There’s no denying it this time. It is not coincidence.

Since the initial reports of election day, the verifiable number of malfunctioning equipment has gone up. The voting machines in question at the polling places print your ballot. The ballots are not pre-printed before you arrive to vote. The printers are part and parcel of the voting machinery

Some people were told to go to a different polling place. But what they were not told was that they were electronically logged into the system as voting at the other initial polling location. Any ballot they made at the new polling place would be a provisional ballot. Many of those were not counted because the person had “previously voted” at a different location, even though their ballot was rejected by the tabulating machine at the first location.

What is not in dispute is that the tabulators and printers worked without these issues during the primary election a couple months beforehand.

They were put into the slot that had no security seal on them. A seal was applied to the transport box prior to leaving the voting location. At that point the chain of custody is broken.

Okay. We can infer that this can't be true.

Because state law requires ballot boxes be secure, even the drop ones used in this case and currently used in rural counties. And if that hadn't been the case, the RNC would be dropping millions to pay lawyers to have this in front of a judge.

Even just the Lake campaign would be willing to spend whatever on lawyers if there was any shred of evidence that unsecure boxes were used.

But there aren't any lawsuits about it.

So that can't be true.

The second slot was designed for the occasional provisional ballot …it was not designed for the large number of ballots that rejected

But they still have to have been secured. Because there are no lawsuits.

We know that the 'unsecured ballots' can't be true because the Republican party & Kari Lake aren't suing to have the election thrown out.

If you read the axios article on the subject there is no mention of the ballots being held under seal until such time as a bi-partisan transportation team places them in a security sealed special trsnsport countainer. That is the only indication of sealed storage

You're basing your conclusion that there was election fraud on 1 piece of information that wasn't included in the article.

I agree that Axios is pretty reliable as a reporting source.

But it could be an omission by the reporter (they didn't know to ask about it) or it could be something that isn't' required by state law.

That the sealing tape is only applied to the box once it is prepped to leave the voting center. I've read through a summary of AZ ballot law, and it doesn't say that the box has to be sealed up with special tape in the precinct, only that it has to be for transport.

But it's a summary, so I don't know.

However. I can infer that it's legal and proper because the RNC has done nothing to dispute those votes and have them thrown out. The RNC is staffed by people who are very experienced in election law, and if there was a chance to have ballots thrown out to favor their opponent, I would expect they'd do that at every opportunity.

Since they do exactly that in Texas.

We know that people who have a vested interest in Lake winning the election and have extensive experience in elections (and election law) don't see a legal opportunity to remove those ballots from the counting.

And that the precincts followed the correct process to collect the votes.

Or it’s not required under Maricopa county refs. The state just sets the time and place

Special tape lol they don’t require a controlled random assigned seal? LOL

Their is not a question of whether to remove them from the total it’s a matter of are they even the actual ballots people cast since they came from a unsecured box and were never counted at the time they were generated.

You are not up to date.

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Ftheyre-trying-run-out-clock-kari-lake-files-1st-lawsuit-after-election

I am.

Her lawsuit is for a records request to make sure "every possible lawful vote was cast'

She's not saying that there was voter fraud. She's not saying votes were changed. She's not saying that illegal ballots were cast and counted.

She's implying voter suppression due to long lines.

Bill Gates, the Republican chairman of the county’s Board of Supervisors, said this won't delay the certification or the canvas.

Your logic is faulty.