When you look behind the words, you see the intentions

The fact that you think that books celebrating diversity is porn is telling

It isn’t porn? I’ve read most the books that have been banned

I am a kid, I have read these books, almost all of them. It isn’t porn. At the very most, it is sex ed allowed only in, say, middle school, where sex ed is already being taught

As I’ve said, I am a kid, I have read these books, they are not porn, but just sex ed for kids at the age they already learning sex ed, or books that are actually celebrating diversity. But that isn’t what this post is about, it’s about being a hateful bigot

No it’s if you remove books just acknowledging the existence of queer people like red white and royal blue

*gay/trans person exists*
Parents: They’re indoctrinating our kids!
*cishet kiss in a kid’s movie*
Parents: This is toootally normal

Cis (prefix)
To be the same

Nope! Genderqueer people have always existed and also exist outside of homosapiens

Cisgender: somebody that identifies with the gender identity given to them at birth

1. Gender cannot change
2. All people are the gender they were born as
3. Some people may not realise the gender they were born as is the one that doesn’t match them

The first point is correct! Genderqueer people have always existed, I’m glad you agree. However, the next two points are incorrect

I am a kid and the general consensus of kids is that you should LEAVE QUEER PEOPLE ALONE, WE JUST WANT REPRESENTATION, and the fact that YOUR mind went immediately to porn is the problem

It isn’t porn. And every other person who has actually read the books would agree

For children bro. Adults can read whatever they want.

Ya think?