some are groomed into the lifestyle choice, some are abused and choose the lifestyle as a defense mechanism, some are situationally homosexual, such as inmates, and many other reasons, all choices.

It is unconscionable to argue for distributing these types of books to children that are not your own.

That is a solely parenting decision and the insiduous usurpation of parental authority must be stopped and prevented.

The book is no different than an adult that is not the child's parent whispering in the child's ear.

Many gay couple parents are against this practice.

Why do you suppose that is?

Just because a child asks a question it does not obligate an answer.

Age appropriateness matters.

I was homeschooled and computers were not as fancy back then, and when we did get internet it was closely monitored.

I got the term "Bi" for myself once in high school but not from any classes or teachers, and I learned the definition of "Pan" in college.

I was home schooled until high school

Probably a lot on picking up chicks
and changing your own oil I figure
(I mean 2 Dads and all)

Next somebody will say child porn doesn't make one a pedophile or create the overwhelming desire to act on their depravity.

My question, not advocating for this:

Why are there no books describing heterosexual sexual acts being demanded put on school library shelves?

Is that "normie" junk too icky and disgusting?

The correct answer - for children, yes it is.

8bfptw.gif (click to show)

Why not wait till the kid is of appropriate age to teach about gender and sex?

Then there is no need for all the confusion and frustration...especially with gay penguin daddy books, ridiculous nonsense.

Children's curiosity is very fragile and doesn't require coerced ideology nonsense...that is abuse in itself.

95hjiq.gif (click to show)

Your cartoon reference is not doing your perspective any justice.

Because a mother makes a phrase like that after viewing her infant child interacting with another...that qualifies as open game, to subject the child to gender and sexual learning?

Furthermore, when a parent does make that phrase, it is pertaining to the up and coming appropriate dating years in life.

Question about your cartoon:

Do you see the infant female child as a "lady"?

Normalcy is always age-appropriate to pass-on

Well, being gay (or bi, or pan) is normal too. It's about as common, and just as normal as being blue-eyed or left-handed.

Are you suggesting that we call all children "it" or "they" until they reach puberty? Sounds radical, but maybe a tad confusing.

What?...I never suggested calling children it or they.

You call the child by his or her name.

Why would a children's book have a penguin with 2 dads, anyway? Two "male" penguins will never make a penguin. ~just sayin'

Ooh, sounds like you haven't read it. It's non-fiction, and really sweet.

So your porn wasn’t LGBTQIA+
Big deal