You said NONE of that was true. So why do you take issue with golding those that caused harm by intentional act or negligence to be held accountable?
None of what they said negates any of what you are talking about.
I can tell you this much...hospitals were so barren of patients that for the first time anyone can ever remember nurses were laid off for nearly an entire year.
The government via the media had people so terrorized that they wouldn't go to the hospital or call an ambulance while they were suffering heart attacks and strokes out of fear of catching the virus.
Their family would finally call 911 AFTER they died and an ambulance was sent to take them to....the hospital.
With the survivor accompanying them. 🤨
It was a hoax as far as the magnitude of virulence being touted to the public was concerned.
Since this was a lab created gain of function "improvement" of SARS-CoV-1 which was much more virulent (killed 10% of infected) but much less tranmissable (~9,000 US), naturally, and Mr. Science stated early on, they expected a death rate of 10% (curious number arbitrarily placed on an "unknown" pathogen).
Mr Science should have given the lab more money because they made SARS-CoV-2 (Covid)
much more transmissible but far less virulent (~1%)
Perhaps this was by design since he and other researchers get paid a royalty for every shot administered until the end of time (get your boosters as soon as you are eligible for another and another and another and...)!
Natural immunity just won't do!
Perhaps hoax was a misnomer but one most people readily understand.
Let's say contrivance.
That is more apt.
