The left is obsessed with Jan 6th but completely ignore the billions of dollars of damage they cause.

Even though I'm a Leftist, It was in extremely taste for those people to assault their enemies. Committing political violence does nothing except making your side look bad and this is for the whole spectrum.

I agree.

*extremely poor taste. Woops.

Agreed

Disagree. This is also nothing compared to the abortion doctors and clinics right-wingers have shot up.

Can't have law enforcement going after lefty goon squads...

That's for sure. In blue states all crime is legal as long as you vote Democrat. If your a conservative you can't even think about conservative ideas without life in prison without parole. Okay maybe I am exaggerating but only slightly.

"In blue states all crime is legal as long as you vote Democrat"

It's actually not

"If your a conservative you can't even think about conservative ideas without life in prison without parole"

Not even remotely true. Enough with the persecution bullshit

Our favorite literalist is back. Gonna ban everyone it disagrees with! 🤣

I doubt they do that.

Oh yeah. I can testify OM has gitten many of my posts he did not agree with deleted. So yeah, they do DO that.

Only the ones that violate the TOS

Be honests. You lost your argument on a subject you did not agree with me so you flagged. Why else would you silence me. So that other people do not see how baddly you lost. Did I insulted you again OM?

"I know a year or two from now you will realize of your own stupidity and you will delete your own posts"

I don't delete my posts for that reason

"Oh, this? This isn't MY gun, officer, I was just going to delever it to you before someone came and snatched it!"

Saw an episode of Cops where someone was caught with drugs, and they tried to claim that they had bought them so they could turn them in to the police. Yeah, sure.

"I don't insult no one, you *bleep*ing *bleep* of a *bleep*!!!!!"

Exactly lol

uh huh.

"Be honests. You lost your argument on a subject you did not agree with me so you flagged"

I've never done that. Again, I only flag comments if they violate the TOS. I wouldn't flag a comment just because it disagrees with me

Is that the same perception of many here? I would like to ask them. I am sure I am not the only one.

Ask away. Perception isn't the same as reality

I don't flag comments that disagree with me. I only flag them if they actually violate the TOS

Ok, ok. No need to get flustered. I didn't know and I was just asking. Thank you for informing me.

Maybe not screenshots, but he has a long history of insulting me and others

Yes, he once called me a river log

Now ask him why those posts were flagged in the first place (hint: they violated the site rules)

Which ones did he violate?

Insulting other users

I do not agree with you = insult. You do not see me flagging your posts, because I know a year or two from now you will realize of your own stupidity and you will delete your own posts. So I do not have to.

Fauscovai doesn’t think he his. Do you have examples?

It's just what they do.

If you turn the abortion back on I think they will stop doing this

Really??? What you are saying is the violence will continue until we capitulate to your demands. No thank you.

It should have never been turned on because it was an unconstitutional ruling. It was wrong from the beginning. The court is not allowed to make law. That is the job of Congress. And a law like this belongs to the individual states, not the Federal government to decide.

If you don't like the constitution then you don't understand the constitution. If you like slavery then I can understand why you don't like or understand the constitution.

Nobody gives a f**k about your constitution

Let people have abortions

First. If that is how you feel about the Constitution then get out of my country. Go move to some authoritarian dictatorship where all your wildest dreams will come true. I hear North Korea is pretty this time of year.

And at what age do think it is appropriate to stop butchering babies? Just asking because some on your side of the debate think it is okay to "abort" a child 5 years old. You guys have been pushing the age ever since Roe v Wade started. Roe said abortions up to the end of the 1st trimester. The ink on the justices signatures hadn't dried before you guys started pushing it to the 2nd trimester and then the 3rd and then partial birth abortion. Then it became acceptable to let babies that survived an abortion sit in a room and starve to death for however long that took.

So how far does your butchery go?

Let's go back to how insanely ridiculous your original argument is

"if you like slavery then I can understand why you don't like or understand the constitution."

You think I like slavery because I dislike a document that was authored by 19th century slaveowners? The Constitution of the United States does a lot more than simply limit the scope of powers of the federal government, it lays the foundation for the intrusive bourgeois government and capitalist mode of production to manifest.

You either debated someone who was being insincere with you or you are simply making up the 5 year old thing. That isn't remotely a mainstream argument by any measure. That's not even an abortion -- which by definition is the expulsion of a fetus from the uterus. Do you think children are in the womb for up to five years?

I think that abortions should be allowed so long as the embryo or fetus is inside of the womb. I justify this by saying that a person has a right to exert their authority over their own autonomy by refusing to carry a fetus to term. However, once a baby is born it is independent of the host and nobody has any right to terminate it. It is vital that so-called "late-term abortions" be allowed because they are necessary in a range of cases. Otherwise, second or third trimester abortions are the unfortunate product of pro-birther laws impinging on the ability to access an abortion more timely.