"Violence? I think the liberal slant we should be looking for is, "hate crime", racism, black supremacy, etc."
I'm calling it violence because that's what it was. If there were hate crime factors as well, so be it.
"As for the Rittenhouse case, that was an open and shut case of self-defense"
Not so open and shut when you consider that he wasn't even supposed to be there in the first place. He chose to travel to another area with a gun, an area where he knew there was violence. Instead of letting the proper authorities handle it, he wanted to play vigilante.
"but here's hoping that he and his lawyer make sure it hits the news cycle like Nick Sandmann did"
Ah yes, Nick Sandmann, the "Christian" who ignored his cult leader's command to turn the other cheek. It's funny how quick many Christians are to ignore what Jesus says when there's a big paycheck dangling in front of their face.
"You jump to wrong conclusions all the time, and then move, in this case, to ad hominem as if it makes some point"
You have any examples of me doing that?
"And this is also projection on your part- "hivemind" explains your constant reliance on the argument from authority, and your subsequent attempts to defend the use of that type of fallacy"
Which authority did I fallaciously appeal to?
"I love it when conservative commentators/organizations put together liberal media montages, where it becomes evident that all your trusted sources of news are working off the same script given to them by the Democrat Party"
I heard another conservative make this point earlier today on radio. You don't seem to understand that many media outlets get their script from a common source (which, by the way, is not the Democrat Party), so of course it's going to be identical. If you have teachers in five different schools all reading from the same textbook, does that mean they are part of a hivemind? Or does it mean they got their information from the same source?