Again: what Musk published was Twitter giving information to law enforcement, not censorship. Any company can get their costs back for processing archive requests from law enforcement.
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
hahahahahahahahaha
You first need to HAVE evidence for your eyes and ears before Orwell becomes relevant to what you're doing.
But did they though? Musk has shown that the FBI made requests for information FROM Twitter, but that's not what you're saying in increasingly tiny print.
The NYPost has been a joke of a rag for ages. They're one step above the Nat Enquirer
I've always wondered who bought it, other than one fella I knew who referred to it once over the Village Voice. We all laughed him. Was mean, but sheesh.