How they try to necromance what they want and Republicans then are afraid to do the same

It's harder when you don't have the media throwing smoke screens about everything you do.

Media: here's the new legislation idea - what a miraculous amazing piece of legislation, kudos for Biden and Harris pushing this.
Anyone that reads it: it says we will have to sacrifice our first born...
Media: intense misinformation about House Bill 3916.2a is being spread around. Make sure to let your Senators know you want it.

Also - thanks for dropping in on my meme :-)

What?

Some of the charges that Trump has faced over the last 16 months, were charges that were passed their statute of limitations. A Statute of Limitation is the length of time criminal charges are allowed to be brought up against someone. If, for example the Statute is 7 years - and it's 7 years and 6 months later - that crime can't be brought up against an individual.

Meaning, Democrats subverted the law by bringing up charges that were dead - due to the statute of limitations, so that they could "get Trump".

I don't think it was Democrats. I think it was more for publicity and marketing because it fit's in with Trump's marketing angle.

I mean... It did heal suspiciously fast

That's because the bullet took what it did and how it did it & the type of skin/tissue.

A mild laceration from what the photos all suggest, not really capable of bullets.

You don't know much about bullets lmao. What happens in any movie when someone gets barely hit with a bullet? Like it just catches their shoulder...

You get a laceration. It's exactly what happens when it doesn't hit bluntly and only barely hits the skin.

Oh, you mean a hate crime? like if Trump was killed cuz the guy saw trump saying gay ppl are ok once in a Twitter screenshot? Cuz I did think it was a possibility, but I don't think it's likely cuz they scrubbed all his digital footprint.

It's more likely that he was just manic, schizophrenic, or even secretly a liberal.

But again, if he was liberal, they wouldn't have scrubbed his digital foot print.

If the USSS was staunchly leftist then I could've seen it being a one sided orchestrated endeavor. but scince the shooting, we've seen the third party votes drop which benefits both sides.

That and the DNC is specifically marketing against third part voting with announcing the Biden drop out and getting the TikTok trend of "you think you fell out of a coconut tree?"

So I think it's more likely they're collaborating on some level.

*pointed eraser tip. I've actually hunted with both. so I know the difference.

Nobody hunts with target arrows. I wasn't even hunting. I was target practicing. A squirrel happen to be on a tree and my buddy told me to take a shot.

Then why change the narrative?

The news likes to do that from reality... Bc people are easy to brainwash

Have you ever "mildly lacerated" an animal with a gun?

I did with a bow and arrow, but not a gun. Was using a high weight bow, with target arrows. I let the arrow fly, nicked the squirrel - it freaked out and fell to the ground. When I retrieved my arrow It was over at the bottom of a near by tree, licking the laceration it received from a high powered bow and target arrow - that barely caught it.

A bullet goes much faster than an arrow. If a target arrow and higher power bow can lacerate a squirrel... A bullet sure as hell can lacerate a person's much softer ear skin.

From reality? Cuz I can isn't really a plausible motivation.

I'm sure if the motivation were LGBTQ+ you'd be on board sure.

In a movie... Yeah. Um. Have you ever shot an animal?

When you graze an animal with a bullet ... Meaning you nicked them and didn't hit them full bullet... It makes a laceration. Just like when anything hard enough and fast enough nicks you... It makes a laceration.

Why did they think it was shrapnel?

To brain wash simpler minds into not think it was as badass as it was. Because it's about making Trump look bad.

It's actually not the case because a bullet is more blunt than an arrow. Trust me. As someone who knows a bit about bullet wounds, it was not a bullet.

I heard he got hit by shrapnel and that would be more plausible. But the marketing is not portraying it as such.

Lmao no, it isn't. A target arrow is basically a rounded eraser tip.

Hahahahahahaha that's hilarious. The farking USSS admitted it was a bullet after speculating it could be shrapnel. You're trying to make yourself sound like an expert - about shit you know nothing about.

Take the L and move on bro.

😐😐😐 how am I more of a hunter than Go***amn trumpie.

Literally every single charge... Has been brought up by a Democrat person. It doesn't get anymore "Democrat" than that.

Well, yeah? I don't think Democrats were the ones to impeach Clinton. You're only allowed to be mad at ppl on the other side. It's marketing. None of them actually care.

I think the Clinton impeachment had Bi-Partisan support for the impeachment. Like not a ton, but Dems who felt Oral in the Oval was bad.

No, it was not bi-partisan.
And, no, Clinton was not impeached for what he did with Monica Lewinsky.

What? I literally was literally a Bill Clinton supporter - especially after his Sax appearance where he proved he could wail on a Sax.

Bill Clinton DEFINITELY was impeached for it. You're either extremely ill informed - or unable to Google something. Here - Daddy Google tech censorship... Proving you WRONG.

Impeached doesn't mean thrown out of office. It means that folks tried to take them out of office. After the impeachment hearings - the President would be acquitted or removed. In Bill Clinton's case... Acquitted.

I wasn't. Since seeing his speech in the 1988 DNC Convention. Much of it, anyways. I switched channels a few times.

You neglected to include the reason.
Clinton was impeached for perjury, not adultery or sexual harassment, etc.

But we both know you knew that already.

What did he lie about? Having sexual relations with that woman Ms Lewinsky. Nice try again.

It's just as fun for you as it is for me... Or we wouldn't keep coming back for more.

Can I get a two for two on proving you wrong?? You bet I can! Because it was also BIPARTISAN.

31 joined 227. Truly bipartisan.

31!

Which means... Bi-Partisan. Say it with me. Bi. Par. Tess. San. Bi-Partisan.

I don't want a president that cheats on his wife. I think it makes us look like a joke.

You were awful mad about Biden then huh? He cheated on his wife with the babysitter, then his wife randomly died in a car crash & the babysitter immediately stepped in and became new mom. You might know her as Doctor Jill Biden.

Didn't know but not surprised. Yeah. I hate Biden.

My apologies... This is just normal persecution. I forgot the paradigm changed

And which one signed more executive orders in their first 7 days than any other President?