BogusSCOTUS

I hope you use better reasoning than that should you ever raise a baby you don't abort.

Rulings you don’t agree with are okay to break without consequences?

Conservative commentator Bryan Fischer has said as much

Oh, and you don’t think libs aren’t saying the exact same thing…both side are full of shit, it’s just which shit sandwich you have on your plate.

Which liberals are saying it?

Keith olberman has, any you can bet you ass that he’s not a conservative

How do you propose that they do this?

The more disgusting you act the less attractive you become, soon you won't have to worry about abortions and you'll be begging the government to do something about it.

They pushed to partial birth abortions, they get what they deserve.

Ho's mad.

If you want to blame someone then blame the dems. They had fifty years or so to codify Roe v Wade into federal law. All the dems do is dangle carrots in front of people like you - environment, school loans, healthcare, abortion. You keep following the carrot and the dems never let you have it. All SCOTUS did was cut the string with abortion tied to it and they didn't take away.

Even if they tried, Republicans most likely would've blocked it

First two years of Obama they could have, and other things as well.
But they were too busy for a year and a half on health coverage and paying Bush's bills then proceeded to take the rest for granted, because clearly they would have kept a majority due to their sheer awesomeness forever.

They did, but the Supreme Court is responsible for the Supreme Court and thus its own decisions, present AND 50 years past and so forth.
The latest additions to Supreme Court justices LIED about not overturning "the law of the land." That's on them regardless of the do-nothing Democrats, who, as we all know, have been Republican lite for decades anyways.

Agreed, and the actual "Poverty Maps " are published for all to see and deny as they wish- https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations.html- note: The so-called Red States by and large seem to be actually welcoming Government intrusion into their personal lives (?)

You know, you CAN tap the reply option to those you're actually replying to.
They're not going to see you replying to me instead and I'm not going to relay the message to them.

btw, The 'Red States' have been on the gov't teat since losing the Civil War - before, actually, as gov't allocations is what the actual rift and consequent war were really about in the first place.

Agreed! My apologies for my mistake- The format here is one that I have to learn more about...Stay safe and be well :)

If anyone cares to, they might want to take a gummy and slam down the 9th Amendment- Young Americans are gonna need to know it inside and out. See ya.

?

As for "Young Americans," they're gonna do what they always do, be too busy with the Xbox or Tik Tok to step out the door into the blazing sun and harsh air and actually vote. Just ask President Burnedie [see what I did there?]

It's a type of "disconnect " that hasn't quite made itself visible to the younger Americans just yet. They are used to expecting and experiencing a lot of the good stuff as simply being ready and always within reach- the perks of being an American. Well, NO- that's not how it works.

Not getting what you're getting at nor why you're replying to me when you have some challenges awaiting your reply for days now.

Rulings by SCOTUS will precipitate a dangerous rise in disease and increased health, safety, and well-being issues, affecting millions of Americans who have absolutely NO experience with living conditions such as these. A lot has happened to make life as we know it possible during those 50 years. Are any of us really prepared to go backward 150 years in a matter of weeks?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/responsibility

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/consequence

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/don't be a w**re

150 years? You do realize that you’re being preposterous, don’t you? Where do you get this preposterous notion that because the SCOTUS decision to let the 330,000,000+ citizens in the several individual states decide the issue instead of 9 unelected people, that we, as nation, are going to experience a “ dangerous rise in disease and increased health, safety, and well-being issues, affecting millions of Americans”?

Who, exactly is there to put the brakes on SCOTUS, anyway? Overruling an important AMERICAN
adaptation to an AMERICAN "norm" by using the words of a more than 150 y/o English Jurist is what I'm getting on about. That is what Alito based his dissent on...

Says the one having unprotected sex! Lol. Oh the irony!

Who says they are?

Be better

So in some cases, insurrection is allowed... got it...

Or you could just use contraceptives. Seems logical

It's not just about abortion, it's about every single modern-day-adaptation we've made to the constitution and ALL OF THE "Rights " that we ALL have accepted as "Norms " for our American everyday lives. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/it-s-not-just-about-abortion/ar-AAYSYlA

Sounds like a democrat crying when slavery was abolished centuries ago.

Democrats today don't support slavery, unless you think all the black people in the US who vote Democrat support enslaving black people. This tired joke about Democrats being upset that slavery was abolished falls apart when you look at how most black people in the US vote

*cough cough Dems 1860s for the nth time cough*

The party didn't support it then per se, they saw it as a states' issue to be decided individually (sound familiar?).

While INDIVIDUAL Democrats might have supported it, that's different from a party platform, and the party itself divided into factions more than once during the 1860s over the issue.

Same as some Replicans and support, including their king and patron saint, Lincoln, who had supported the instition of slavery, only wanting to limit its spread for the sake of votes.

I am not into politics at all except for voting. I was just wondering why folks who are probably much younger than these SCOTUS judges- just don't seem to understand that they are about to be legally hamstrung 100 ways to Sunday without any referential resources to fight back. We older people smartly REFUSED to accept any ruling that was decidedly designed to move our lives backward and younger folks today are indeed the beneficiaries of that fight. The gaming generation is being "gamed' by the very folks who invented the "game ". Good luck with that...