If she has done nothing wrong why does she need a blanket pardon!

If you destroyed evidence you would be charged with the crimes of destruction of evidence and obstruction of justice at a minimum.

Unless you're Democrat. Hillary got away with it too.

Ah, yes, Hillary

This group is extremely effed up. The Biden administration has used the FBI to raid houses to find documents incriminating Hunter with the purpose of burying them. Hillary took hammers and destroyed telephones with evidence of her crimes. Biden pardoned Hunter for egregious crimes just bc he was lucky enough to be the president's son (if Trump did this with one of his children we wouldnt hear the end of it from the media, but it wont happen bc Trump's children are all sane). Heck, Obama wiretapped into the Trump campaign with intent of using it against him for Hillary.

All I mentioned was things they've done since Trump got involved in politics, and theres much more before and during his political campaigns. Yet these same ppl try to claim he's trying to evade the law. Biden tweeted "no one is above the law" in response to Trump's conviction, only to basically say "eff that" when his son got convicted. And Hunter's conviction is legit. Trump's was completely made up. They threw it together last second and it was obvious the court was meant to waste his campaign time and funds. And seriously, if we can convict people for paying hush money to ppl who have openly said they werent a victim, then there should definitely be court cases against presidents using the FBI to cover up dirt on their rogue son, or using the FBI to raid their opponent's house while armed, looking for incriminating evidence. But, i guess the Bidens are "no one" because they certainly have been above the law since 2021.
The Dems are so shameless that they just simply do illegal things and then persecute Trump by accusing him of doing everything they themselves do, and it's obvious enough to look up.

Eight years ago, I never thought I would say this about any person or group of people, but I would actually prefer Bernie Sanders to be president rather than anyone involved in this pack of crime syndicate mafia clowns.

I do not doubt that some of The People's Hero, Donald J Trump's, motivation is self serving.

Who wouldn't?

However, the Biden administration seemed hell bent on letting the American people know that the government has it's knee on their necks and that there is nothing the people can do about it.

yeah exactly. Hierarchy is always rigged so that the people in power will face extreme temptation to rig the game for themselves at the expense of the people. So, knowing that, I wouldn't usually trust anyone in the government. America was an idea that was supposed to try to minimize that to the best of our ability (by abolishing absolute monarchies [something the Dems seem hellbent on restarting these days]), but there really is no way to be completely rid of it unless you live in an anarchy, which is impossible to do well because people are corrupt. If all people could self-govern and we could trust everyone to be decent, anarchy would be the best way to run something. But that's an unrealistic pipedream bc people are self centered just like the government, bc the gov is full of people. Many of us would claim to have the best interests of the ppl in mind if we were to ever get into power, but also many ppl would immediately ditch that sentiment if a billion dollars were shoved in their face. People are desperate and selfish. That's how Diddies and Epsteins end up happening.

The reason I am more inclined to trust Trump particularly is because I also know that there are powerful people with their pockets in both parties, and neither party has had any interest in displeasing those ppl bc those people have a ton of cultural influence and if one party fought for the american people over these specific rich people, they'd withdraw all support and that would mean advertising and public support would become lopsided for the other side. All the networks would despise them (sound familiar?) and they would be desperate to keep him (or her) far away from the WH, whether by making supporting him taboo, or by any means necessary (also sound familiar?).

The way they've treated Trump from the moment they knew he was serious was a very serious indicator that something was amiss. All the news stations and public figures adored him before he ran, and some of them stayed friends while he was running in the primary bc they thought he was a joke (or in the case of Joe Scarborough, he thought he could woo Trump into picking him as VP). And they all changed their tune when they realized he wasn't a joke.

These two do not show many characteristics of selfish power hungry narcissists who just want power for the sake of it.

Tbh anyone who had that tendency would never run as a Republican now bc it means the media and Hollywood and the music industry and several billionaires will all be against you instead of for you. If you really wanted power for the sake of it, running as a Dem will get you blatant public media backing to the point where they'll cover for you (like they did for kamala) and attack your opponents. If you really wanted power, you'd go the route that is less risky, bc you're banking on the ppl trusting the public media that's been bought and paid for, meaning that your supporters are blindly supporting you and anything wrong you do can be covered up by their source of information.

Trump went the other way - the way of beating the media, which was incredibly risky and could have cost him his life. #1, if he does something wrong, the media will most definitely not cover for him bc they hate him. And #2, if he failed to beat it, there's no limit to what they could do to him. Nobody was surprised that ppl tried to assassinate him given what they've been saying about him. Ppl are paranoid bc of them. A percentage of the country would probably support the government ordering his execution. (also reading about how he wants to clear corruption out of the government, they're going to probably continue to try killing him).

The way of beating the media was a completely stupid idea if all he wanted was unquestioned power (and given that he's recovered from a bankruptcy and is a billionaire, I dont think anyone who knows anything about him thinks he actually that stupid). But if he actually was trying to beat a bunch of corruption, his path makes a lot more sense. As JD Vance once said, Trump's positions on things make a lot more sense if you know the media and government are corrupt.

This makes me think these ppl feel threatened by him bc they know their advantages will come to an end bc Trump has the interest of the American ppl first. This is likely why they've tried to smear him, arrest him, raid his house, even ppl have shot him (and the government can't even get into the shooters' phones, either [which is mad sus and suggests they weren't working alone, but that's a different topic]). They have hated him from the very beginning of his tenure. I remember in 2017 he set up a website where people could directly petition for something to be signed, and if a majority of the nation made a petition to him, he'd sign the thing they wanted into law. And some corrupt people tried to upend that and use it to get him kicked out of office. You'd think that would make people excited that the POTUS is actually listening to the people, but not these ppl.

And Elon is another person who I think is rare and actually cares about benefitting people, and for a few reasons. First, he did not have to buy Twitter by any means (it actually cost him a lot of money, and bc of site bots at the time, he was most definitely getting the bad side of the deal, and he knew that). Rich businessmen don't usually do something that costs them tens of billions of dollars and isn't guaranteed to give them anywhere near the same amount of income. (Now he does have a lot of money, but keep in mind, this was not long after Biden's inauguration and everyone's net worth was plummeting [including Bezos, Gates, etc.], so if our economy kept tanking, this could've cost him dearly). But on Joe Rogan, he said one of the reasons he bought Twitter was because free speech was getting destroyed on every platform and he wanted to do something about it (and that probably saved this election, bc the left couldn't blatantly censor things like they did in 2020 bc they no longer had a monopoly on social media). So he gave away money to a cause he believed would help everyone.

And both Trump and Elon were living fine lives before getting into politics. Ever since they've involved themselves, they've gotten hate and both have had 2 attempts on their lives in 2024. Yet they keep fighting. Selfish narcissists would not try to get into slightly better situations if it put their lives at stake. In fact, Trump's Mar-a-lago mansion is actually higher class than the WH is. If they just were after power, they'd influence politics quietly with their money, like many other billionaires.

Socialism is great until you add the humans

LMAOO FR

BERNIES 1 of them, just lower level

I think Bernie is upper echelon - he's in the senate where all of the laws are made and all of the money is paid.

😄 A socialist with multiple homes worth millions of dollars. Go figure.

Fr

Yeah he's definitely problematic and is someone I would want nowhere near the WH. But even he doesn't seem to be as openly blatant as these ppl. You know that "border bill" Kamala and Walz kept talking about "we tried to solve the border crisis but Trump told all his congress buddies to kill it"? That bill wasn't going to solve anything. It was going to let more immigrants in, but they just claimed it was a solution. Even Bernie and several Democrats voted against it. Those don't sound like "Trump's friends" to me.

So,
she'll be pardoned as well ?

Nah they didn't even bother to investigate her, they instead arrested someone for trying to start an investigation 💀

That,
or her mouth is filled with Bill

And the leftovers of all his abuse victims 💀

Was Liz the pick of House Minority leader Kevin McArthy for this unconstitutional "committee" ?

What difference does that make?

Oh, it might make a slight difference for Hageman and Darin LaHood:

2/4/22
Republican Party officials on Friday voted to punish GOP Reps. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger for their work on the House committee...
...The censure resolution (accurately identifies) Kinzinger and Cheney (as) “participating in a Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse”
...It also calls on the party to no longer support Cheney and Kinzinger as Republicans.

Source:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/gop-censures-liz-cheney-and-adam-kinzinger-for-participation-in-jan-6-investigation

Excellent! As it should be!

Pelosi handpicking ALL participants on a fake committee she commissioned ?

The results of that egregious error, I could see that one might find "excellent, and as it should be",

...yet the use of taxpayer money to fund an illegitimate committee as allegedly
"this J6 committee" was, is not indicative of a functioning Constitutional Republic.

No, silly. The balance of your post.

& yet I'm a slow learner. So, please forgive me.

So sorry to disappoint.

Not my post, nor meme.
Certainly, and humbly only my reply.
To assert otherwise is what might be considered silly

No she was picked by Nancy Pelosi , the republicans were not allowed to appoint anyone to the committee.

Mcarthy is a RINO rat like Liz

Sory UNIparty Rinorat

Being a RINO rat, may be why Kevin let Pelosi do it w/o much of a fight,
or she had something on him, allegedly

Like TRUMP said the Whole JAN 6th committe needs arrest so does NANCY & her 2 mall cop witnesses & SAWsall..

butterycupcake

Destroyed evidence? What, that he really did do it? This doesn't make any sense.

If she did not destroy evidence she does not need a pardon

If she didn't destroy evidence he doesn't need to threaten her, does he?

Trump has promised retribution against anyone. He will likely weaponize the DoJ and try to indict anyone he considers an enemy.

You know, the very thing he accused Biden of doing.

It's anti-American and it's anti-Democratic.

He promised a DOJ investigation why are democrats afraid?

He didn't promise an investigation. He promised retribution.

Those are 2 different things.

It does not matter how guilty they are they would never be convicted by a DC federal court but their reputations and that of the democrat party will end up being exposed for all to see.

So...'it does not matter how guilty they are..."

That's an interesting phrase. It seems, to me, you don't care about factual reality but instead only care about the destruction of your political rivals using the Department of Justice.

Which sounds a lot like what MAGA kept accusing Biden of doing...

No it’s just a simple statement that a Democrat politician would never be found guilty by DC federal court no matter the evidence of guilt.

Well he already did try, in his previous term. He was informed that he couldn't by judges and advisors from his own administration.

But now instead of appointing people he knew or that were recommended to him, he's surrounding himself with straight up 100% loyalists/sycophants who won't stop him.

destroyed exculpatory evidence and in the case of Cassity Hutchinson she committed witness tampering apparently. LOL

Destroyed exculpatory evidence?!?

What evidence would that be?

That’s what investigations are for

Regardless of any evidence of a crime, investigate until you find one, huh?

They are investigating specific allegations

Liz Cheney did the right thing, which is rare for republicans these days

Liz Channey tampered with a witness which is illeagal. She will never be convicted in DC but her credibility is completely gone.

Be more specific

Cassidy Hutchinson was directly contacted by Liz Cheney regarding and coached about her testimony. They are also investigating if Lizzo and Benny destroyed witness transcripts and documents.