Imgflip Logo Icon

Women Have Come A Long Way Baby And We Are NEVER Going Back To That Unconstitutional Behavior

Women Have Come A Long Way Baby And We Are NEVER Going Back To That Unconstitutional Behavior | Women weren't given the right to vote until 1921 {as if women need a man's permission}; Since women started voting Men haven't been able to control the national elections; Trump's illegitimate Supreme Court erased EVERY VOTE EVERY WOMAN EVER CAST by going back to laws that were in effect BEFORE women were even ALLOWED to vote; They're trying to erase WOMEN! They're trying to make the United States a religious state just like Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan where women have NO RIGHTS | image tagged in democracy,maga,donald trump is a convicted rapist,lock him up,unconstitutional,memes | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
25 Comments
AmericanViking
6 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Nope... they gave back to each state their right to determine for themselves...
regularfeller
3 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
The us supreme court ruled that the abortion issue is not a federal issue and is returned to the legislative bodies of the individual states.

The federal government initially took the right to life from the unborn people and now have determined that the issue of when and how babies can be murdered belongs to the people of the individual states.

Vote there.

At the state level.

Where you live and are most affected by governmental rule.
[deleted]
1 up, 3mo
Sure they did - ruled that out of hand completely ignoring five decades of jurisprudence and rulings, stripping women of an established right.

Just because you've corrupted the high court doesn't make what they've done just.
g_user_103623491695865537650
6 ups, 3mo
Lies…same shit different day but the lies remain the same
regularfeller
3 ups, 3mo
Laughing Leo Meme | NONSENSE ! | image tagged in memes,laughing leo | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
For the record, women did need a man's permission to vote.

Articulate how the people's hero erased the votes of women.

You seem to be employing histrionics to create fear in susceptible individuals.
Soul_Roll
3 ups, 3mo
Where even to begin. .
Fauscovai
3 ups, 3mo
HarveyHolmes
4 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Just because conditions/restrictions are placed on abortions doesn’t mean you are losing your rights. It means you don’t have the right to kill your offspring as you desire.
[deleted]
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
When the 'conditions/restrictions' are "it is illegal to get one", a right has been lost.

When those conditions are becoming "we're going to track your menstrual cycles and purchases of pregnancy tests, criminalize travelling to another state to get an abortion, and offer bounties for your neighbors to report you", you've made women second-class citizens in your totalitarian state.
HarveyHolmes
4 ups, 3mo,
2 replies
Killing one offspring should not be considered a right. Losing it is a plus for babies. People used to have the “right” to shoot eagles. Those rights were taken away because it is morally unjust to kill an eagle. In fact endangering the species. I do understand some people don’t consider human life special or worthy of protection. But It doesn’t make someone a second class citizen.
regularfeller
4 ups, 3mo
You tell em! 😄👍🇺🇸
[deleted]
1 up, 3mo,
2 replies
There is no way to spin this - if women lose the right to bodily autonomy because they're pregnant, then they're worth less - socially and legally - than the fetuses they carry.
regularfeller
2 ups, 3mo
So what?
HarveyHolmes
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
The crust of the matter is this. You say; A pregnant women is worth less then the fetuses they carry. Fetus is Greek for offspring. There is a developing child which should have all the right we all possess. Losing the right to kill one’s offspring doesn’t make a woman a second class citizen. It saves her from having innocent blood on her hands.
[deleted]
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
Ah yes, you're "saving" women from a moral threat by legally forcing them to carry unwanted fetuses to term, that's a great spin.
HarveyHolmes
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
Facts are not spin. Why stop at fetuses, kill anything unwanted. Many are using abortions as a means to birth control. When there are so many products and medical procedures to prevent pregnancy.
[deleted]
1 up, 3mo,
2 replies
Because this is about the bodily autonomy of the woman, and nothing short of sterilization prevents fertilization 100%.

So why stop at forcing women to give birth? Why not legally compel them to be impregnated also to ensure they produce as many offspring as possible?

See how dumb slippery slopes are?
HarveyHolmes
0 ups, 3mo
Autonomy to kill a developing life-form deprives the offspring his/her own autonomy. If the baby has no value then what does it say for women. Or the men whom cheer them on to extinguish another human being.
Soul_Roll
0 ups, 3mo
The rock rolls down hill, not up.
Revonda
2 ups, 3mo
Sobrmn
3 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Susie was nice
(But her tits were just so so)
regularfeller
3 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
😄 why does Susie B look like Harry Truman?
Sobrmn
3 ups, 3mo
Yeah, hard to believe she launched any "Little Boys" in her career.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
Women weren't given the right to vote until 1921 {as if women need a man's permission}; Since women started voting Men haven't been able to control the national elections; Trump's illegitimate Supreme Court erased EVERY VOTE EVERY WOMAN EVER CAST by going back to laws that were in effect BEFORE women were even ALLOWED to vote; They're trying to erase WOMEN! They're trying to make the United States a religious state just like Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan where women have NO RIGHTS