Prosecute these Democrat criminals, now!

I agree. Great comment!

Investigate and take it to court.

There's nothing to investigate

He already faced two different impeachment trials and none of them were successful because they were kangaroo courts

Five Facts That Compel the Biden Impeachment Inquiry

https://jonathanturley.org/2023/09/14/five-facts-that-compel-the-biden-impeachment-inquiry/

None of these excuses are reasons for such kangaroo court

Yes... you missed the Schiff star chamber...

The old man is a traitor and needs to be brought up on charges of treason. All enemies foreign and “domestic.”

💯

What treason?

Failing to defend the countries borders

"Your facts are disputed

https://endhomelessness.org/homelessness-in-america/homelessness-statistics/state-of-homelessness/

Regardless, homelessness is growing where I live. We see it everyday and know the difference from how it was. So we have enough homeless that need housing and support no need to import more who need housing as well."

Using your source, it says that homelessness rose by a modest 0.3 percent from 2020 to 2022, a period marked by both pandemic-related economic disruptions and robust investments of federal resources into human services.

Therefore Biden did not make homelessness worse. It was from COVID-19. However, it could have been worse if there hasn't been robust investments of federal resources into human services.

Sure using the graph blue states have more homeless people but immigration is not a state issue. Its a federal issue. There is more illegal immigrants because Trump made it harder for people to legally migrate to America. Banning immigration doesn't get rid of the problem, it only makes the illegal immigration crisis worse.

You have no idea what you are talking about. You don’t live here. We all know the homelessness is a major issue on every city. Especially the Western States. We never had to clear multiple encampments before. There is more immigration because Biden is accepting phony refugee status claims and letting anyone who shows up in. Your country wouldn’t do that so until your country does pipe down.

So has homelessness suddenly increased by 300% within the last year because between 2020 and 2022, homelessness has only had a small increase by 0.3%

According to your source. We all know it has increased astronomically. Only leftist stooges say it hasn’t. Regular people know because they have homeless taking over parks, at the beach and on the streets. You can travel for miles in LA and there are rows of tents. It wasn’t always like this and anyone who says it was is a liar. It wasn’t allowed. That’s like the statistic that says there was only 12 million illegal immigrants here. When the real number is more like 30 million.

It wasn't like that is Santa Monica and whatnot during the Bush Recession?

"No.
Not everything is about this imaginary Republican vs Democratic divide, especially in NY. The only ones not protesting about the illegal immigrants here are a few politicians citing some stupid 1980s policy that (former) Mayor Bloomberg had no trouble ignoring when the same states sending us illegals now were sending their own citizens made homeless by the Bush Recession then. He had the buses turn around and go back. The practice ended. Here, anyways, as they still sent them out to California."

There's always the minority of the Democrats here and there that may protest against this, or even Republican leaning Centre-Right independents too.

"The only others supporting the arrivals. are immigrant support groups."

They may not be Democrats but they're certainly not Republican.

"I ain't up to date what's with Chicago, but again, I can assure you, it ain't just Republicans.
14% "not sure"s is hardly a majority in favor."

I've never said 14% of Chicagoans being unsure whether Sanctuary cities should end was a majority, I'm saying that 14% of Chicagoans being unsure is quite high for an unsure answer. Normally from my experience of reading polls that it's no more than 10% of those who enter a poll (like at a size between 1000-1500 people) that say that they're unsure or believe in none of the above, etc.

Again, you keep trying to define everything in terms of R vs D absolutes.

Political parties have members, they do not dictate feelings.
Not only is the majority party in NYC Democratic, but 2/3 of us are either foreign born or the children of foreigners. That does not mean everyone automatically approves a ridiculous amount of illegal immigrants coming in, straining resources and making our own poor take a back seat in assistance while Adams acts like a wimp. We have enough, we don't want them here, never did. In fact, the only immigrants immigrants like are immigrants from their own countries. We haven't had many immigrants of Venezuelan origin here. That means there's really not many eager to embrace them.
You want labels? There you go, immigrants like immigrants of their own kind. Period.

There's always factions too so one size doesn't fit all

What about W?

What he did? I thought you were critical of George W Bush

Not. everthing. and. everyone. is. Republican. or. Democratic.

Fhucks sake, we just had TWENTY YEARS of Republican mayors in NYC right before DerpBlasio: Looney Giuliani & King Bloomy. Parties weren't much of a big deal here, at least till Trump got elected.

What about George W Bush? He was such a failure. He led America to the GFC, he handled 9/11 terribly, he poorly managed the Iraq war. And when Obama got in, he got America straight out of the GFC within an economic trend's length

Nope not like that

Of course it wasn't.
And you of course know this how again?

I live in LA and anyone who says it’s always been like that is an effing liar. No it hasn’t.

Your source you sent me that homelessness rose by a modest 0.3 percent from 2020 to 2022

Next time, you need to read the source beyond the graph.

S ya aristocracy are skewed reality is what you see, hear and smell. The reality is you know nothing about the illegals immigration I. This country. Even New York and Chicago are protesting it and the “sanctuary cities” are rethinking what they promise.

What is happening in NY is that Republicans are protesting about the illegal immigrants. Of course they're gonna do it, not your average apolitical person.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/15/nyregion/migrant-protests-nyc.html

And as for Chicago, 14% of Chicagoans are not sure whether they want to end the sanctuary cities. Less than majority want it ended, but I'm sure most of those who want sanctuary cities ended are Republicans.

https://abc7chicago.com/sanctuary-cities-in-illinois-chicago-migrants-city-m3-strategies/13872569/

That's just two cities that have Republicans trying to cause trouble when the average apolitical American don't give a stuff about sanctuary cities.

Looking at some data published in 2020, the implementation of a sanctuary city between 1995 and 2014 in 32 cities caused about a 7% decline in property crime and had no effect on violent crime.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7959582/

"What is happening in NY is that Republicans are protesting about the illegal immigrants."

No.
Not everything is about this imaginary Republican vs Democratic divide, especially in NY. The only ones not protesting about the illegal immigrants here are a few politicians citing some stupid 1980s policy that (former) Mayor Bloomberg had no trouble ignoring when the same states sending us illegals now were sending their own citizens made homeless by the Bush Recession then. He had the buses turn around and go back. The practice ended. Here, anyways, as they still sent them out to California.
The only others supporting the arrivals. are immigrant support groups.
This "Sanctuary City" nonsense came about as a reponse to Trump, yammered by dolts like Cuomo and DeBlasio thinking that would curry them favor with immigrants here. It didn't, as seen with the ease they got booted out the door. Mayor Adams is trying to walk a thin line to appease all bases. Check the next election to see how well that pans out for him.

I ain't up to date what's with Chicago, but again, I can assure you, it ain't just Republicans.
14% "not sure"s is hardly a majority in favor.

Bwahahaha delusional. Both New York and Chicago are having protests by the black population who as we know are not Republicans. Joe Biden said so.

I like how your statistic ends in 2014 and is not comparable to the period since 2020 and the Biden open border disaster because at that time we still had border control.

To commit treason in America is to either “levy war” against the United States; or “adhering to [the] enemies [of the United States], giving them aid and comfort.”

Are you saying that supporting immigration is treason?

https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/article-iii/clauses/39

Supporting illegal immigration is, especially when you take an oath to preserve and defend the constitution. This is not immigration and it’s absurd to call it that.

“ “The Constitution is clear: Section IV Article 4 says the federal government “shall protect each of [the states] against Invasion,” said Rep. Arrington. “When the federal government fails to fulfill this constitutional duty, Article 1 Section 10 expressly guarantees states the sovereign power to repel an invasion and defend their citizenry from overwhelming and “imminent danger.” This resolution affirms that states don’t have to be passive victims of this Administration’s border security failures; rather, they should exercise their sovereign, constitutional right to defend themselves and their citizens.”

Illegal immigration is not an invasion to America, they just need a new home because they had to flee a country where they could struggle to live.

They don't want to replace Americans and they don't want to steal your land unlike what the British did to Australia in 1788.

Then you can accept a few million over there since they just need a better spot to live and you have tons of land.

While Australia is one of the least densely populated countries in the world, its major cities (such as Melbourne) are more densely populated than cities such as Los Angeles.

So what, you got room. These people want to live anywhere besides where they live. What are Australias “immigration policies” if you show up you get to stay? Are there limits? Oh yes there are and they are very low comparitively. The idea that you would believe to preach to me about immigration invasions while your country limits severely the amount of immigrants is laughable. We have received unchecked unverified millions in two years. That’s an invasion. Invaders are by nature an enemy so supporting their actions is treason.

"So if the limit is reached what happens? You are talking legal
Limitations per year of vetted immigrants who went through a legal process. We have have received millions per year inverted and in many cases not desirable. I’m sure you could accept more than 190,000 based on your metrics. Why have any limitation?"

Australia doesn't get as much immigrants as the US for many reasons including job security. Australia gets a limitation but is expected to get a net migration of more than 300,000 people this year.

However Abul Rizvi, the former deputy secretary of the immigration department, signalled the government could adopt a proposal from the Business Council of Australia for permanent migration to be set as a percentage of the total population rather than having a set cap of migrants to arrive.

But what happens if there is more than 190,000 that enters, they'd still allow them, just if they have a visa that would get them enough time to stay at Australia before they get a permanent residency.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jan/13/australia-on-track-for-2023-migration-boom-as-arrivals-dwarf-treasury-forecasts-ex-official-says

But why is there a limitation?

"What are Australias “immigration policies” if you show up you get to stay?"

Australia will intake 190,000 immigrants with Australia's current population being 26,473,055.

That's about 717 immigrants per 100,000 people annually.

Whereas in the US, they would intake about a million immigrants, with its 2022 population being at 333,287,557.

That's about 300 immigrants per 100,000 people annually.

This is just the legal immigrants alone.

In July 31st 2023, Australia had 1079 people in their immigration detention facilities.

Yet in the US, 2.76 million migrants illegally crossed the border.

Calculating the rate of illegal immigrants per 100,000 people, Australia has way less illegal immigrants than the US, yet the US has over 800 illegal immigrants per 100,000 people.

The US has more illegal immigrants than Australia per 100,000 people, yet Australia intakes more legal immigrants than the US. Reason? Because Australia would have been more accommodating of immigrants than the US from many different policies I don't want to have to look into today, but I would later.

https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/what-we-do/migration-program-planning-levels

https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/national-state-and-territory-population/latest-release

https://www.forbes.com/sites/andyjsemotiuk/2022/12/30/us-immigration-2022-year-in-review/?sh=42b813721da3

https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/2022-population-estimates.html

https://reliefweb.int/report/australia/immigration-detention-and-community-statistics-summary-july-2023-released-15-september-2023

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/migrant-border-crossings-fiscal-year-2022-topped-276-million-breaking-rcna53517

So if the limit is reached what happens? You are talking legal Limitations per year of vetted immigrants who went through a legal process. We have received millions per year un vetted and in many cases not desirable. I’m sure you could accept more than 190,000 based on your metrics. Why have any limitation?

"So if the limit is reached what happens? You are talking legal Limitations per year of vetted immigrants who went through a legal process. We have received millions per year un vetted and in many cases not desirable. I’m sure you could accept more than 190,000 based on your metrics. Why have any limitation?"

So we don't end up in an immigration crisis where we have no place to home them. Australia's also in a housing crisis, which they're now having this bill called the HAFF (Housing Australia Future Fund) be in place to deliver an unknown amount of affordable homes that will cost Australians too much to afford...

imgflip.com/i/7zbybh

America is full of homeless people. Why should we take more homeless people? You screech racism and everything else to anyone who says we have an immigration crisis in my country but it’s just common sense in yours. Hypocrisy is the leftist defining characteristic.

Actually, homelessness counts in the US have slightly decreased since 2007. And guess who was in charge in 2007? George W Bush!

https://usafacts.org/articles/how-many-homeless-people-are-in-the-us-what-does-the-data-miss/

Your facts are disputed

https://endhomelessness.org/homelessness-in-america/homelessness-statistics/state-of-homelessness/

Regardless, homelessness is growing where I live. We see it everyday and know the difference from how it was. So we have enough homeless that need housing and support no need to import more who need housing as well.