Imgflip Logo Icon

Truth in advertising.

Truth in advertising. | WOULDN’T IT BE GREAT IF POLITICAL ADS WERE LIKE PRESCRIPTION ADS; AND CAME WITH WARNING LABELS; CAUTION:; VOTING DEMOCRAT MAY CAUSE LOSS OF FREE SPEECH, INCREASED INFLATION, INCREASED CRIME, LESS POLICE PROTECTION. VOTERS UNDER DEMOCRATS HAVE REPORTED LOSS OF 2A RIGHTS, BEING PRIORITIZED BEHIND FOREIGNERS AND GASLIGHTING. | image tagged in memes,hide the pain harold,kamala harris with tim walz | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
651 views 54 upvotes Made by RunawayTrain 3 months ago in politics
48 Comments
5 ups, 3mo
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
5 ups, 3mo,
3 replies
What good would it do? They already lie in their ads.
7 ups, 3mo
It would counter the lies.
6 ups, 3mo
About that - would be nice if the FEC and FCC did their frickin' jobs.
6 ups, 3mo,
2 replies
Not one court had the balls to hear all the evidence of the 2020 election fraud. The MSM has not disproved the Springfield story, why? Because they can't. And why did Mayorkas state FEMA was out of money? Where did their funding go?? It most definitely didn't go to Americans... Lying was never taboo on the left... that's clearly evident.
5 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Well we know nearly $5 Billion was spent on (cough cough) COVID-19 this September..
5 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Yup... and a gov watchdog just found 7 Billion of unused funds at FEMA
5 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
LOL - Next thing you know, we'll all be forced to wear masks again.
1 up, 3mo
wouldn't you have had to wear them already to be forced to do it again?
[deleted]
2 ups, 3mo,
3 replies
Nonsense - there courts were more than happy to hear all the evidence, there just wasn't any.

It's really sad that, at this point, you've uncritically regurgitated so many lies that you're too ashamed to admit you were conned, and so have to relentlessly keep doubling down and repeating the newer, dumber lies over and over and over.

Springfield has been widely debunked, and JD even admitted to making it up, and Mayorkas was asking for additional FEMA funding because the scale and magnitude of major storms making landfall after refusing to do anything about climate change for 50 years are outstripping what we've prepared for. It has nothing whatsoever to do with illegals.
4 ups, 3mo
Not TRUE.... no court had an open hearing where all evidence of election fraud could be presented... lie some more...
3 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Uncritical? Like not wanting any discussion about Covid or its origins? Or rubber stamping an immigrant invasion policy without question? Speaking against and not wanting to investigate any concerns that divide Americans. Leftist puppets willfully deny truth whenever it doesn’t harmonize with the spin the machine puts out.
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
pssst.... BS... you're doing exactly what he said.
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Pssst I wouldn’t expect you to say anything else. The point was uncritical asesssment and the hypocrisy of a democrat calling others that.
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
your expectation was well founded. as an independent, i'm happy to offer my objective impressions and fact checking on any debate involving opposing viewpoints. hopefully you'll find it helpful after sufficient bludgeoning ( :
2 ups, 3mo,
3 replies
I am a registered independent as well. It’s unfortunate you believe your message must be bludgeoned, but it does indicate your leftist slant regardless of your party non affiliation.
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
my my my. i forgot how sensitive you can be. and when did i call Republicans cult followers?
1 up, 3mo
lol 😆 as if you know me. Whose alt are you?
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
i'm not an alt. more of a reincarnation, li'l buddy.
1 up, 3mo
🤣 yeah right, Betty
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
it only needs bludgeoning in certain cases. my 'message' favors eclectic sensibility, and in recent times, that's had to favor Democrat candidates to avoid unacceptable alternatives. i'm sure you kinda partly understand.
1 up, 3mo
Your message favors America hating leftists. Your leftist slant is apparent in every aspect. From the hypocrisy of calling Republicans cult followers with a handle of “thegreat Barack Obama” to the smarmy smugness and insinuated elitism with which you speak. I see you leopard.
2 ups, 3mo,
2 replies
at first i couldn't tell if they were too ashamed, or if they actually believed what they say, or if they bought in to the lying-as-a-political-tool so deeply that they just got to be really good at it. but now i think you're right. how gullible would that many people have to be to be conned so completely over an EIGHT YEAR PERIOD? and people that were conned almost completely wouldn't be clever enough to lie that convincingly. so yeah, it's probably shame.
1 up, 3mo
“i mean your list of "those who use lying as a political tool" seems incomplete. you can't think of any Republicans who do that? maybe some congressfolk? not even a few dozen?”

My list was a response to the specific question and since you can’t add any Republican name's to it you are asking a different question.

As to the new question, All politicians lie, including thegreatbarackobama. Have you seen one who hasn’t? Some lie more than others. Some change their stance depending on who they are talking to. This has always been the case. Virtue is a rare thing in politicians.
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Lying as a political tool? The border is secure? Inflation is transitory. Joe is perfectly cognizant? The only ones being conned are leftist and globalists.
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
who said the border is secure or that Joe is perfectly cognizant?
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Those who use lying as a political tool. (I.e. Kamala, Pelosi, Mayorkas and the entirety of leftist controlled media propagandists.
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
your list seems incomplete and a little biased, not that you yourself could ever be, of course.
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
You asked I answered. Wasn’t aware of any “republicans” making any such statements or I might have listed one. Maybe you can make it fair and list some who said that without any bias as your screen name implies your utterly unbiased😂
0 ups, 3mo
i mean your list of "those who use lying as a political tool" seems incomplete. you can't think of any Republicans who do that? maybe some congressfolk? not even a few dozen?
2 ups, 3mo
You believe Biden got 81 million legitimate votes in 2020, Hunters laptop was Russian disinformation and open borders is a good policy. Lying goes hand in hand with the left along with hypocrisy.
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Rhinos are worse than democrats
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
has anyone ever pointed out to you that actual Republicans see MAGA as the rinos?
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Nope, who cares what Rinos and their globalist scum allies think. Rinos are the controlled opposition. They are the Washington generals who always lose to the Harlem Globetrotters. Liz Cheney is the war monger poster girl for Rino crap.
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
oh, okay. i just wanted to let you know. maybe you could formally break away from the GOP and make MAGA an official new party. it would be less confusing in the history books. it might not be important to you, but kids of the future are gonna have to be able to understand this whole drama.
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Well that would be ok but then the marxists and “social democrats” have to leave the Democrat party to form the new Marxist party.
1 up, 3mo,
2 replies
i think that party already exists. some members may have been dems at one time but found that dem party principles didn't quite work for them. so what are you waiting for?
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
I am a registered independent and always have been so I wouldn’t join any of those parties, but to claim that the GOP has changed without also acknowledging the Democrat party has changed is dishonest. The party that championed free speech now seeks to limit and outlaw it. Thats not my mom’s democrat party. Nor is it the party of JFK and most other America loving democrats.
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
oh i never claimed the Dems haven't changed, so that's not dishonesty. all parties change almost inevitably. but i don't see the same degree of change or potential harm there that i see in the MAGA wing of the GOP. i don't agree with everything the Dems support, but i have to choose one or the other in November, so i choose the one i can live with more tolerably.

and your Mom's democrat party was just as against the kind of speech that today's party find irresponsible and destructive. maybe you're not old enough to remember.
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
Nope, the old democrat party fought for free speech, not for censorship. If you don’t remember that then your memory is giving way to dementia or you are too young to know.
0 ups, 3mo
they fought for free speech, which we now call responsible free speech.
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
“they fought for free speech, which we now call responsible free speech.”

“Responsible” free speech? What’s that? Of course you also believe you get to define what is responsible, right? That’s not free speech. That’s a rabbit hole to censorship and if you don’t support free speech you are not an American you just live here.
0 ups, 3mo,
2 replies
the reasons for which i'm going to stop replying to you are that you need too much attention and you assume that you're always right ( :
1 up, 3mo
“no dude, no. you're an annoying person who enjoys talking down to people. i can't be the first person who's told you this.”

You can stop responding anytime you like. If I annoy people like you I’m happy. Your hypocrisy knows no ends. You look down your nose at people then say they are talking down to you? 😂 I can only talk down to you if you are stupid and believe it. Otherwise I’m conversing and you can’t take the heat. Please leave the kitchen.
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
You are going to stop replying because you have no answer to truth and are unable to refute it.
0 ups, 3mo
no dude, no. you're an annoying person who enjoys talking down to people. i can't be the first person who's told you this.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • Hide the Pain Harold
  • Kamala Harris with Tim Walz
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    WOULDN’T IT BE GREAT IF POLITICAL ADS WERE LIKE PRESCRIPTION ADS; AND CAME WITH WARNING LABELS; CAUTION:; VOTING DEMOCRAT MAY CAUSE LOSS OF FREE SPEECH, INCREASED INFLATION, INCREASED CRIME, LESS POLICE PROTECTION. VOTERS UNDER DEMOCRATS HAVE REPORTED LOSS OF 2A RIGHTS, BEING PRIORITIZED BEHIND FOREIGNERS AND GASLIGHTING.