And didn't the Moron In Chief just try to destroy the filibuster?

She was never going to be nominated. Getting her confirmed to the Federal Court through the backlash for her judicial record was pain in the ass enough, Bush was NEVER going to pick her for SCOTUS.

p.s. I apologize for the snark- I hope you read what actually happened and realize just how bad of a person Joe Biden is. As are the Democrats he has conspired with some 50 years.

Your link is garbage. I remain unconvinced by your desperate smear campaigns.

btw- Included in the article at the end of that "garbage" link is a link to the transcript of the Biden appearance on Face The Nation. He promised he would filibuster Judge Brown's nomination, just like he did, TWICE, for her nomination to a Federal position in California.

It's no one's fault but your own that you have sided with the racist Joe Biden.

AFTER the popular public backlash against her hot garbage of a judicial record. I WILL explain what a bandwagon is if you want me to, I really don't mind, you just got super indignant about it.

And here you are still excusing Joe Biden's actions, and like his appointee does not have her own bandwagon of garbage judicial records lol. I bet Janice Rogers knew what a woman was when asked, and she did not gave some BS answer. You are just as bad as they are.

She didn't know what a woman was when asked during her nomination to SCOTUS. Do you know why? Because she wasn't nominated for SCOTUS and therefore wasn't asked anything. Because nobody - left, right, nor center - liked her and Bush 2 badly needed a win at that point.

Nominated for SCOTUS or not is irrelevant, what is relevant and I guarantee you is that if you ask Janice Rogers what the definition of a woman is she will know. What is Brown's excuse?

... It most definitely IS relevant to the incorrectness of your comment as you wrote it

What is Brown's excuse? darn son, you just can't answer a question. Does it makes you uncomfortable?

Me?? I'm fine, I'm not the one who didn't know she didn't go to nomination.

I see the pattern here. It is evident that democrats can't give a straight answer whenever they know that the answer to the question makes them feel uncomfortable. Hmmm, of course you are going to defend Brown, you are just like her!

You sound like a racist misogynist. You must be a Democrat.

While I might buy that this was yet another issue that Biden got wrong, pray tell, why would Biden threaten to filibuster her nomination if she was never going to get nominated?

Liberal logic- THE definition of an oxymoron.

https://www.aei.org/op-eds/remembering-the-black-woman-biden-blocked-from-the-supreme-court/

"Ad hominem- which means you know you cannot defend your position"

Like accusing someone of being racist even if they're not

Ok, butI is it really news to you that politicians jump on popular bandwagons sometimes?

Ok, but is it really news to you that politicians jump on popular bandwagons sometimes?

"Liberal logic- THE definition of an oxymoron"

So liberals can't be logical?

Nope.

So you think it's illogical to pay women the same wages for the same work.

No, I mean liberals can't be logical.

Liberals believe that women should receive the same pay for the same work. You said liberals can't be logical. Therefore you're saying that position is illogical.

You think it's logical for a man to cheat in women's sports.

No I don't

You're the one who said "liberals can't be logical. That means that any position a liberal has, even if you agree with it, you think it's illogical. You are being very unreasonable.

To even bring that thoroughly debunked lie up is a great example proving our point- very illogical of you!

One wonders why the big meanie Capitalists don't ONLY hire women. If the nonsense lie was true, they would INSTANTLY save 30% on the most expensive budget line on the typical P&L statement.

You never fail to disappoint. The real Ovtavia would never fail like this.

"To even bring that thoroughly debunked lie up is a great example proving our point- very illogical of you!"

So you're saying that has never happened?

"One wonders why the big meanie Capitalists don't ONLY hire women. If the nonsense lie was true, they would INSTANTLY save 30% on the most expensive budget line on the typical P&L statement."

Because of sexism

Literally just yesterday I was speaking with a woman who worked as a security guard, a position that could be done by women the same as men. She had to fight for that job and only got it because the company she worked for was so discriminatory, the government finally had to step in and do something about it.

So your question here is "if corporations were to be colluding on pressuring women out of the workforce, why aren't they hiring only women?" Do I have that right? That's your train of thought here?