Do NOT comply. Do NOT get their shot. Why would we comply if they can't comply to their own rules?

I trust single ply t.p. more than CDC/NIH/FDA.

I’d rather lick my finger when it pokes through the single ply than take the jab.

Yes. The known vs. the unknown beyond what we already know about the clot shot.

The flaw in that platitude is that science doesn't require belief; the mask does what it does regardless of whether the individual wearing it believes in its physical properties.

Because "do as you would have done;" you forced an ignorant canard on me so I'm going to return the favor and force facts on you.

1. You're running that same old pathetic, garbage argument of masks being ineffective against COVID because of the size of the individual virus body.

2. The virus isn't out floating loose all by its onsies, no, it's contained in mucosal particulate -intake of which is stopped/reduced by even a single layer of fabric. Of course, if you were 1/100th as informed as you apparently believe yourself to be, you'd know that -but you've quite handily proven you're not.

And that's it -it's over. You know, this is just an extension of you not noticing the difference between a triangle and half-circle. I mean... the achilles heel of your "argument" meme is right there in plain sight -a person's gotta be pretty effin' oblivious not to see something that's right in front of their eyes...

Eh, whatever... if you'd like to keep being run through the wringer, I'll keep cranking the handle for as long as you wish. Let's play. 😆

You lost the mask argument with me a year ago; do you really want to do this again? I mean... I'll be happy to put you through the wringer again if that's what you really want...

7xl2zo.gif (click to show)
Only people asleep will comply...nine, ten, never sleep again.

Yes, they were... it was also about that time the misleadia started to push their bs about natural immunity was no longer working...

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

Seems like it was a test-run for something else too. Judge of character. Kind of like the story of Job where god and lucifer tested a man to see if he would break his faith under pressure.

I mean a person is hardly going to refuse something that prevents them from buying food and having access to society if they'd take something exclusively on the promise of getting to go on holiday one day..

Sweden had lowest excess deaths in Europe.

https://hotair.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/covid-excess-deaths-EU.jpg

https://reason.com/2023/08/29/study-swedens-laissez-faire-pandemic-policies-paid-off/

We didn't start the fire.

Why?

Why would it be permanent?

What would the "government' gain by having everyone stay home all the time forever?

Control is permanent. If you allow it to happen again, our politicians and policy makers will know that people will comply with whatever they say.

Vague conspiracy is vague.

You fine with the government forcing women to carry non-viable pregnancies. You're fine with forcing little girls to give birth after they've been raped. You're fine with books being banned.

But a mask mandate?

That's tyranny?

Women with non-viable pregnancies are never (and should never be) forced to remain pregnant.

99.99% of republicans would never want a raped child or woman to be forced to give birth.

What books do republicans want to ban?

The books he's claiming we want banned are the pornographic books in the children's section at his local library and in our schools. He continues to fail to realize that isn't even remotely true. He's going by what the mainstream media pumps into their feeble brains.

We want the books removed from our children. We said nothing about banning them outright. They are adult books that belong with the adults, not our children. But ignorant people like whistlelock will continue to push fake news if it aligns with their agenda.

Okay... for the sake of argument, let's say you've got a source to back the claims you just made --would you cite it for fact-checking?