He told them .. he wanted to kill and was hearing voices.. they let him go.

There is not a search for an answer, there is the next opportunity to push an agenda.

wow, The white race, the only race you can be completely openly racist against without any repercussions.

The only race that gets blamed even when the person committing the act is of a different ethnicity/race.

Morally white? Wth?!?!

What does that even mean?

The left makes shit up as they go. I bet they don't even know what it means, it just points to white people being bad, so they go with it.

Yeah. He was arab but they say he is "Morally White". What the hell does that even mean?💀

this would not happen if guns were not legal

what

If a nutcase doesn't have a gun they will use something else.

2016 Nice truck attack
Terrorist attack in France on 14 July 2016
On the evening of 14 July 2016, a 19-tonne cargo truck was deliberately driven into crowds of people celebrating Bastille Day on the Promenade des Anglais in Nice, France, resulting in the deaths of 86 people and the injury of 434 others

oh ok, so would it go like this. "i want to cause lots of people to die". "i'll just use a pocket knife to do the job".

Or you know... a truck. Why don't we register those as a deadly weapon and require background checks and waiting periods? 🤔

banning guns would lower crime rates and save lives

"teach people alternative non-lethal ways of defending themselves"

a 105 lb woman can not defend her self against a 260 lb rapist.

Non lethal has been proven ineffective against people that want to kill, rape, or rob you. Women that tried non lethal alternatives were raped and murdered. Would not have happened if they were armed with a side arm.

give people stun guns then. they're non-lethal and takes down an enemy quickly.

Non lethal are ineffective, last time I am telling you this . If you are just going to talk in circles and not even try to learn anything . lets go our seperate ways for good.

Saying that something isnt effective half of the time is not the same as saying its never effective, come on now. they've been countless times where nonlethal devices stopped attackers with out police having to kill

so women and elderly should just be protected half the time? and F the other times? Man, you should try talking to some rape victims, it'll open your eyes wider than you thought possible.

how about non-lethal weapon development is updated so self defense weapons are better and more effective

That x26 is the top of the line, nonlethal is not effective. It has been proven over and over. The only thing that makes non lethal more effective is when it is made to be lethal.

It wasn't just a matter of how they compare to to today's guns, the purpose of the Second Amendment was to conscript militia at moment's notice because the US couldn't afford an army. And not only were they to serve for free, they had to supply their own arms and ammo.

You need to go read the letters of those people that wrote the 2nd amendment might be an eye opener.

wrong

Living in fear is a terrible way to live, might as well not ever leave your house. you might get hit by a car.. stop eating.. you might choke to death.. Better stop selling hammers , more people get killed with hammers than rifles. You don't get to impede other people's God Given rights because your scared of the dark.

im LoLing at the fact that you don't realize that the those "flintlocks and Muskets" were the same weapons used by the military at the time. Today we don't have military rifles available to the general public.. you need more education.

I'm leaving because you have a misinformed opinion on guns and you refuse to listen to facts about them. SO why should I get a headache trying to convince a child that is not even American about how important the human right of self defense is? have a nice life.

how an awesome time living with devices that can kill with the pull of a trigger

You should really look things up.

oh well you caught me. i was just trolling and i really don't care about how accessible guns are. i just wanted to have some fun. thanks for playing along.

The guns were military grade weapons, they were exactly what the military used in war. There is nothing in the constiution that defines what "arms" fall under the 2nd. Anyways , you can have the last word, I am not going to continue this conversation because I feel like I am talking in circles.

it was written when those were the only guns. you're leaving this argument because you know you're losing.

exactly

wrong

how, explain this to me in detail. by your logic, if there were more guns then everybody would be so safe.

Armed citizens stop crime, according to even the most left wing research , Armed citizens stop at -least- 600,000 crimes a year. If criminals thought that there was a chance that they would forfeit thier lives while committing crime , far far less would.

just give everyone tasers

"the police are the reason the world isn't complete chaos, you cannot argue with that"

I can argue that- Citizens encounter crime first. Meaning police only come AFTER crime has been committed. Being armed is the first deterrent against crime. not police.

teach people alternative non-lethal ways of defending themselves

You: Stop I know karate

Thug: BANG

teach people alternative non-lethal ways of defending themselves

Why do you hate women so much? Why do you want them to stay victims? There is a reason they call firearms "equalizers".

they make things equal because nobody benefits

Women benefit , disabled and elderly benefit. people that are targets of crime benefit. I get you are young and have no life experience but you should really stop commenting on things you have no knoweldge about.

so should you

I use facts, you use opinions.. you should stay away from any kind of debate classes in school.. you would be destroyed.

how about this, give the guns to the police only.

"how about this, give the guns to the police only."

So the only people you want to have guns are the people that can step on your rights? Do you really want the government to have that much power over you? - Guns keep governments in line, look at China and other nations where guns are illegal for the average citizen to own, even Australia during covid and review the human rights violations that they do and did.

the police are the reason the world isn't complete chaos, you cannot argue with that

In Chicago guns are practically outlawed, yet the murder rate is very high. The same in New Orleans and many other Democrat cities.

In Plano Texas where everyone has a gun the murder rate is close to zero.

then teach people about proper gun use, invest in mental health education, but also ban guns.

The leftists are opposed to teaching gun safety.

I instruct gun safety on an informal basis. Safety is the paramount issue.

You need to shut up about things you know nothing about.

Recently a criminal that had been institutionalized for violent tendencies (on both local police and FBI radar) was released and went on a shooting rampage.

Whodathunkit?

mental asylum. time to go back to the main point of all of this childish arguing, if there were no guns in the US then the US would be safer.

No magic wand to accomplish this.

Only an imbecile would think it possible to remove all of the guns from the hands of criminals.

So, best you could do is get the good guys to disarm, leaving them unable to protect themselves.

Worry about yourself and leave us alone.

BTW get in your last word, because I will no longer waste time on you.

mental asylum. time to go back to the main point of all of this childish arguing, if there were no guns in the US then the US would be safer.

DId you miss the part of my last comment that described how the attacked used a truck to kill 86 people and injure 434 others? Or are you purposefully ignoreing it because it completely destroys your argument to ban guns?

i never said that banning guns would solve all violence. all i'm saying is that banning guns would be better for the US.

You know that civilians in Mexico are not allowed to own guns? Yet the cartels wage wars with fully automatic weapons and military equipment against police. Gangs can always get weapons from black markets, what you want is idealism that is based in fantasy, All you would do is cause women to be victimized 1000 x more . Black women 10,000 times more. Crime would sky rocket and the elderly and women would be the main targets.

but is there a cartel in the US, no. so banning guns in the US would be a good decision

LoL Ever hear of the Latin Kings? How About the Gangsta Deciples? How old are you, bro? A cartel is nothing more than a gang that gained so much power from victimizing people. The only thing holding the criminals back from taking the streets are armed civilians.

but gangs aren't as prevalent in the US, this argument was about guns you know. you're changing the subject because you know i'm right and you're not so get off your high horse

Love when non American start running their mouths about how to make America better lmfao

this shows just how much america needs help. they need people from other countries to tell them how to run their own country.

Are you even in America?

Another foreigner spouting bs about a subject he/she/it/whatever, has no actual knowledge of.

no

LoL tell that to LA, Chicago, Detroit, Lousiana, Portland, Indianapolis, and just about every other major city in America, that gangs are not prevalent, LoL You could not be more wrong, you gotta be like 12 years old lmfao. You should stick to the "fun" stream. Cause you are really out of your element here.

i like the fun stream because i don't have to deal with ignorant people like you, i just believe that the US would be safer without guns. i am tired of you second amendment dummies that love your guns more than anything in this world. if guns were illegal and purged from the US completely, then the US would be a better place.