Euphemism is the 1st step in conditioning the people towards acceptance.

LTGBQIAP

Labels matter - Lib 101

That's not a thing. You seem to bring it up alot, is there something you wanna share?

If it's not a thing then why am I seeing it being used in the news instead of pedophile, child molester or pervert? I'm not the one who created that euphemism. And if it's being used in the mainstream media then it comes from the Democrats. The mainstream media is nothing but the public relations department of the Democrat Party.

Maybe you shouldn't watch soley FOX?

What's a "soley FOX"?

A signal filtered through a tri-layered convulsion bolt.

LOL

Not true. Anyone who tries to normalize that term get chastized and fired or worse. nobody in a normal society will ever agree to that. Pedos are not popular and should be trated as such. Everyone I know has a "kill your local pedophile" sticker on their tool boxes . My neighbour makes them

They are popular with the Democrat leadership.

It was less than 10 years ago when the idea of exposing drag queens to Kindergartners would have been strongly opposed by the Democrats. Now you're fighting to get them to come into schools.

Dude, you just switched subjects like a finger snap. Get your shit together and stay on topic. Pedos bad, nobody is using the 'maps' lingo

No

Yeah, show some proof, you claim it, you prove it.

No.

Then you're a liar (which we already knew)

What did I lie about?

You claim that you've seen news stories use that phrase but you can't point to a single one

I never said I can't. I said I won't. That is a huge difference.

C'mon man. Cuz you can't. Unable to.

Why don't you do an internet search yourself. Enter something like Democrats accepting pedophilia. There's a ton of articles out there. Most of them are from conservative websites so you may have to dig through the bias until you find actual, verifiable facts.

Why hasn't the FBI released the names of the politicians who visited Epstein's pedophile island? If it was all Republicans we would have known, in full detail who they were. I believe it was mostly Democrat with some Republicans but there is nothing I can base that on except for the fact that the Democrat Party is the party of no morals.

"Why don't you do an internet search yourself. Enter something like Democrats accepting pedophilia. There's a ton of articles out there. Most of them are from conservative websites so you may have to dig through the bias until you find actual, verifiable facts"

That right there tells me all I need to know. If it's mainly (or entirely) conservative sites, that's a huge red flag

"...except for the fact that the Democrat Party is the party of no morals"

That's not a fact. That's your belief.

Perhaps some people do not want to search for certain phrases because they don't want it on their browser history. You're on a device, search for it yourself, it's three words.

Congrats on getting my meme and comment pulled btw. Thanks for not requesting a timer.

Here's one, I just used the old Incognito mode, there are hundreds of other stories and articles returned using those three simple words.

https://www.csaprimaryprevention.org/supporting-maps.html

That's not a news article. He said he saw news articles using the phrase.

"show some proof"

"No"

Pretty much sums up many of the conservatives on this site (and in general)

Do you have any links to any new stories where that term is actually being used?

Why do you ask for links to stuff you'll never read?

If you want to know do your own research. Google, Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, Bing, they're all sitting there waiting for you to begin your journey.

So in other words, no - as if it was ever such a thing outside of the realms of Alex 'Out of Commission' Jones or the Tuckster,,,

That is correct. No. Are people so lazy that they can't do a search on any of the gazillion search engines online? We (we as in mankind, not we as you and I) built these computers, smartphones, software and the internet to make it much easier to find information.

If I can find something online then so can you. I don't have any magical powers that lets me find things that no one else can find.

Yes, they are. Hence why of the they, you are being singled out to support your claim, as it IS yours and thus yours to support. Not only am I lazy as well as the they are, I can't be arsed to do your homework for you because your homework ain't mine to do.

What next, I have to do research and a dissertation paper to prove that I already know Santa and the Ishtar Bunny aren't real?

What were we talking about? Oh yeah. No. I just do not want to. I do not have to play by any rules you want to impose. Yeah, I probably should but I just do not want to. Good night.

We were not talking about anything, you were dodging it.

Why yes. Yes I am. Are we having fun yet?

Here's one I'D read: Do any of yous in this flagellating cult centered around a gaseous intestinal anomoly topped with the weirdest comb-over-and-around coif ever known in history ever say any one single thing that isn't a deliberate lie, and an embarrassingly silly one at that or naah?

How do you know that what you believe is the truth? There is so much misinformation out there that you really cannot call someone, other than the media, a liar. But then I know that is fun for you so, carry on.

Belief is irrelevant.
I stick to facts - no faith, arguments, or other distracting detours required. It makes for greater ease and efficiency.

So do I

I'm asking for links. You don't get to pretend that I won't read them

I can "pretend" what ever I want. What would it matter. I could put a link to an article that disproved everything you believe 100 times over, with facts, charts, science, etc., and either you won't read it or you would call that article a bunch of lies.

"I could put a link to an article that disproved everything you believe 100 times over, with facts, charts, science, etc., and either you won't read it or you would call that article a bunch of lies"

That's an assumption, and a false one at that. I have no problem reading things I disagree with, and I have no problem reading things that could disprove what I believe. I'm not afraid of having my beliefs challenged, and if it turns out that I'm wrong, then I will adjust my beliefs.

I've never seen anything that anyone has posted that has changed your opinions. And you have been slammed real hard with facts in the past but you still carry on fighting the liberal cause.

That would be an example of him doing like I said above, that is, posting facts.
Opinions can't be changed when they stick to facts, and thus are actually factual statements, not opinions at all.

Does it hurt when you stretch and twist the facts to establish your opinions? Just asking for a friend.

What an awesomating rubber/glue deflection!

Democrats aren't saying that

Did you know that Donald Trump said the color of the sky is blue?

I don't care what he said. The fact is that Democrats are not saying what are you claim they are

Tucker Carlson said 2+2=4

Because 2+2=4

My comment was in reference to Octavia doing nothing but contradiction to everything I said. So if Tucker Carlson said 2+2=4 that he would reply with 2+2= anything except 4.

K