It's a good way to change history.

Just like always, the lawyers always go after the deep pockets.

So you're just trying to excuse America's participation? Like "we did it but not like the otheres" how about the abusive spouce route, " look what you made me do", or, the petulant child, "everyone else is doing it" or the cranky old man, " it was a different time".

two men enter a store.
1 steals a cake, the other steals an entire cart full of shopping. 99 times more.
all i see are people condemning the guy with the cake

If stealing is wrong then the guy who stole more is worse right? do we agree that the muslims had more black slaves, thereby worse in the context of slavery?
or are we just planning on focusing on the guy with the cake because the guy with the shopping cart has inconvenient characteristics?

Hes gonna side step this question or rationalize away the level of severity between the two thieves. His lib head won't allow him to say how every complaint made about white Americans on this subject goes triple for a whole load of Africans and middle eastern muslims

Again you're comparing who is worse at being worse. Steel one or 99, both are thieves.

Lol I was right. Magnusfred owes me money!

Someone's retarded but it's absolutely you.
You did exactly what I knew you'd do because admitting difference in severity of crime leads to a very non-liberal conclusion

Absolute intellectual dishonesty on your part to completely retarded levels

Yeah, $5 in the mail lol.
I'm not even bothering replying to him, he's too far gone.

Although nice to know that I can burn his trashcan or his house down with equal punishment because magnitude of crime isn't a thing.. it's all just crime apparently

You have found a short cut to thinking, bravo.

No argument, not even a witty retort, just the remnants of your stupid attempt to avoid a simple fact you'd acknowledge under literally any other circumstance.

Hilarious 😁

"do we agree that the muslims had more black slaves, thereby worse in the context of slavery?"

No.

"But Jimmy stole more than I did, so that means I didn't do nuthin wrong!"

I love how you corrected this so that you can explicitly admit now that you're inflating the numbers at the top of the list by combining entire continents together.

Ok lets try it this way for my orbiting liberals:
Total slaves for the new world : 10,000,000
Americas purchase : 300,000
= 3%. total not including 1000 years of islamic caliphate purchases before America was founded and 3000+ years of african empires purchasing on their own continent

There ya go. a fraction of 3% for the whole world to see.
buy a cake, eat some of the icing off 3% of it and there ya go. white man bad

it'd be more like several cakes (1 cake for each group of people enslaved) and then eating a mouth full of one slice that was 1% of one cake. No matter how you slice it (lol) it never changes the reality that if slavery is terrible then people buying the most or creating them are the ones most guilty. Liberal don't like that because it doesn't for the narrative.

White man bad by any means necessary, unfortunately.
I always found this whole mindset inadvertantly racist because it gives the apparent 'lesser' cultures a free pass on actions that they chastise the apparent 'superior' cultures for doing as well. Not even just slavery.

Like the white man should have known better and thats why he's being singled out..

'apparent'
Curious language in a misfired attempt at lobbing that chunk of projection into the 'the those people's' lap,,,

NEWS FLASH: Regardless who's guilty of doing it, slavery bad, mkay?

Its only bad if I get caught. Wait, are we talking about delicate files removed from the white house or who did slavery worse, I'm so confused, who exactly are we excusing this week?

Any talk about le Drumpf à l'orange always ends up with how slavery by racist Americans wasn't THAT bad compared to everyone else who did it worser and anyways it was all done by the Democrat Party during their DNC election primary conventions every 4 years or some crap, serving drinks and administering foot massages to the attendees and stuff like that...

And time, spanning thousands of years for those wo conglomerates and comparing that to a few centuries in the Americas divided by colonizer, ignoring the practice in and the utilizing of those in countries over which Europeans controlled or otherwise exploited.
Add that to European history going back to Greece and Rome, and the numbers add up quite differently.

Of course, OP will claim it refers to African slavery in the USA, but the comparison to others makes that just another detail cherry picked to fit a deliberately awkward pretzelated narrative.

Context in the meme is who purchased the most African slaves. You lack context.

Irrelevant