No Coal,Oil or Gas for Minnesota and less jobs to.

Oh no, the horror! we must protect the federal protected wetlands for humanity.

All the while "biden administration" is making deals in Africa to mine with child labor or CHILD SLAVES to more correct.
Sooooo phuc your protection wetlands bull excuse because it ain't working here because if was about the "wetlands" he wouldn't be making deals everywhere else.

https://www.state.gov/secretary-blinken-at-an-mou-signing-with-democratic-republic-of-the-congo-vice-prime-minister-and-foreign-minister-christophe-lutundula-and-zambian-foreign-minister-stanley-kakubo/

https://www.axios.com/2022/12/12/biden-overseas-mining-funding

https://www.axios.com/2023/01/26/mining-ban-biden

https://www.eenews.net/articles/biden-admin-eyes-funding-canadian-mining/

“Convenient though the two of you don't even mention the child slaves....nothing to say on that 🤔.....No I didn't think so.”

Sorry, I decided to stay on topic of your actual meme where you were wrong and admitted so.

If it bothers you, make another meme about child labor.

You want to drill on protected lands? Give it back to the people.

Stop protecting big government then.

😎

What people are you talking about?

The public.

What the phuc are you on exactly because I was seriously joking about you being mental before but now I actually think you are mental?

The federal government has no right to any State lands.
The federal government is restricted to dc.

You might want to do some research because federal owns more than just land in DC.

https://ballotpedia.org/Federal_land_ownership_by_state#:~:text=The%20federal%20government%20owns%20around,are%20in%2012%20Western%20states.

There are far less regulations for digging, fracking, etc on land not owned by the state or federal government.

Now, trying to undo what conservative Republicans did in the early 20th century, trying to conserve natural land and resources might be an uphill battle, sure, that would be as you say… mental. But it appears contemporary conservatives nowadays care very little about conserving natural lands; and when Republicans eventually regain both the house and senate (and they will), while there will still be all kinds of legal red tape, I’m sure the federal government can at least concede the lands to the state.

You can call me crazy all you like but feel free to correct me where I am wrong.

79dlkz.gif (click to show)

Blah blah blah.

I never said they didn't claim lands where owned by the feeder government I said
"The federal government has NO RIGHT to any State lands."
And that
"The federal government is restricted to dc."
So, I'd tell you to comprehend what I just said but you've proven multiple times you just can't because of your smooth brain.

And secondly by your own words

"federal owns more than just land in DC"

Who exactly is this federal government that own the land???
and by what authority did they get the right to do so? The authority of Themselves?🙄 Sounds tyrannical to me.

And again who has more authority over lands in each State??hmm

The States or the "federal government"
because if the "federal government" can just own any land it wants in any State it wants then seems to me States are nothing but servants to d.c. which brings up the question again
WHO IS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT?

Or the federal government can just surrender the land.

Sorry that’s too hard for you to understand.