Exactly. Excellent meme. And we all know the constitution says “The moment a weapon fires faster than a musket, it is no longer protected under the 2nd Amendment.“
If (as the libs argue) the 2nd amendment only covers muskets then shouldn't the 1st amendment cover free speech as long as it's only verbal in the town square or printed on the Gutenberg printing press?
I mean now I can have potentially millions of people reading this in the next hour. People back then were lucky to have a thousand readers in a month.
When pneumatic nailers are outlawed only carpenters will have pneumatic nailers
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Ok. And you shouldn't have one. You, personally, Tom, should not be allowed to handle so much as a hammer; your lack of respect for ANYTHING dangerous is terrible.
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
42 years experience and still at it.
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y
That worries me. You shouldn't be allowed to have one. Nobody else, just you, personally.
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
According to the fascist leftists yes
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
With its extended magazine my Milwaukee holds 55 rounds.
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Nice but Biden says 10 is plenty 2x4 doesn't wear kevlar
"BUT THEY DID NOT HAVE ASSAULT WEAPONS WHEN THEY WROTE THE CONSTITUTION"; THIS IS A BROWN BESS MUSKET STANDARD INFANTRY WEAPON FROM THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR; WITH LUCK YOU COULD HIT THE SIDE OF A BARN AT 75 YARDS; THIS IS A FERGUSON BREECH LOADING RIFLE; A FERGUSON RIFLE COULD FIRE THREE TIMES FASTER, COULD BE LOADED WITHOUT EXPOSING THE RIFLEMAN AND COULD HIT THE CHEEKY OFFICER GIVING ORDERS 300 YARDS AWAY
