Gaslight all you want libs... you can't hide the truth

:0)

I don't know what to tell you. Get a scandal you can actually prove next time.

It wouldn't matter to your side, thesis. Even when there are facts proving something, you guys go into the denial / stall game, thinking everyone will lose interest.

Serious question that *should* make you nervous... do you honestly believe that Facebook is the only tech company that the FBI told about an impending Russian hack relating to Hunter?

The answer is of course not. So the chances are extremely high that they told the same thing to Twitter. Once that comes out, would it have any impact on your belief that nothing was proven?

Or better stated, the question should be how much proof will it take for you to admit that this scandal is actually proven?

Depriving voters of additional pics of Hunter rubbing another one out changed the election.
Plus the Biden campaign flagged 5 of those pics. That's criminal. People need to see this stuff.

Nobody cares about Hunter's junk.

What happened to the democrat party? They used to be the ones against the suppression of freedom of speech, which is exactly what Twitter did at the request of the FBI and the Biden campaign when it comes to Hunter's laptop. (amazingly, there are people out there who still deny it's his laptop,

When did they start trusting the FBI? Or big corporations (as in pharma and forcing us to take the jab)

I haven't always agreed with democrats, but at least until recent times, I felt the views they held were done so out of conviction and principle. That's sure gone down the drain. They don't care what they have to say, as long as they can gain power and stomp on Trump.

and fwiw, even CBS (and I believe the WAPO) now admit the laptop is real. Even CBS! Does Lesly Stahl know that she told Trump he was wrong when in fact it was she who was wrong? Highliarious....

https://nypost.com/2022/11/21/cbs-confirms-hunter-biden-laptop-is-real-769-days-after-post-broke-story/

So why are you making a big deal about it over there?

The 5 flags? Dick pics. Yeah, dick pics. In violation of Twitter's non-consensual nudity policy. Impeach that. Hunter's non-political dick pics.

Let me know how that nothing-burger turns out.

Please pay attention to what i wrote. I said nobody cares about Hunter's junk. Hell, most people don't give a rat's rear about Hunter, period.

There are two issues here, the most important of which is that free speech was suppressed. Tell me, with a straight face (if at all possible) that if the laptop had been Trump Jr's, and we found out that big tech had conspired with the FBI to bury that story, that all those on the left would NOT have cared?

So, the left can try to make it out to seem like those who support free speech are only interested in Hunter's junk, but nobody with two brain cells to rub together would believe that for even an instant.

"So why are you making a big deal about it over there?"

Because I believe in freedom of speech as a cornerstone of America. It's sort of a big deal. Freedom of speech is not a nothing-burger to me. Sorry to hear that it is to you.

The left that I used to be a part of, cared about free speech, until they became fascists and now care only about gaining and keeping power, and of course their never-ending war on Trump. Those two things have blinded the left to what it means to be American. They're so blinded that they're ignorant to the fact that the tactics they use on the right could easily be turned on them. And that's pretty blinded... or just plain dumb.

If all Twitter cared about back then was preventing dick picks from appearing on their platform, why did they censor *everything* the NY Post printed about the laptop? There were way more stories about Hunter's business dealings and Dementia Joe's (aka the Big Guy) involvement with Hunter's "business" partners written by the Post (and censored by Twitter) than there ever was about dick picks.

As with this one, I didn't even read what you posted past the half first line.

Again, for the nth time, that's what the flagged and deleted national security risks to Biden's presidency in 2020 before he was even elected were: 5 whole dick pics. I'm sure those who voted for that dunderhead are really dismayed over his son's illustrious side hobby.

You can look this up you know.

"As with this one, I didn't even read what you posted past the half first line."

Yeah, this is what makes it difficult to have an adult conversation with a liberal.

"Again, for the nth time, that's what the flagged and deleted national security risks to Biden's presidency in 2020 before he was even elected were: 5 whole dick pics."

You're just flat out wrong about that. Have you even bothered to try and find out what's on the laptop?

AGAIN, nobody cares about Hunter. Once you can grasp that concept, you just might be able to figure out why the laptop is so important.

I'm not going to look for pics of Hunter's much hunted schlong, let alone post them. But this was a pretty image for the readership, so I'll post it instead. I like the colors.

It comes from here, with some commentary on the situ:

https://www.thebulwark.com/why-the-right-needs-hunter-biden/

I guess I really have no idea if you're a liberal or not. And since I don't like it when people falsely assume I'm a republican or even a conservative, I owe you the same consideration.

With that perspective, I have to wonder why you can read that article but you can't read a post that would take you 30 seconds? (which makes it hard to have an adult conversation on this subject, liberal or not)

AGAIN, NOBODY CARES ABOUT HUNTER.

Once you can grasp that very simple concept, you just might be able to figure out why the laptop is so important. It's about something you as much as said was a nothing-burger, aka freedom of speech, which is a big deal to me and a lot of people.

Freedom of speech used to be a big deal to most Americans, regardless of political ideology. It was above, and far more important than being a Democrat or a Republican. But that's changed with the modern Democrat party. They care more about power and control, and keeping Trump from running again, than they do about freedom of speech, which is sad, pathetic, and ultimately dangerous.

My gosh, this is still going on?

I'm ME.

Stick with your script though, and keep earning them rubles.

And here I thought you were YOU. What was I thinking?

If I need rubles, I'll come to you.

almost forgot

AGAIN, NOBODY CARES ABOUT HUNTER.

That's all in caps, but I'm really not yelling. I would yell if I thought it would help you comprehend simple facts, but there's no point.

Up-voted. But then again, considering the tendency of Dem Party voters to 'memory hole' EVERYTHING that smacks of reality; most of them won't retain any memory of their own media outlets and politicians having lied to them by the time that 2024 rolls around.

And that's not even half as bad as the Republicans who just make stuff up out of thin air to justify claiming a legitimate election was stolen

You mean stuff like claiming Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary Clinton?

Please try to stay on point, Octavia. We're talking about Democrats here, right?

Other than the left, nobody has made up anything about the laptop.. First they tried to say that it didn't exist. Then they said it existed, but it wasn't Hunter's. Then they said it existed, but it was the product of Russian interference. They've finally gotten around to admitting it's real and it's Hunter's. So what exactly is made up?

1 in 6 Biden voters, when told about the laptop after the election, said they wouldn't have voted for Dementia Joe if they'd known about it. Obviously nobody can prove the election would have turned out differently if the FBI and the Biden campaign hadn't conspired with big tech to bury the story, but it's just as legitimate to say that nobody knows that it wouldn't have. We just don't know, and we didn't before the election, which is exactly why Dementia Joe and the FBI did what they did. Assuming of course Dementia Joe had the wherewithal to even know what his campaign was doing.

Evidence that never made it into a court room is supposed to be good enough to sway an election?

Aw... you didn't know...