Try changing my mind:

Chane my mind

This is the only thing I have ever heard you say that makes sense.

Which one? My comment or my meme?

The meme.

Ok thanks

Chane

Dude no one is talking to you

Think about it. An 18 or 19 year old still have a lot to learn. And originally the age of adulthood used to be 21 in most places but they decided to lower that in WW2 for very strange reasons.

It used it much lower. That's why they had to pass child labor laws, because kids were being forced to work in coal mines and other dangerous jobs

You replied to the wrong comment. Still, you're stalking skills are sharp as ever.

You really are the president of my fan club. Thank you for your service.

I see your reasoning.

When are you responding to my comment?

And its wrong. I was talking about how the law treats people once they become 18. Am not saying parents should be 100% responsible for their kids but that the law and society need to acknowledge that people under 20 still have a lot to learn and are still teens by definiton (which is someone who is between 13-19).

As for the "bad situations". People under 20 living in bad situations is not excuse to have high expectations from someone who has not reached their 20s yet. Also there are people who are under 18 who live in bad situations yet i dont think you would like to lower the age of majority to 13 or 14 right? And its not all kids who live like that, some kids are living fine lives. And if a kid is being mistreated by its parents then the law needs to take their kid away from them, not make the kid a legal adult.

"Experience has no substitute", thats not what I meant. Am talking about the fact that someone who is 18 or 19 is still to young to be treated like old man, also someone who is 18 or 19 is still in college. And i brought up WW2 because thats where Americans decided to lower the age of majority, so they could drag people into war, which as a consequence caused the modern youth to not develop themselves properly. And as you stated some people who where 14 also participated in the war. If americans saw 14 year olds participating in war in those times they would of lowered the age of majority to 14 just based on mere observations rather than psychological development. And I dont think you would feel comfortable with that right?

If the age of majority was 20 (like it used to be in Japan) teens would have better time to develop. And dont even get me started on how the law criminalizes people who are either in highschool or first starting college as "grown ass folk": https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/02/28/opinion/18-year-old-offenders-belong-juvenile-not-adult-justice-system/

Conservatives like you are ruining society. There are very valid reasons to raise the age of majority to 20 and yet you and other traditonalist oppose it because "muh abusive family and change bad!!!" (As if there where not families with healthy relationships). You need to understand that 18 and 19 are transitional stages between adolescence and adulthood, so it makes sense to raise the age of majority to 20, speciality considering it used to be 21 in most of the world before WW2.

But well, the only thing many Republicans know today is "change bad!!" and "muh freedom!!". And the fact that many ofthe people they follow are anti-change Baby Boomers just makes things worse.

Dude when are you gonna respokd to my comment?

Welcome to what I said was going to happen.

Rule #1 of White Knighting: Check out what you think is in distress before proceeding.

First you complain about liberals destroying the economy yet your admiring one right now just because he agrees with your nonsense ideologies. Good grief.

Ain't about agreeing with any ideologies, it was just the warning I gave about your obsessive spamming and uncanny ability to get things so totally backwards the sky achieves the density of spent plutonium was proven to be an unfortunately correct assestment. And this isn't even a tenth of how you used to spam months ago. You used to post more replies to a comment in 10 minutes than I used to post all day.

Ok, but what does that have to do with anything about the meme or the conversation?

You really do obsess on me, don't you?

Thanks for being the president of my fan club, you're doing a great job.

imgflip.com/i/7bnb65

You replied to the wrong comment.
That reply was to whom it was a reply to. Not you.

:)

You literally came to my meme to spam bs in an attempt to sabotage the message of my meme. I wanted to engage with you in order to show you how wrong you are in order for you to stop spreading misinformation. But well what to expect from a RINO.

For. the. nth. time. he. was. white. nighting. you

Wdym?

50 comments over 2 days once, 39 was on the 2nd. And those were the ones I knew about because I had him blocked and just bumped into them on my memes on my streams by chance.

You also bumped into my memes. Hypocrasy at its finest.

Is hypocrasy one of youe several misyales?

Grammar nazis, grammar nazis everywhere.....

Wtf?

"Minor grammar mistake I win!!!!"

Is that all you got bruh? You should start using better insults, Mr RINO.

You have not even read my response. Pls man you made several misyales in youe comment which i addressed.

*mistake

I was talking about how the law treats people once they become 18. Am not saying parents should be 100% responsible for their kids but that the law and society need to acknowledge that people under 20 still have a lot to learn and are still teens by definiton (which is someone who is between 13-19).

As for the "bad situations". People under 20 living in bad situations is not excuse to have high expectations from someone who has not reached their 20s yet. Also there are people who are under 18 who live in bad situations yet i dont think you would like to lower the age of majority to 13 or 14 right? And its not all kids who live like that, some kids are living fine lives. And if a kid is being mistreated by its parents then the law needs to take their kid away from them, not make the kid a legal adult.

"Experience has no substitute", thats not what I meant. Am talking about the fact that someone who is 18 or 19 is still to young to be treated like old man, also someone who is 18 or 19 is still in college. And i brought up WW2 because thats where Americans decided to lower the age of majority, so they could drag people into war, which as a consequence caused the modern youth to not develop themselves properly. And as you stated some people who where 14 also participated in the war. If americans saw 14 year olds participating in war in those times they would of lowered the age of majority to 14 just based on mere observations rather than psychological development. And I dont think you would feel comfortable with that right?

If the age of majority was 20 (like it used to be in Japan) teens would have better time to develop. And dont even get me started on how the law criminalizes people who are either in highschool or first starting college as "grown ass folk": https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/02/28/opinion/18-year-old-offenders-belong-juvenile-not-adult-justice-system/