I'm assuming you mean the John C. Williams who runs the Federal Reserve Bank of New York? I'd still really, really want to see those numbers, because the only way that estimate is possible is by redefining what is meant by unemployment.
That number your meme cited includes a great many non-working age Americans "retired persons, students", and UNEMPLOYED, in economist, means not working while wanting a job, ie, looking for work. So the number of people Not in Labor Force should not include any people who are in that situation.
This data just does not back up your argument: it undermines it. I'm not trying to punch down here: I just want you to read the statistics well and make a valid argument. This kind of meme is exactly the kind that gets posted on the left-leaning streams of Imgflip and mocked brutally, because it makes it seem like you aren't able to read the data. Don't open yourself to that.