Crystal Ball

Using the law against his rivals is exactly what Biden's handlers are doing. Yes, Trump said it, but he never actually did it. Trump said lots of stupid sh*t.

Source?

Biden doing it secretly is morally better?

If yes, how so?

That's the thing. Is there any evidence of that?

Or is the mere existence of the indictments your evidence that Joe Biden (allegedly) secretly ordered the DOJ to lock up trump?

Joe Biden has no idea what is going on. He is just a stooge. He doesn't order anything. He just does what he's told.

Well that makes it even more vague then.

Not only is there zero proof that Joe Biden directed a single indictment... But apparently Joe Biden isn't even the one allegedly directing it..... It's some other mysterious unknown...... Obama? His wife Jill? China? Who is the alleged puppet master here and where is the proof of that?

Steele Dossier, Mar-a-Lago Raid, 4 indictments so far. If you don’t see it already, you are in denial.

The company originally researching damaging hit pieces that hired Steele, Fusion GPS, was originally being paid for by anti trump Republicans.

The Mar-a-lago raid that repubs say was unnecessary / unwarranted proved that trump had lied about not having more documents.

They had to wait 4 years to indict him for anything. Can't indict a sitting president.

I guess I'm in denial though.

This is not about winning an argument or picking a side. A handful of Democratic leaders are threatening to make us a banana republic by destroying the rule of law. The Republican party isn't any better, they just aren't in power. Get off your Party BS and pay attention!

Assuming you're being sincere, help me pay attention.

"A handful of Democratic leaders are threatening to make us a banana republic by destroying the rule of law."

1. Which specific democratic leaders?

2. Exactly how are they "destroying the rule of law"?

Your Party is more important than your country. Why do so many people feel this way?

Omg you apparently can't even answer 2 basic questions about your own statement!...😂🤣 Bro what is your deal??

I'm not playing a game of jailhouse lawyer with you. Stick those 2 questions where the sun don't shine.

We Conservatives can (and do) criticize our own party. We call people who don’t fall in line with the party ideology RINO’s. Liberals are incapable of critical thinking about their own party. In their eyes, it’s better to win for the party than win for America. At all costs. Even if it means not bending or being flexible or what some people would call “liberal”.

Ya ya ya im well aware anyone who isn't lockstep with the donald is a RINO.

And cool rant about the libs. I'd expect nothing less.

Are you paid to troll "imgflip?" If so, remember you are little more than w**re.

None of that is true. So yes, you are in denial. I’ll pray for you to receive clarity from our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. He will guide you through this period of uncertainty. Allow him to carry you.

1 Peter 2:21 “For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also SUFFERED for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps.”

Source?

The Bible.

Hm..... Not familiar with the bible passage on FBI maralago raids not disproving the fact that the donald did not give back all the documents.

...Is that new testament or old?

It's my knowledge of passive aggressive beta males that hide their activities.

As a senator, and again as vice president, Joe stole, smuggled, and retained classified documents in his possession for years.

Joe has proven himself a liar relating to his son's "overseas business dealings".

Even lies about his other son's manner and place of death - until recently that is. His handlers likely said come clean Joe, somebody is going to call you out on that load of bs.

Isn't "stealing valor" a crime? I will have to reread the statute to determine if his continuous campaign lies about his son's death told for political gain meet the criteria. Maybe solicit some input from legal scholars.

Joe extorted a foreign government that was investigating a company, which his son worked for, in that country to influence and direct their judicial system.

And I am expected to think he would not influence and direct his own judicial system to benefit himself?

That's the thing. You have an equal lack of evidence proving that he is not doing that.

Or is the mere lack of an admission your evidence that Joe Biden (allegedly) did not secretly order the DOJ to lock up Trump?

Whatever crimes you're alleging Joe Biden did, cool. I guess when he's out of office you can indict him as well. And I can say wow trump...promises made, promises kept! LOL

"That's the thing. You have an equal lack of evidence proving that he is not doing that."

By that metric I can say you have a lack of evidence proving that the piss tapes Russia has been using to blackmail trump with do not exist. The Steele Dossier might have merit. Trump might have colluded directly with Putin. And so on...

Negative.

That metric does not apply in this case.

The Russian hullabaloo has long been exposed as false by the foreign agent that supplied the phony documents and a US government agent has been charged for his role in the production and dissemination of the fraudulent misinformation meant to influence the 2016 election to Hillary Clinton an advantage over her primary opponent.

Nope. You open that door, the possibilities are essentially infinite.

Oh... "the foreign agent" exposed it as false? Which one? You have no proof there wasn't a different agent (who wasn't discovered) that would've disproven said alleged foreign agent.

Or.. there was a different piss tape.

Or... there was a second Steele Dossier.

You have no proof there wasn't.

See how that works?

I do not see how that works.

I do see how you operate.

Ok I will try again.

You made a claim. "Joe Biden is influencing his cabinet & directing the people in government, the DOJ etc to politically or otherwise benefit himself/his son." ......or something along those lines.

If you make a claim, the onus is on YOU to back up/ defend it. Saying "you have an equal lack of evidence proving that he is not doing that" is an attempt to shift the onus back onto me to prove your claim did not happen (which is ridiculous)... and as I said it opens the door for someone to claim virtually anything and not have to actually defend what they said or have proof of anything.

For example Donald Trump r*ped his own mother one time in 1970. Do I have any source, video, photographs or literally a single shred of evidence proving that?
Nope.
But you also have no proof it DIDN'T happen!

Hopefully you understand what I mean. I don't know how else to explain it to you. But perhaps for fun I will try that logic elsewhere and see how it goes.