NPC MAGA blue screen fixed textboxes

Well I have to assume that leftist believe pedophilia is a social construct since nature intended 11 and 12 year olds to get pregnant since homosapiens evolved that way.

Yeah... invoking events in the evolutionary past which predate such simplistic polarities as rightism and leftism tends to shoot arguments regarding social contruction in the foot... Although... it's fair to say that the right-wing mainstream relies heavily on biblical teachings rather than science and the bible has no qualms about grown-ass men knocking up children soooo.... maybe you're onto something there, just not from the expected direction.

As someone from a country were the "right-wing" tried to make "the state" to the main "religion" in the country, your right-wing boogeyman the bible will always be weird.

Fair enough... the Bible is messed the eff up. |: \

Sure thing. So you're blaming Christianity for the age of consent in far left China being 14 years old? Christianophobic, aren't we?
"The age of consent in mainland China is 14 years old."
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/age-of-consent-by-country

No, I blame the Chinese government for its national age of consent the same way I blame state governments for their ages of consent.

Christianophobic? No, I've no reason to fear anyone who actually practices what Jesus is alleged to have preached.

So you wish to stop teaching young children about sex since every state age of consent is 16 years or older and it's illegal for people under that age to engage in sex?

So just what Jesus said but not what God said? Really can't whine about the bible but only bring up the teachings of Jesus. You must not be Islamophobic then since you have no reason to anyone who actually practices what Mohammed is alleged to have preached. Nevermind what he practiced with Aisha

You do understand that sex education is not the same as physically engaging in sex, correct?

According to the Bible, Jesus is God and God is Jesus so if you're talking about what one of them said, you're talking about what both of them said. And I don't know how you managed to get it into your head that Muhammud figures into this considering that the subject is Jesus' alleged teachings.

So they teach children not to have sex and practice abstinence like they do with drugs or are they teaching kids how to hit a bong these days?

So what should Christians practice what Leviticus 20:13 says? "If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them."

Why wouldn't we talk about Jesus' brother and what Muslims believe Jesus' alleged message was?
"Obviously, Muslims and Christians have differing interpretations of the details of the life and message of Jesus."
"Jesus and Muhammad are Brothers"
https://www.cair.com/op_eds/jesus-and-muhammad-are-brothers/

I would hope -whoever "they" happen to be- that they're teaching abstinence in tandem with prophylaxis.

Should Christians practice Leviticus 20:13? That would be murder so, no. As was stated prior, the Bible is messed the eff up. Further, the Bible absolutely should not be used as a basis for determining legislation.

Also... Jesus and Muhammad weren't brothers and it's highly unlikely they shared any filial connection... additonally, Muhammad wasn't born until the 6th century soooo...

Well "they" would refer to non-binary people, wouldn't it? I can see how you're confused.

So Christians shouldn't practice what God said because it's a sin since it's murder? So you think murder should be legal or illegal? Killing unborn children is murder. Does it matter if christians do kill homosexuals since they're evolutionary flukes since they violate two of the three "laws" of evolution? Furthermore, why do you believe that countries with Islamic law should have to submit to your western way of thinking? A little Islamophobic, aren't we?

According to Muhammad, he was the nearest of all people to Jesus. According to Islam they are since Muhammad said, "The prophets are paternal brothers; their mothers are different, but their religion is one.”

"Well "they" would refer to non-binary people, wouldn't it?"

I couldn't say; I don't have access to whatever is being ginned up by your imagination.

"they're evolutionary flukes since they violate two of the three "laws" of evolution"

Yeah... there's no "three laws of evolution".

"Furthermore, why do you believe that countries with Islamic law should have to submit to your western way of thinking? A little Islamophobic, aren't we?"

You're attributing things to me that are only happening in your imagination.

"According to Muhammad, he was the nearest of all people to Jesus."

Okay... and according to me I'm the nearest of all people to Jesus --which doesn't make it true any more than Muhammad making the same claim makes it true.

You're demonstratedly operating on a delusion-heavy database & attributing things to me which are purely products of your imagination. We're done here, FB; I know better than to remain engaged with mentally-deranged people.

"Well I have to assume that leftist believe pedophilia is a social construct since nature intended 11 and 12 year olds to get pregnant"

Nature doesn't intend anything. Things just turn out a certain way. And if it is natural for them to get pregnant, that would mean it's not a social construct. But that has nothing to do with whether or not it's morally right.

Africa

Possibly. Of course, any proof of that is lost in the mists of time soooo...

Possible and most likely as africa is the cradle of humankind, but you asked.

It's interesting how you want to make it all about political alignment rather than the individual actor. I'm curious - did you look into whether the republican party has its own cadre of pedophiles or would that have gotten in the way of your narrative?

"and since it’s a liberal mindset that thinks that way, I’m most likely right"

Except it's not a liberal mindset that thinks that way. When you look at the actual numbers, there are just as many conservatives and Republicans convicted of sex crimes as liberals and Democrats.

"just as many" sounds like a "yeah, but," which, while true, and bottom line is the elite in positions of control tend to get away with these things or think they should, it sounds eh-ish.
Granted, these all are sick vile shitters, but a comparison of these lists, if you notice, indicates that GOPers tend to be a little more on the direct or 'interactive' side. Not excusing people looking at this stuff on the web, but actually raping a child IS a bit more... actual.

Don't forget the quotes from Republicans about such and other rape.

I mean, it would almost be funny if it wasn't real or so sick.
It's like a parody of the most putrid rapists suited up as Grandpa Jones in his Sunday best in one of them Confedie States that don't know any better, but we're not even in the 20th Century anymore. Can't use that "But that's how it was in my gramps day" excuse, because they're how many generations forgotten?

Obviously these should be on that bigger list, but to put a 'human' (for lack of a better word) face on these mother fu- scuse, "mother" would be the wrong word, given their preference for much younger relatives.

It's all good; he walked himself exactly to where I wanted him and clearly had to squirm with his attempted closer. Better still, by avoiding answering question, he essentially plead the 5th. :D

Good looking out, though. Appreciate it. : )

Aye, watching him dodge by pretending he can just keep tweeking what he said into something else is a trip.

I've seen too many fall for it, sadly most were newbs who just came to make simple memes. He openly bragged about doing it on P2, then complains about finally getting banned.

So you're completely unaware that the MAGA movement comprises a group which has no regard for Rep/Dem/Indy, etc? Buddy, If you're going to throw around allegations of political fealty, you should probably have a firm grasp of who's doing what before-hand.

"Since Democrats are liberals, and liberals want to be accepting of all types of sexuality, the first pedophile was most likely a Democrat."

Your words, your opening comment, and how it was explicitly made clear you wanted things to be about party, buddy. : |

"liberals want to be accepting of all types of sexuality"

Very few of them do

"the first pedophile was most likely a Democrat"

Democrats existed thousands of years ago?

Do you not understand the difference between saying somebody did something and saying they would probably do it?

"Liberal people did"

And of course you have no evidence to support your claim (as usual)

I never said I could disprove it

"Are you saying that you don’t believe that liberal minded people existed thousands of years ago and that everyone was a conservative?"

I'm saying you have no way to prove that the first pedophile was a liberal

"Saying I have “no evidence to support” my claim must mean you believe I’m wrong"

No it doesn't mean that. What it means is that I'm pointing out that you have not supported your claim with evidence.

I never said I did have evidence proving it wasn't a liberal.

I didn't accuse him of being a baby killer, I simply pointed out that if he was alive in the Old Testament he probably would have killed babies if he was told to. And probably today as well.

Incidentally, (and counter to many of the facile arguments you've posted in defense of your attempt to pin pedophilia's origin wholely, solely on democrats/liberals) simply typing "a list of republican pedophiles" into the search bar fetched this result top of page:

https://www.1776again.com/2018/03/06/republican-party-pedophile-list/

Which brings things back to my original question, the question you are apparently strategically avoiding: did you look into whether the republican party has its own cadre of pedophiles or would that have gotten in the way of your narrative?

Oh, I read what you wrote. If you have beef with Modda, you should keep it between you and Modda; I addressed the matter you brought to me with a pertinent question which you've failed to answer after having been asked twice.

So, for the third time, did you look into whether the republican party has its own cadre of pedophiles or would that have gotten in the way of your narrative?

"Since I’ve told you that I’ve seen his meme multiple times, why would I need to look it up?"

You would need to look it up because a meme is not proof; it's a meme and, as such, subject to falsification and/or inaccuracy.

"Have you ever gone onto someone else’s meme and made a comment? Yes, you have. So take your hypocrisy and shove it."

Of course I've gone to others' memes and commented. What I haven't done is take my personal beefs with one person to someone else as though they're the target of said beef. Your accusation of hypocrisy rings hollow. And, since we're on the subject of hypocrisy, let's discuss the fact that your ackowledgement of the laundry lists of pedophiles on both sides of the aisle whilst attempting to lay culpability, responsibility for said pedophilia wholely at the feet of one party is the pinnacle of hypocrisy.

"Since Democrats are liberals, and liberals want to be accepting of all types of sexuality, the first pedophile was most likely a Democrat."

Right there. Your words, your move to lay responsibility for pedophilia at the feet of one party.

I see you're having trouble keeping your story straight even with it right in front you. Unfortunately for you, your words are right in front of everyone and stand as clear-cut evidence that you tried to blame pedophilia solely on democrats. Of course, we both know you're going to try to squirm out of culpability... but you'll not be able to because the answer to the question I'm about to ask renders such an impossibility without you resorting to lying -which I fully expect you to do. So, answer me this:

If a thing doesn't exist and a person/group creates that thing, is the person/group not, therefore, responsible for creating that thing?

He's doing it deliberately. He's aware of what he said.

He looks for someone to hook, latches on to those who take the bait, and will keep at them day and night till he exhausts them out of here. He's quite literally openly stated that's what he does, even daring people to ignore him, as that's all it would take for him to stop taunting them. He's had numerous accounts that got banned for going at various folks, some of those people themselves getting banned for taking the bait. Most have been newbs unknown to most, so much of this goes by unnoticed.

Thanks for dodging the question; buddy; you essentially just plead the 5th, and my work here is done. XD