Traitor sold our our allies

Pure BULLSHIT

So true

Bullshit, plain and simple, bullshit

Because we all know that Trump can do no wrong!
(Trump Defender Syndrome kicking in...)

" 1) In February Secretary of State Blinken had bragged that not only had the Biden administration resumed massive aid to the PLA cancelled by Trump, but cumulatively had transferred $1 billion - even as Palestinian authorities bragged that they would continue to pay bounties to the families of “martyrs” (i.e., those killed while conducting terrorists attacks against Israel).

And millions of American dollars also went into Gaza, run by Hamas - despite the Biden administration’s efforts to keep mostly quiet the resumption of such inexplicable support. In this regard, note the current shameful State-Department (“U.S. Office of Palestinian Affairs”) website news release that was posted after today’s attack. It ended with this quite embarrassing, morally equivalent admonition:

“We urged all sides to refrain from violence and retaliatory attacks. Terror and violence solve nothing.”

"All sides?" "Refrain from retaliatory attacks?”

So Israel is the moral equivalent of terrorists executing civilians and brutalizing their corpses? And the IDF then is not supposed to retaliate against these killers?

This Biden State Department insanity cannot stand. So expect some apparatchik to take down this Munich-like posting as soon as possible.

2) The Biden administration had recently released some $6 billion to Iran through a prison swap deal that saw South Korea hand over embargoed Iranian money to Qatar - despite Tehran’s increased anti-Israeli rhetoric and its loud brag about the escalation. We should assume money for rockets (Hamas claims they have launched 5,000, and have received 100,000 of them via the Damascus airport) and weapons in general for Hamas were supplied by Iran, which again is likely the chief catalyst for this surprise attack.

3) Almost immediately, after his inauguration Biden mobilized to resume the bankrupt Iran deal. And in unhinged fashion, he appointed the anti-Israeli bigot, pro-Iranian journalist Robert Malley as America’s chief negotiator. Note that Malley is now under FBI investigation for security breaches, involving disclosing classified U.S. documents and also for allegedly helping pro-Iranian activists and propagandists land influential billets inside the U.S. government."

Not bullshit.

"Picture a Cold War prisoner swap in which we free Soviet agents who then stay on in the United States.

Court filings seen by VOA show Kambiz Attar Kashani was released Monday from a federal prison in Michigan after receiving a presidential commutation of his sentence, while Kaveh Lotfolah Afrasiabi and Amin Hasanzadeh received presidential pardons as they awaited trial on federal charges. The clemency letters for the three men, signed by President Joe Biden on September 14, had similar conditions attached.

The other two Iranians granted clemency by the U.S. under the deal, Mehrdad Ansari and Reza Sarhangpour Kafrani, arrived in Tehran late Monday after being flown to Qatar earlier in the day.

Why aren’t they all in Tehran? Because the same folks negotiating a new Iran Deal got us the best deal ever.

Iran gets $6 billion and we get to keep their agents."

No, that was less than a year ago - surely your remember all those classified documents he stole about a "foreign nation's military defenses and nuclear capabilities" and stored in his toilet?

Riiiiiiight.... I'm sure he had them strewn about in the bathroom. That wasn't staging to make him look bad

Not true. A lot of classified information stays classified a lot longer than 6 years. Especially SCI.

Senate GOP: Yup, all true

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf

Trump can't be trusted with classified info. The DOD will make sure he's never CiC again.

You know what's weird? He kept all those classified documents at Mar-A-Lago and we've yet to see any of that information leaked to the public by Trump. It's almost as if he can be trusted with classified info...

If he couldn't be trusted with classified info - the entire world would know what was in the documents he got a slap on the wrist for.

I know I know I know... logic and what not.

He's on audio tape talking openly about it with dinner guests, even pointing out that the info is classified.

So words used in a conversation that can't be validated against documents because people don't have access to them? Sounds like hearsay. I've got a Doomsday Laser I can use from Space. Can you verify that or not? No you can't.

He. Trump. Audio. Saying. IT.

Also - doesn't deep fake allow one to make their own verbal audio to sound just like someone else? Soooooo we can't even verify if that was Trump talking now can we?

And what exactly has that done to put any of us or our military in harms way? Seems if it was so vital and terrible to talk about, that our military and citizens would have felt an impact by now... oh wait. Nothing happened with it did it... yikes.

Correct, I never said that.

Are you sure you're replying to the right comment?

Also did he in fact have a document proving what he said to be true on hand that he showed whomever? Oh wait... nope. So anything be said could be just whatever info. Considering how much you think he lies, wouldn't it stand to reason that he might have lied about it? Nah of course not.

You're just looking for a reason to think Orange Man Bad.

Tape. Listen.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaand blocked.

CONSERVATIVE? Who thaheck ever said that I was that?

Me: Just curious… How DO you define yourself politically?

You: I don't. As someone once put it, I'm "anti-all ideology... an equal oppurtunity do****" (I don't want to get a timer for inuslting myself again, so censored).
Labels are for those who lack discernible personas of their own and also need groupthink so the boogeyman under the bed won't snatch them at night.

So, you are politically fluid?

I hate weasels.

Just curious… How DO you define yourself politically?

I don't.
As someone once put it, I'm "anti-all ideology... an equal oppurtunity do****" (I don't want to get a timer for inuslting myself again, so censored).
Labels are for those who lack discernible personas of their own and also need groupthink so the boogeyman under the bed won't snatch them at night.

I tend to chime in with those who are fewer in number or less heard at whatever place I may be at, or even play Devil's Advocate just to get the odd angle out there on the table.
On that site where that dude described as that, many wouldn't recognize me as I'm seen today simply because the balance in user attitudes was a tad different.

And CBS News debunked the lie about discussing secrets about nuclear subs with an Australian businessman...

If CBS is debunking it and they pull hard for the left... man. That smarts to their arguments.

ABC reported the leak and said they couldn't verify... only that it was leaked from Smith's office...

Like the nuclear sub secrets he leaked to the Australian businessman?

There's a word for what Trump did... it's called Rumor. Rumor in Legalese is known as "hearsay"

You realize the reports about this specially point out "It does not appear that Mr. Trump showed Mr. Pratt any of the classified documents that he had been keeping at Mar-a-Lago."

So discussing details that may or may not be true about our Nuclear Subs capabilities, that can also be theorized by Google Searching "nuclear sub blueprints" while not actually showing ANY documents... is a problem?

He discussed it with someone who had no need to know and who lacked clearance. That's just as bad.

Better indict Google too, for having easily searchable Blue Prints of Nuclear Subs. They are allowing people to speculate and theorize about stuff.

Speculating and theorizing isn't the same as knowing.

If Trump didn't show the documents... then anything he might have said is called Hearsay. It's not the same as knowing.

Not if he said what was in the documents. Then it's a security breach.

The DOJ interviewed Mr. Pratt, so I would say it WAS a problem.

Definitely not a Corrupt DOJ - they definitely didn't try to cover up damning laptops that incriminated democrat elites

Last I heard, Hunter was indicted.

After it was safe to do so bc Interfering with an election

Bullshit

Now who is speculating... you haven't seen this person face to face, so you're just speculating that they are bullshit. My guess is they are probably just flesh and blood like me. But I guess I would need to see the document proving that

Bullshit.