Some things never change, like how evil people dehumanize human beings to get what they want.

No, Southern White racist slave owners in the breakaway Confederate Conservative South that wanted to - wait for it - conserve the southern institution of slavery did.

Not that the Leftist great liberator Liberal Republican, Lincoln, was THAT different, as seen in the meme.

You could have just said, "Two wrongs DO make a right". I would think you would want to reserve as much of your time as possible to search the Internet for b00bies . . .

"the left started a civil war over the right to hold people as property"

No they didn't. Democrats in the 1860s weren't liberals

That statement is also false, as there were absolutely no Democrats in the Confederacy.

I know that it's only Wikipedia, but damn, how can you have such thick blinders on?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Davis

Whoopsie daisie, you done inspired me to take me blinders off! Lookie what I saw wit'out em,,,

Would you care to borrow my blinders removal equipment, or we good?

For anyone else interested in chucking their no's colored goggles in the can, wiki this confounding chunk of a riddle: "why does Modda say there were absolutely no, NO, N-O Democrats in the Confederacy?"

Enjoy,,,

There's a reason why Democrats are tearing down statues of Confederate officers, and rewriting history books. These nincompoops already believe in the "parties switched" idiocy. They will swallow any lie that makes them feel good about the evil they embrace.

Yeah, so by this guy's logic Jefferson Davis et al were Democrats up until the very moment that they seceded from the union, then they WEREN'T Democrats during the Civil War. Yeah, right.

OK, so we are agreed that liberals today are sick and twisted . . .

"OK, so we are agreed that liberals today are sick and twisted"

I never said that. So much for not bearing false witness, you liar

"I never said that. So much for not bearing false witness, you liar"

hyperbole noun

hy·​per·​bo·​le | \ hī-ˈpər-bə-(ˌ)lē \
Definition of hyperbole
: extravagant exaggeration (such as "mile-high ice-cream cones")

I think you know better, so you are likely just gaslighting, like the good little liberal that you are, but if you didn't know better, then you need to rethink your attempts to come off as some sort of intellect.

You're not.

You're really, really not.

It's not hyperbole. You actually believe that

"It's not hyperbole. You actually believe that"

In this instance, what I actually believe was being used as hyperbole. Or, more accurately, ultra-hyperbole.

I think it's the sublime component that is throwing you off. I need to learn to respond in Brony to better help you understand, but I just don't have time to learn a new language.

I wonder if Rosetta Stone has a Brony component?

"I need to learn to respond in Brony to better help you understand, but I just don't have time to learn a new language"

No one else on this website has any problem understanding what I say. If you aren't capable of reading and understanding English, that's not my problem. I just wish you realized how pathetic is that you have to keep bringing up a TV show over and over to try to use as an insult against me.

"No one else on this website has any problem understanding what I say."

You must be a bot- no one is this dense to so often miss the point.

Or maybe it's because you feel the need to stalk so many at one time? Hard to keep up with, even for a professional imgflip Troll™ like yourself?

"I just wish you realized how pathetic is that you have to keep bringing up a TV show over and over to try to use as an insult against me."

Plays with children's toys/watches children's TV shows- calls someone else "pathetic".

And for the record, I am not trying to insult you, but I am making a point. I think the reason it seems like an insult is that you know something is wrong with your Bronyism.

"And for the record, I am not trying to insult you"

Yeah, you are

"I think the reason it seems like an insult is that you know something is wrong with your Bronyism"

No, it's because you bring up something irrelevant to try and use as an insult instead of addressing the actual points I'm making.

"No they didn't. Democrats in the 1860s weren't liberals"

You're a liberal, so you are wrong on all things concerning morality, history, justice, and reality.

"You're a liberal, so you are wrong on all things concerning morality, history, justice, and reality"

That is what's known as a genetic fallacy. It's a logical fallacy. Try again.

"That is what's known as a genetic fallacy. It's a logical fallacy. Try again."

Or, in your case, it is precisely the truth . . . which, of course, it is.

You think that when you label something that it is so. You spend WAY TOO MUCH TIME playing in fantasy land with the MLP stuff- reality is simply not your friend.

"Or, in your case, it is precisely the truth"

No, it's a logical fallacy. You said "you're a liberal, so you are wrong on all things concerning morality, history, justice, and reality". That is a logically flawed statement.

"reality is simply not your friend"

And yet you can never give any actual examples, just lame insults about which TV shows I like

"just lame insults about which TV shows I like"

You can hardly blame me for the "insults" being lame, given the material I have to work with. I mean, I am starting with an alleged adult male who plays with imaginary magical ponies.

The "lameness" is strictly one-sided in this instance . . .

Nah, you're starting with an adult male who watches TV shows. And let's not forget which of the two of us actually believes in talking animals. That would be you.

"And let's not forget which of the two of us actually believes in talking animals. That would be you."

I know of no extant talking animals. It seems pretty ignorant of you to think that the God Who spoke the universe into existence could not likewise have an animal speak. That was a one time event, btw, magical ponies notwithstanding.

The problem is yours.

"It seems pretty ignorant of you to think that the God Who spoke the universe into existence could not likewise have an animal speak. That was a one time event, btw"

No, it was a zero-time event. It's mythology. It never happened. Snakes and donkeys can't speak human language. The fact that you think they can, and through magical means no less, shows how detached from reality you are.