how the steal is done

It was already proven multiple times in multiple states. Please catch up.

Fraud deniers...

There was definitely fraud. Mostly individual rather than conspiratorial. And not enough to change the outcome.

If it was proved, why does the theory hinge on no one finding the evidence?

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/11/heres_how_they_did_it_realtime_election_fraud.html

This is the origin of the claim. It has just one problem. It says when we FIND the evidence it’s too late to change the election vote. Which is correct.

One problem. The exploit is easy enough to not only fix, but be able to prosecute the individuals responsible. And if it got back that a politician, who won due to fraud, actually had a hand in making that happen, then that would be a REAL conspiracy and also prosecutable. And if that politician is guilty… well guess what? New elections. Because YES! We do have emergency elections. Usually when a politician dies. But sometimes when that rare thing happens and a politician is actually arrested. Happens more often than you think.

I’m a-okay with there being evidence this occurred. I want that evidence to exist as you do because corrupt politicians deserve jail. But a Democrat winning in a red state is not evidence.

But you just say yes, I say no.

Around and around we go.

You saying it doesn’t make it so.

Oncee again you fail to see what's right in front of you. Multiple state legislatures reviewed the evidence that the courts would not. It was publicized in videos. You literally have to be blind not to see it.

Gumshoe thinks that the democrats are going to not only expose their own illegal activity but also prosecute themselves.. lmfao

How would you propose someone prove something about a group when the people that investigate such allegations are owned and operated by the same people being accused ?

If Republicans want Democrats to cheat and that offends you then don’t vote.

And when Democrats start winning all those red counties, don’t blame Democrats.

Blame yourself.

The first part of being a conservative is acknowledging your personal responsibility rather than just blaming government on all your problems.

You are avoiding the question, if you suspect someone of wrong doing that is in a position of power, and those that investigate wrong doing are run by those people , how can someone gain "proof" of the crimes that are suspected. One can suspect that crimes are being committed when there is enough reasonable suspicion .

If you are assuming wrongdoing just because a Democrat won then that suspicion is irrelevant.

Lack of evidence is not evidence of wrongdoing. You could rip open every computer, every file cabinet and find nothing.

Or maybe something you can claim is evidence when it’s not.

In either case, if you’re so paranoid about the government is so corrupt that it protects it’s corruption, then stop voting. Stop bothering.

Either take up arms or go to work.

Put up or shut up.

You are a master of speaking and saying nothing at all. Simply say " I can not answer that question".

Good advice!

It should apply to people making extraordinary claims like elections being stolen just because their preferred candidate didn’t win.

You are so desperate to sound intelligent, can't you admit that you do not have the answer to the question? repeat after me " I .. do .. not.. have.. an ..answer.. for that.." - One of the greatest aspects about being conservative is admitting when we do not have an answer.

Just because you didn’t like my answer doesn’t mean I didn’t give you one.

If I entertain your hypothetical that our government is corrupt to the point that it’s not fixable through elections, the answer is revolution.

And I’m not joining your revolution just because a Democrat won and you’re unhappy about it.

I’m happy to keep repeating myself so long as you keep ignoring my answer and insulting my intelligence.

You keep babbling about democrats and republicans or even the government , never once did I bring parties up in my question. I asked how someone proves suspected crimes are being committed when the people that investigate those very crimes are the people being accused. When you show me a sign of true intelligence then maybe I will take you seriously. Now try to use reading comprehension , reread the question and tell me you don't have an answer.

Oh, so you’re unaware the meme I’m replying to was specifically about Kari Lake’s scam that because she questions election integrity of Trump, lost, and then questioned her own elections integrity (while plenty of Republicans in her state maintained their seats).

Here you are making assumptions while remaining completely ignorant to the facts and I’m suppose to take your questions seriously?

First your question is pointless. It has an answer and has been answered twice. I’ll answer in all caps this time. Maybe you’ll read it, maybe you don’t.

REVOLUTION

Why revolution? I mean, you don’t revolt when a cop who is corrupt investigates themself and finds themself to be innocent. Nah, so I can see your confusion.

The larger context is that the accused perpetrators are in government, abusing power, and finding themselves innocent.

Revolution works quite well in that context,

But your question is still stupid (you are not, though probably trolling) because the people who are elected DO NOT investigate themselves. Other people with that authority do.

And when those people in charge of those investigations DO cover that up, well then you have a conspiracy. The trouble is, those making the claim of conspiracy lack a significant amount of evidence if not standing. And have an incredible amount of interest (mostly self-interest) for that conspiracy claim to be true.

And if you want to do something about it, I’m perfectly happy to go full torch and pitchforks on these individuals but if you want me (let alone a significant portion of society) to help you, then I’m going to need that evidence before I (or anyone with some reasonable sense) lay down my life to give you what you want.

The DOJ is the department that handles gathering evidence of crimes, The Democratically controlled DOJ, - at least we have come to your answer , revolt and revolution huh, well honestly I can not see how anything less then that would solve in depth of corruption and foreign puppeteers controlling our elected "leaders" . Anyone with eyes can see the covering up of crimes within our government , saying that a person needs hard proof to make that claim is what made me snipe at you, asking a citizen to show you proof of government corruption at the highest levels is as ridiculous as left wingers asking for proof of God. However , by simply observing situation and putting the pieces together - like a 50 year + politician that accomplished nothing and a nobody that could not break 1% in the primaries, getting 81 million votes, a person can logically deduce corruption and illegal activities . If you can not see that .. that one is choosing not to see it.

Another Ashli Babbitt in the making I see.

Good luck.

Your death will serve no purpose if you cannot prove your point.

And I can see that you actually have no intention of ever doing anything , because the proof that you demand to see before you act will never be able to be attained by everyday individuals . So, you are all talk with absolutely no intention of action. Don't worry you'll never have to lift a finger , you have created an excellent safe space.

All talk and no action?

Projecting much?

Or ya know, vote DeSantis in 2024 like I will. Stop being such a nihilist edgelord and grow up.