Kamala's American last policy has changed to American are victims' policy

They didn't remove them for their safety, they surrendered their city to the gang.

Proof?

Go to Aurora and ask the bangers to please leave. If you survive, the police will arrest you for bothering the illegals.

Because you can do your own research, and I don't have time for stupid got ya games. Do you really think you are the only leftist to demand proof from sites you agree with? Here is a plan, make your own meme and stop wasting time here.

"They didn't remove them for their safety, they surrendered their city to the gang."

The thing that bothers me the most about those that comment is you actually posted it without it occurring to you how absurdly preposterous it is. I mean... "they surrendered their city to the gang"? That didn't, at any time, at the very least, strike you as questionable when you got it from your source?

"Because you can do your own research, and I don't have time for stupid got ya games. Do you really think you are the only leftist to demand proof from sites you agree with?"

My, my... you sure are cranky and prejudiced. Anyway, whether I agree with what a site says or not is irrelevant; if it passes fact-check, I'm obligated to accept the information as valid. I asked for proof because I want to see the source that apparently has you convinced and your reticence to reveal tends to speak volumes as to the nature of your argument's underpinnings.

Or, more concisely, there's no "got ya" game here; there's only you potentially getting yourself.

Thank you for confirming you're dodging the question and aren't running on anything but opinion.

Don't worry about the troll, they all play the same stupid games and get the same result, banishment.

Just doing a drive by, haha.
If you were actually in a "discussion" I would not interrupt.

No worries, everyone is free to beat down trolls. As they used to say, "we are all in this together." I admit I play along with the new ones before I block them, they taught me cancel culture was a thing.

What about it?

Because you're trying to set a tarp ?

Leave me out of your tent-pitchings, thank you.

Rite.

That pic ?

You mean the one which could be from pretty much anywhere, anytime over the last two decades and/or completely staged?

Yep

So you're acknowledging there's no guarantee the image isn't fake news, then?

Well if people would be able to exercise their 2nd Amendment Rights then this would never have happened.

People are able to exercise their 2A Right sooo... that's a nice canard you're pushing around -shame it doesn't fly.

To take out bad guys. Ask George Zimmerman about the "exercising of those rights." He was being curb stomped. The lawfare system then attempted to cook his cunnards.

No, people have a 2A Right to keep and bear Arms for defensive purposes not vigilantism. Speaking of which, Zimmerman was arrested, charged and tried for second degree murder and manslaughter based on sufficient grounds established by eye-witness testimony. Ultimately, he was acquitted on all counts so that "lawfare" stuff is also a nice canard... and also doesn't fly.

Oops.
People here KNOW thass sum ducksheet

Protect life & property.
You actually have an OBLIGATION to help people that are in danger of being hurt or killled & you have the right to protect your property.
You'll see how it's supposed to work here shortly, bruh.

"You actually have an OBLIGATION to help people that are in danger of being hurt or killled & you have the right to protect your property."

Mhmm... and those are defensive undertakings, are they not? Helping someone in danger of being hurt or killed is protection, is it not? I mean... unless the word "protect" has a new definition...

You didn't say it.
I DID
You were trying to defend whatever they did to Zimmerman.

Also, you've mistaken my description of the events leading to Zimmerman's trip through the legal system as a defense; it's not -the law is a machine. Granted, it's made of words, but it's a machine nonetheless. And like any machine, if one does something to come in contact with its gears, one will be dragged in and spit out the other side.

Realistically, the Zimmerman-Martin event was an unfortunate collision of Florida Men but... I guess since you invoked a "lawfare" narrative, it should be pointed out that the thing likely most responsible for Zimmerman's arrest is that, per an eye-witness' testimony corroborated by Zimmerman's own, he pursued Martin to their encounter point. You've probably already put together what that means although, for others reading this who aren't sure, it means when the altercation began, Martin was the one standing his ground, fully within his legal rights under FL's SYG law -which set off the cascade of events leading to charges and trial for Zimmerman.

Irony being that if Trevon Martin pulled out a gun to defend himself to the same end as allowed by Stand Your Ground, he'd be on death row right now.

In fact, round that time there was a woman convicted in Florida for pulling a gun on her physically abusive husband. She didn't kill him, she just fired a warning shot, but she got 25 years or something like that for it.

He was aquitted. He was employed as security by the owners of the property. Keep twisting it, you'll be right eventually.

Yes, he was acquitted -which I pointed out several comments ago. Oh... right... the self-admonishment about paying attention to detail. Looks like you finally answered my question about whether you take your own advice.

As I'm aware of how certain substance abuse issues can cause memory problems, here's a reminder:

Frank_Blunt1 up, 17h, 1 reply
Okaaaay, it's time to stay off the pipe & pay attention to detail. LEARN some self control.

XiaoJia0 ups, 17h, 1 reply
That's a good self-admonishment but will you actually pay attention to yourself?

Frank_Blunt1 up, 17h, 1 reply
I've had my sh*t together for a long time. I meant "you" as in everyone it applies to. Not you personally. Don't be so Defensive.
Even tho you are TRYING to be all snarky with your comments to some of these other posters. 🤔

And since you apparently didn't take your own advice on that score, I'm obligated, as a concerned individual, to ask: you uh... you secretly still on the pipe there, bud? Just askin'

Moving on...

"He was employed as security by the owners of the property."

Nope. Not sure where you got that but it's false. If you read it somewhere, you should probably put that source on your personal blacklist. Of course, from where I sit, I have to take into consideration there's no guarantee you read that anywhere -which swings things around to my next point...

Of paramount interest to me is that you're attempting to narratively characterize a flat, by the book description of how SYG laws in general, FL's SYG law specifically works as "twisting." I mean... there's nothing in my comment that isn't 100% factually accurate, true to the details of the case and yet, you're demonstratedly operating on some imaginary scenario you've ginned up wherein I've said something I didn't. I mean... to put it flatly, what's there is there and what you imagine is there is on you. No offense, but that really tends to speak volumes about your grasp of reality and/or your claims of "I've had my sh*t together for a long time" vis-a-vis the aforementioned pipe issue. Or maybe lay off the blunts? Just sayin'

Now he was not an employed as security by the owners of the property.
He claimed to be a member of some sort of neighborhood watch group.

The police dispatch in fact had told Zimmerman to not take any further action and to stop following Martin.

Cause Harm's Way was step 1