https://aleteia.org/2018/04/12/heres-the-historical-evidence-from-non-christian-sources-that-jesus-lived-and-died/

We definitely know Jesus existed. Jesus is the most documented person ever In history. This is a fact. Feel free to Google it yourself. You may not believe the religious aspect, but he undeniably was a real person

No, youre wrong . Also note, statistically, atheist and agnostics commit more violence and crimes

Post it. Post the documentation, anything, showing that Jesus ever existed.

People in Prison are at the
Depths of spiritual bankruptcy and often turn to religion.

Often

Historian? So you don’t count Peter or Paul who most definitely were contemporaries. So your claim is no contemporary historian made mention but and people who lived in the time certainly made note and wrote about him doesn’t count because they aren’t recognized historians?

We have more proof of Jesus existing than of Socrates but no one questions his existence. What provoked the Christian religion if Jesus didn’t exist?

Gospels were written a century or more later.
There is no historical mention of Jesus existing till 90 years after he supposedly did.

Who’s talking about gospels. Peter wrote about him in correspondence that survives and he was a contemporary. There is more evidence he existed than Socrates existed yet I’ve never heard it questioned whether he did. Communist atheists always seek to invalidate religion. It’s in the playbook and no one is more intolerant than an atheist.

Hey, anything has got to be better than actually posting this secret proof that for the last 2000+ yrs has been waiting for a reveal that is not yet today.

On a scale of three nyomerance Atheist equal or exceed the most intolerant religions like Islam.

On a scale of intolerance, Atheism equals or exceeds the most intolerant religions like Islam in modern times.

Who? Everyone saying anything about Jesus. Ever.
What else would they be talking about? There isn't anything else on the subject.

Peter was illiterate.

Post this 'evidence' that Jesus existed.
I'll wait.

The statement made and the topic being discussed was that he didn’t even exist. As to gospels and the claim Peter was illiterate that is subject to debate. Most scholars who are non atheist religion haters accept that he existed.

https://answersingenesis.org/is-the-bible-true/did-peter-write-2-peter/

“said archaeologist Eric Meyers, emeritus professor in Judaic studies at Duke University.”

“I don’t know any mainstream scholar who doubts the historicity of Jesus,” said Meyers.”The details have been debated for centuries, but no one who is serious doubts that he’s a historical figure.”

https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/people-cultures-in-the-bible/jesus-historical-jesus/did-jesus-exist/M

It is telling that no one questioned Jesus’s existence including those who hated him in antiquity, until modern communists and atheists.

Your entire ideology is based on Atheistic communism.

What does that even mean?

Source:

https://www.abarim-publications.com/Interlinear-New-Testament/Acts/Acts-4-parsed.html

The Greek word "agrammatoi" literally means "unlettered," as in, "illiterate."

https://ehrmanblog.org/could-peter-have-written-1-and-2-peter-some-other-way/

Ah, yes, "Jesus haters," ye olde refrain anti-Semites used as an excuse to kill. Jews. Millions. For 2000 years. Is Oct 7th already forgotten?

😂 October 7th had nothing to do with Jesus or Christian’s. It’s hilarious how stridently you over reach.

Palestinians and their supporters are the new Nazis. Not a surprise, the democrats support Nazis in Ukraine as well.

8aerbt.jpg (click to show)

😂 yes it was Jewish space lasers right? 🤣 keep grasping.

I wouldn't grasp anything near this anti-Semite.

You still seem to be confusing existence with miracles. There is surviving correspondence in letters from Peter who knew and walked with him. Agai. There is more evidence of his existence than many ancient figures. You selectively refute his existence because you hate religion and its teachings.

Acts 4:13 says that Peter was "agrammatoi," which literally means "unlettered," as in, "illiterate."

Again the is more evidence he existed than Socrates. Strangely no one refuted his existence in Ancient times. People who were closer to his time that despised him and what he represented didn’t deny his existence, but you do.

"Strangely no one refuted his existence in Ancient times."

What would there be to refute if his existence wasn't?
They didn't refute Ganesha either.

“We been through this before, the coin, remember?”

Not surprisingly I think you’re confused. What coin?

Certainly the Jews had reason to deny his existence, yet they didn’t. Why?

Excellent, thanks for backing my point!
There is not a single Judean account of anything remotely resembling Jesus at the time.
But there was of bar Kohba in 70 AD, who for a time was venerated by them, and as an actual Messiah at that.
We been through this before, the coin, remember?

Post it.

Post what?

Christian’s existed without Christ? Interesting. You have a desperate need to refute religion. Did Mohammed exist? How about Moses? All imaginary people?

It is common for people to write about events after they happen. Your theory is that if it isnt written about as it’s happening it can’t be true. The mental gymnastics necessary for that reasoning is gold mefdal level gibberish.