Fleur Cowles and a “a nearing retirement Army General”? Yes, but actually no. Dismissing Fleur Cowles as a divorcee isn’t fair; she was a bigger person than that. Eisenhower undoubtedly believed her position at Look magazine would allow her to convey an important perspective on the coronation. Why would Eisenhower send an all-male delegation to a queen’s coronation anyway? Would excluding Fleur Cowles be seen as fair by 2023 standards? Puh-lease. And five-star General Omar Bradley was a personage of importance too, by any measure.
Kinda funny you didn’t mention the other two members of the delegation: its leader, George Marshall, and the influential – even at that point in 1953 – Governor of California Earl Warren, who was soon to be named Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. But back to George Marshall, Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army during the war, then both Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense under President Truman. Even in his private life of 1953, Marshall was a giant of US foreign policy. He was so highly respected at the coronation that, according to General Bradley, “as Marshall walked up the aisle to his seat, everyone stood up. Marshall looked around for the arriving dignitary, only to realize it was he.” Marshall was the only commoner at the Queen’s banquet following the coronation, and was seated in a place of honor among only 30 guests.
Thanks for playing, but I think my point stands.