Ol' Reliable

We do tho

Please answer Lib_and_moron_are_synonyms's question.

I know you won't.

Your solution would be the British one.

He can’t answer

Actually he did, he wants the British/ Australian solution.

I want him/you to spell it out…what controls do you want to add?

Their system won’t work here as we are not pussies that will let them take away out rights

You are absolutely correct.

arent these rights also being taken advantage of as soon as some kid turns 18 they can handle a gun that can kill and if they get a little bit violent then its game over for everyone that they may hate to their core.

Congress has a law in the works that will forbid gun safety being taught in schools.

They teach unsafe sex in schools.

You probably don't even know that human papaloma virus is an STD.

im in 9th...

So what controls would you add to the ones we already have

No. No we don’t. We need mental health control.

He is one of those that you wanted red-flagged so he couldn’t legally buy a firearm.

No matter, he would have used a knife 🔪 , sword 🗡️ ,baseball bat , hammer 🔨 , rake , shovel , motor vehicle 🚗 , tree 🌲 branch , tightly rolled up newspaper 🗞️ , a rock o, a two by four , a screwdriver 🪛 , beer bottle , cue stick, ice pick,tire iron, monkey 🙊 wrench, or his bare hands 🙌 if he couldn’t get a gun.

The UK needs mental health reform. They don't have mass shootings. Clearly, they've figured out how to do it even without mental health reforms.

They don’t have a 2nd Amendment. We do.
Clearly, you haven’t figured that out.

You are not "we," lest we forget

........ your right wing friends will not let you back into their club, blaming the us mass shooting epidemic on the Second Amendment!

I belong to no “club”. The only organization I have ever joined or belonged to was the US Army.

And the FL shooting isn’t really a “mass shooting”.
Of course, how the liberals classify a shooting as “mass” is arbitrary and done to create hysteria.
The same toll in lives and wounds can easily be accomplished with a Katana.

Did you hear where his first target was?

As evidenced by the all of one katana attack the US had in the last ten years and it killed exactly zero people.

That’s not the point, silly 😜… the point is that if someone is mentally unstable and doesn’t have access to a firearm, there are innumerable items on Earth that can be utilized to kill and maim.

Yeah. Let's do it. I want to see it. Let's force them to switch to those other items and see if they can pull out the same numbers that they're doing now. Tell me THEN that I've missed the point. I want to call that bluff.

No, let’s NOT…all of your Democrat policy and regulation experiments have been abject failures.

Reagan?

LBJ?

What about him?

Failures like attacks happening once and everyone surviving them? That's a success. That's the goal. That's the entire objective!

No

................ yes!!! When the problem stops happening, that's the goal!!!

it dosent matter how many have died if someone dies because someone used their rights to hurt people then it is already taken to far. and no way in hell would you be able to kill as many people with a katana that is arbitrary.

There is no right to harm others.

Criminalsbreak laws. You will never stop them.

Laws are intended to deter crime and punish those that abuse them.

I think they should take your privilege to drive because someone killed five while driving drunk.

16?

why you ask?

Not for the reason you are thinking.
Because of how you write.

I'm actually 14 soon to be 15 so thanks!

So, you don’t know what you’re talking about. Try again in another 15 years.

I do actually thank you very much.

i bet you aren't even in your 20s

Neither do you - such as all things Reagan - and yet you've lived through it...

Easily

Looks like Prankster got a new Emoji maker!

No, it’s old. I just thought pictures would help your mind grasp it.

Oh! I thought you were regressing to your Fisher-Price days.

pffffftttt

as if

OOF!

And who TF are you?