The whole concept of sigma, alpha, beta whatever male is the right-wing equivalent of LGBTQ+ gender ideology

Have talked to plenty of asexuals and they usually say one, some, or all of the following-
1) Not understanding why they have to be involved in this because they have zero interest in anything sexual wether the act itself or the overall discussion.
2) Being asexual doesn't mean you can also hold the straight, gay, lesbian, bi, etc card.
3) The people that make fun of them the most are a majority in the LGBTQ+ (OOPPSS!)

Yeah, I don't see the point in counting asexual as an LGBTQ+ identity, it's just not having any desire for sex. There are sometimes asexual people who are in straight relationships (a cis man and a cis woman) and I don't see any reason to count them as part of LGBTQ+ community, if anything they have more in common with abstinent conservative Christians than anyone LGBTQ+. These asexuals who are in straight relationships have only ever had one time to conceive their child have in their marriage and there are conservatives Christians that are so conservative they only have sex to procreate. I mean, if being straight and not liking sex can be counted as LGBTQ+ can these very strict, sex-hating conservative Christians be counted as LGBTQ+? No in fact the LGBTQ+ community view conservative Christians as the literal enemy and oppresser of the LGBTQ+ community. The LGBTQ+ community are united as sexualities that were frowned upon as "not normal" in society and even oppressed. Were people who don't have sex oppressed in society as the gays were? Were people who don't have sex frowned upon by conservative Christians? No, in fact I seem to recall that strict conservative Christians prefer that people don't like sex for pleasure. Saying asexual is a sexuality is like saying atheism is a religion, off is a tv channel and bald is a hairstyle.

Nobody I know runs around identifying themselves as alpha, beta, or Cis male/female. That is a leftist thing to put others they can’t control in a box.

The alpha, sigma, beta, etc. socio-sexual heirachy isn't something that the left believe in, it's a more right-wing pro-patriarchy thing pushed by the right such as Andrew Tate. The left are anti-patriarchy so they are likely to full reject such a concept pushed by people like Andrew Tate. The left only believe in LGBTQ+ made up gender theory. There is yet another thing, leftists believe the inane idea that you can your gender just because there are certain animal species such as clownfish than can change their biological sex and the socio sexual hierarchy is a theory developed by nature biologists after seeing wolves in the wild. The problem with both theories is that humans are not animals, we are not clownfish and we are also not wolves.