Sorriso

what does a mod do when auto approval ?

Image and comment flags come in.

There was a MSmg Mod who recently disapproved a ton of flagged images that were fine, unfortunately they don't have Mod anymore.

i dont usually check comment flags cause usually its hard to tell if its an actual problem or some crybaby flagging stuff.

also i got to go alllll the way to the comment flags button and click it. and thats a loottttttt of work

Yo can I have mod here. I think i’d help

literally nothing, cuz yall can't even do any sort of ban/deletion otherwise it's 'abuse'

bans need to have a reason

banning someone cause they are "underage" or "blue alt" or just annoying is abuse.

true but

but what

i delete posts where people like Wawa say they're gonna kill themselves

*disapprove

but yeah seems legit

man. you were a good mod

Ok

ok daddy

Joke redacted

MSmg Owners won't tolerate MSmg Moderators who break the rules. Here is my approach to racial slurs. Second time I'm sending you this, you should paid attention to important MSmg facts.

imgflip.com/i/7x3xkc

Andrew can I have mod

Whar you mean

What about censored slurs? (censored as in only the first and last letters are visible)

Seems clear to me. If I can read a racial slur in a comment or image, tags, title, user profile, tagline, etc. it's against the Terms of Use.

I got that guidance from Imgflip HQ. Thanks.

So it's inappropriate even if it's censored.

But apparently that doesn't go for the same as NSFW content. Porn, and nudity (even censored porn and nudity) being exposed to people of such a young age on here should not be tolerated. Being exposed to that could make them addicted to it.

EXACTLY
like n word has NO impact on anyone. porn on the other hand...

explain

I saw that conversation. I asked them for specific links back then. I don't remember getting any.

I suggested they contact a Global Moderator. Maybe you can too if you can figure out what the facts are.

idfk i wsn't the one in the convo

either way, you still need to do your job properly

*posts barely cropped porn*
*Is in favor of hated users who do inhumane things*
*bans anyone who slightly says criticism against them*
Yeah.... really great job....

I ban users that break the Terms of Use or Stream Rules. Have you read those? Thanks.

Yes, I read the, and in nowhere does it say that criticism is against the Terms of Use.

You might think it's "Harassment", but no, criticism is NOT harassment.

However, it IS against the terms of service to condone crimes, you're just proving my point further, and for that I thank you.

based

Don't you mean fr or ong? 7z6wrn.jpg (click to show)

why does it matter to you that I use common internet slang

I read them*

My Moderations are an open book for every Moderator on all streams I Moderate. Also every sitewide Moderator can see my history. imgflip.com/moderations

Not sure what you're going on about. You don't appear to have a point.

The argument we're having right now

I think that can work as an example

Perfect, because as of right now no one has broken the rules here and no actions have been taken. I win.

"Funny I don't remember getting caught. Because my moderation history is an open book. Imagine anything you like bro."

Yeah the times when you did that are just buried by the lots of basic things like approvals and stuff.

Also, I think I know why you don't remember being caught,

Only MSMG users have caught you abusing, but they're just ignored, and, like you said, imgflip may check your history every once in a while, but they're probably not gonna read ALL of your 8 hours (or smth) worth of moderations, which is a lot btw.

8 hours of moderations every day*

and we're referring to your posts, not moderations at the moment.

Try again imgflip.com/i/7za7km?nerp=1694804890#com27573237

judging by the fact you post actual porn, I highly doubt that's the case. if some of you guys weren't corrupt, then they'd KNOW that what you're posting is against the tos.
I'm going to repeat something you seem to have ignored--"while porn may be a type of nsfw, it's not the type of nsfw that is just some swears or gore. just because it is nsfw doesn't remove it from porn. by that logic, someone could post uncensored porn of someone getting f**ked, mark it nsfw, and be allowed because it's 'nsfw', but according to you, that removes the 'porn' status from it."

Your *opinion* is noted. Feel free to contact the site. Like bombhands did. I'll wait.

we can't see your moderations, because we're not site mods

Good thing all the MSmg Moderators, the other Sitewide Moderators and the owner of Imgflip can. Ask the other Sitewide Moderators and the owner of Imgflip if I'm doing something wrong and let me know.

In response to "You seem to be under the impression that you know what my actions have been in this stream, on the site and therefore, what I think. Look them actions up or find someone who can. imgflip.com/moderations"

My response:
Can't look them up, don't have mod, but I already know I won't git mud because you prob hate me (prob not, but I think you dislike me), but there are several mods who have reported your unjustified actions through the moderations, your actions are public, like you said, people have the rights to report mod abuse, because it's public, you can't make them give up that right.

"Perfect, because as of right now no one has broken the rules here and no actions have been taken. I win."

Maybe not in this argument, but this argument ain't the center of imgflip. There ar much other cases in which you've been caught abusing and even some have taken a screenshot as evidence

There are*

Funny I don't remember getting caught. Because my moderation history is an open book. Imagine anything you like bro.

Did you... read my point?

You seem to be under the impression that you know what my actions have been in this stream, on the site and therefore, what I think. Look them actions up or find someone who can. imgflip.com/moderations

Yeah, this is a silly meme site, so why take criticism so seriously?

Let me know of a specific example.

you know full well most of them are offline, and the ones that ARE are just as corrupted as you

None of the Sitewide Moderators are corrupt. afaik the owner of Imgflip checks our history occasionally. Eye in the sky so to speak. We are in all in touch at HQ you know.

We can clearly see certain posts in which you ban criticism AND support hated users who've done inhumane actions

Just search up "site mods" or "site mids", sort to "all" and you can see several of them

"We" lol. Don't believe everything you read on a meme site :)

he does, you just ignore it.

the fact you post porn says the exact opposite

Your *opinion* is noted. Feel free to contact the site. Like bombhands did.

you do realize that porn is NOT allowed in the TOS, and that what you're posting--sexualized content intended to arouse--is porn, right?
while porn may be a type of nsfw, it's not the type of nsfw that is just some swears or gore. just because it is nsfw doesn't remove it from porn. by that logic, someone could post uncensored porn of someone getting f**ked, mark it nsfw, and be allowed because it's 'nsfw', but according to you, that removes the 'porn' status from it.

Your *opinion* is noted. Feel free to contact the site. Like bombhands did.

opinion?

may i remind you, cropped porn is against the exact TOS you are enforcing. you are not above the terms of service?

i am not aroused by it, i just know that a woman wearing barely anything shoving her bare ass towards the camera is clearly trying to arouse you porn addicts.
why didn't you respond to my point?

yea i mean just move to pornhub

every time i bring up my valid argument, you try to ignore it. this tells me you know full well you're going against the tos but won't admit it

Sounds like the Spanish Inquisition lol. Feel free to contact the site.

the issue is that when i'm talking DIRECTLY to you, I shouldn't have to go and ask someone else. this isn't even something that might slightly warrant that. I'm trying to tell you how nsfw/porn works, but you won't listen.

You have an issue, not me. Every contact I have had with Imgflip HQ has confirmed that my NSFW WEEK content is not porn according to Imgflip, just NSFW.

I seem to remember telling you that, you don't seem to listen. Contact the site if you like and find out.

if that's the case, you people have incredibly f**ked standards.

bare ass is nude enough. it's exposing a private part in full. and you're literally a site mod, ofc it's going well for you. you like controlling what people post. (and no, there's a difference between simply doing your job and outright com banning for 8 hours because of criticism.)

ITS STILL PORN
ITS NAKED WOMEN

Your definition of "porn" is flawed

I didn't write the Terms of Use. I did start my journey on the path to being a Sitewide Moderator by contacting the site about Imgflip's ambiguous rules tho.

Good luck on your journey.

do you not understand the definition of porn?

All I have to go on are plain English, the Terms of Use, the "No nudity" Stream Rule and interaction with Imgflip HQ. Great success so far, as evidenced by NSFW WEEK.