Yet another attempt at "aha, gotcha!"
Yeah, we get it, you hate the bible.
While everything you listed is found in the pages of the book, what the book lacks is explicit descriptions of homoerotic sexual acts that appear in the books you are indirectly defending.
P.S.
You left out beastiality... it's in there.
You can use that as your justification for promoting the "furry" kink to kids in the grooming manuals inserted into school libraries.