Imgflip Logo Icon

I Bet He's Thinking About Other Women

I Bet He's Thinking About Other Women Meme | I bet he's thinking about other women. Where did all the matter in the universe come from if matter can't be created or destroyed? | image tagged in memes,i bet he's thinking about other women | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
13,799 views 243 upvotes Made by anonymous 3 years ago in fun
I Bet He's Thinking About Other Women memeCaption this Meme
54 Comments
9 ups, 3y,
6 replies
Matter CAN be created and destroyed. Matter and antmatter destroy each other, causing a flash of energy according to this quite well known equation:

E=mc² <=> m=E/c²

To answer your question, everything in the universe traces back to one single spot, where big bang took place. What it was that created an exploding universe out of void, no one knows.

There are a few ideas, such as an imploding former universe, pure chance, or quantum physics that would take some hundred pages to explain.

However, neither of these is even close to a proven theory status. So untill we are able to prove something, we have no better explaination than that God did it.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Which God did make the universe...
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Rick Ashley | IN MY RELIGION THERE IS ONLY ONE GOD | image tagged in rick ashley | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 3y
Yes
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
it can also be destroyed by anti-atoms
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
I wrote that. I may just have made a typos and written ”antmatter” instead of ”antimatter”
0 ups, 3y
*(NERD ALERT)*
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
*(NERD ALERT)*
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
*(SPAM ALERT)*
2 ups, 3y
(SPAM ALERT)
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
hem, matter cant be created or destroyed, and matter and antimatter dont destroy each other.

For what_is_reality: all the matter in our universe came from an almost infinitely small and almost infinitely dense particle that explode creating the big bang
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Even if ignoring the theoretical evidence, it still remains a fact that scientists have synthesized animatter. That antimatter did very clearly destroy both itself and the innermost part of its container, causing a flash of energy.
0 ups, 3y
hem, nope
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Your description of Big Bang is almost accurate. The ”particle” wasn't just almost infinetly small and almost infinetly dense. It WAS infinetly small and infinetly dense. This is called a singularity, and is also used to describe the center of a black hole.
0 ups, 3y
k
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
THANK YOU.
0 ups, 3y
Conservation of matter is also a thing
0 ups, 3y
*(NERD ALERT)*
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
"However, neither of these is even close to a proven theory status. So untill we are able to prove something, we have no better explaination than that God did it."

Nobody has ever demonstrated that any gods exist, so we can't say that a god is even a possible explanation for the origin of matter or the universe.

You may as well say "we don't know who killed this person, so we have no better explanation than that Napoleon built a time machine and came to our time and killed the person then instantly disappeared"
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Philosophists have proven it impossible to disprove God. However, I agree that it is very unlikely that God created big bang, but as with time travelling Napoleon, we can't be sure untill we find a good explaination, which I hope we do.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
"Philosophists have proven it impossible to disprove God"

It depends on which God you're talking about. Some definitions of God are logically contradictory and therefore can't exist
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I'm talking about God in terms of a creator of the universe. The reasoning goes like this:

If we want to disprove God, we have to discover what actually created the universe (big bang). However, it will then be possible to claim that God did instead create the thing that we just discovered.

In order to disprove this new definition of God, we have to discover what actually created the thing that created the universe (complicated quantum physics?). However, it will then be possible to claim that God did instead create the thing that we just discovered.

In order to disprove this new definition of God, we have to discover what actually created the thing that created the thing that created the universe (unknown). However, it will then be possible to claim that God did instead create the thing that we just discovered.

And so on…

So no matter what we do, we can never disprove God.
1 up, 3y
I agree that it's pretty much impossible to prove that a god doesn't exist, if you're talking about a general sort of god of Deism
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
*(NERD ALERT)*
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I'm a teacher. I'm supposed to be smart.
0 ups, 3y
*(Nerd Teacher Alert)* Ima 10 years old kid
4 ups, 3y
Christian God
nobody allowed to question it without getting harrassed
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
listen guys, this was my first ever meme. I tried my best and happened to remember a random shower thought i had the other day, so please, cut me some slack.
2 ups, 3y
No. Now we must uncover the mysteries of the universe. and you will be of great contribution to human history wether you like it or not. O.o
1 up, 3y
You don't have to come up with with excuses. Your very first meme is within front page reach. It's a great success.
2 ups, 3y
The big bang is really confusing, but basically as ive heard it, there was a constant struggle between matter and nothing, and somehow, matter won and just gained about 300,000,000 miles of matter in about 2.1 seconds
1 up, 3y
the same question can be said about god, except as the hitchhikers guide says gods were created a few millionths of a second after the big bang, and are not the creators of our universe.
1 up, 3y
in the beginning all the matter was compressed into a singularity, or even smaller, but all the energy had to expand so all of the matter spread out 1.5 trillion miles in 5 seconds, creating the universe
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Matter is basically cold, low speed energy. So yeah. The good news is that if matter isn't usually destroyed it can be recombined
Aka reincarnation.
1 up, 3y
Reincarnation? Wtf lol
1 up, 3y
yay
1 up, 3y
Does it matter?
1 up, 3y
i cant find the butter robot but only the oh my god, so i'll do it myself

*ahem*

O H M Y G O D .
0 ups, 3y
I bet this whole thing turned into a conspiracy
0 ups, 3y
this is what keeps me up at night
0 ups, 3y
oh my god
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
The Big Bang was everywhere not just one spot. And it wasn’t a bang
0 ups, 3y
Big Bang originated from only one spot, known as a singulatity. It was indeed everywhere, since all universe existed in that very spot. In terms wether or not it was a bang, it didn't make sound waves, but it did make gravity waves. Rather than an explotion, it was a very quick expantion.
0 ups, 3y
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
FIRST OF ALL THERE ARE NO NERDS SECOND OF ALL GOD CANT DO ANYTHING TO CREATE THE UNIVERSE THE UNIVERSE MADE IT SELF! STILL DONT BELIVE ME? WELL GOD FIGHTS DEMONS NOT IN SPACE SO ITS IMPOSSIBLE HE MADE THE UNIVERSE UT MADE IT SELF THIRD OF ALL MATTER DID NOT MAKE THE UNIVERSE IT GOT CREATED FROM THE BIG BANG
0 ups, 3y
There's no shame in believing what you believe, except on your part, who can't even keep your caps under control because you're too pissed off. Grow up.
0 ups, 3y
Honestly I need answers for this question
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
chat
imma say my theory
0 ups, 3y
0 ups, 3y
AND MATTER ARE IN OTHER UNHIVERSES NOT THE AREA WHERE BIG BANG APPEARED
Show More Comments
I Bet He's Thinking About Other Women memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
I bet he's thinking about other women. Where did all the matter in the universe come from if matter can't be created or destroyed?