You accuse vaccine skeptics of spreading misinformation but you aren't even properly informed about the facts of the vaccines

CDC Director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky admits that that the vaccines don't stop the transmission of covid, they just reduce the severity of covid in the person who takes the vaccine, you can still get infected with covid and be asymptomatic and unknowingly spread the virus to others. Here is the clip of her being interviewed on CNN: https://mobile.twitter.com/cnnsitroom/status/1423422301882748929

She is basically saying that the vaccinated are about as likely to carry the virus as the unvaccinated and being vaccinated doesn't make you exempt from covid protocols, that's why testing for both the unvaccinated and vaccinated are still in place.

And besides, many fully vaccinated nations that have vaccine passport systems had a high surge of covid cases, the majority of those cases being in the fully vaccinated than the unvaccinated.

"Reduce the severity"
Read that again but slowly

It's a slight, marginal reduction - assuming that they don't cheat and distort their studies and terminology deliberately. And they do all of that. Did you not hear about the Whistleblower from the Pfizer trials, reported upon by the British Medical Journal? It doesn't look good... 61c17w.jpg (click to show)

This is not a magical reduction!!!!!!

It's a magical INCREASE. They had almost no infections prior to the jabs

...... that spike IS prior to jabs!!!

ai notice you are flailing now that people are standing up to the vaxxnazis. Remember Nuremberg.

Would you like a polio vaccine that reduced the severity but not eliminated the disease? So, like you wouldn't spend the rest of your life in a wheelchair, but you'd have to use crutches?

They shouldn't call it a vaccine if it isn't. call it a "proactive severity reducer".

Notice how vaxxers are the same people that want to control every aspect of your life? Mostly DemoKKKrat, of course.

I'm really not. Vaccinated people spread the disease at one-fiftieth the rate that the unvaccinated do. The disease would be endemic and all this would be over if y'all got your shots too.

Never taking your death jab. Sorry your vaccine doesn't work if someone else isn't vaxxed. Too bad for the vaxxnazis.

My vaccine DOES work. I'm spreading the disease at a much lower rate than you are, which is a vaccine's job. But you're still spreading the disease, though, because you're not jabbed.

You have to CATCH IT - before you can spread it... Luckily you won't be spreading your myocarditis, auto-immune disorders, neurological problems, vascular issues like clotting disorders, thrombocytopenia, strokes, etc.. Good luck with the solution that they were waiting to roll-out under the cover of an "emergency" that they created ... They skipped the Animal tests, and you're the longterm study.

Yes, and when you're vaccinated you spread the disease you've caught fifty times less than you are right now that you're not vaccinated. Am I using words that are too long for you?

Yeah... That's JUST NOT TRUE... UNLESS - you define "vaccinated" to mean the period between 14 days after your second shot - and then ending 90 days later. And it still isn't the case. Vermont and Michigan highly jabbed - highly infected.

Vaccines helping in Michigan

Explain that. I see three peaks. Don't seem to be working as well as Ivermectin in Uttar Pradesh, or Japan or Mexico. And BTW - you're relying on inaccurate numbers. PCR Tests produce false positives at ridiculous rates over 35 cycles. But the CDC advises that the there be different rates for "vaccinated" and "unvaccinated".

Ok, so, Sesame Street does a really good explanation on this: when you count numbers, the amount that numbers represent changes each time, so that two different numbers represent that one is actually bigger than the other.

Statistically significant...? They look very comparable to the naked eye. I wonder why Africa has no real issues with Covid? It couldn't be Ivermectin, could it?

Citation Needed.

The Countries with no jabs have fared the best - in Africa, and worldwide.

A 50-60% lower death spike is definitely statistically significant.

And no, it couldn't. Africa absolutely has had covid issues, you're wrong about that too.

India and Japan both used medicines shills like you cried about. hey, if you were serious why wouldn't you want effective medicines?

oh yes, you shill for phara. for free LELELELELEL

Yeah, they used vaccines. Like they're supposed to

Also death WITH a positive swab - isnot the sane thing as FROM Covid. There's a big pikeof bodies... If you dig down into them - you find people who were shot, fell off of roofs, alcohol poisoning, traffic fatalities, etc.. The name of the game is fear porn - because it makes people like you easy to manipulate.

So by sheer absolute coincidence, the number of people who died of alcohol poisoning but just happened to have COVID also went down after the jab?

Well, DEFINITELY go get vaccinated if it's helping with alcohol poisoning and helping you to keep balance on your roof as well!!!!!!!!!

The CDC are a drug manufacturers' front. That's who pays the bills. They have a whole PR Department that knows how to massage the numbers and definitions to work the narrative as needed.

Here's a fluke... No statistically significant increase in all cause mortalities, during the first 9 months of Covid.

https://web.archive.org/web/20201126163323/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19

I see. So the analysis in that paper was wrong? Not even JHU (an Event201 partner) said that... They just didn't like the way that the numbers implied that there was no overall increase in deaths - while the panic was in full effect.

And like I said. They keep changing the way they measure and test, and for whom - depending on the results that the narrative demands.

Attorney Jeff Childers' got access to the med records in Alachua County Florida, early in the Plandemic. Sadly, they shut that down real quick. But he found death by misadventure being classified as Covid. Rooftop guy... PCR swabbed on his way to the morgue. But the important thing was numbers ... And the financial incentives are there to bolster the right conclusions, for the Doctor, the hospitals, and the bereaved families. If you say it was Covid - the burial get paid for.

Ok. But if you believe that the vaccine is helping you keep balance on rooftops and hold your alcohol, then what else is there left to discuss? That's the most amazing vaccine that's ever been invented!!

(The deaths absolutely are statistically significant by an extremely strong margin. It's not even close. Your understanding of statistical significance is holding you back here.)

Why don't they [Jab]?

Vaccines helping in Michigan prior to omicron. By the way, Michigan is only at 65% vaxxed - you many people like you holding up the infection rate.

*Vermont, I meant

And here I am exercising my right to refuse Human Medical Experimentation - and not sick at all ... So strange. I guess I'm just unaware, of how I'm infecting all of these "protected" and injected folks.

If you're unaware of how you're spreading a virus then you should definitely be listening instead of talking. That's basic stuff. That's stuff that Sesame Street teaches.

You have to HAVE IT - to spread it, child. And please show me a non-mathematical model study - that proves asymptomatic spread.

Funny that you should mention the things being taught by Sesame Street... imgflip.com/i/6097im 6097im.jpg (click to show)

No thanks, you can have the risk of myocarditis. Smart people didn't take an experimental untested gene therapy. Glad you did though, even you know how stupid it was hence your crab in the bucket routine LEL

"fifty times less"? Got a study for that or did you just pull that out of your rectum?

That's not the job of a vaccine "any preparation used as a preventive inoculation to confer immunity against a specific disease, usually employing an innocuous form of the disease agent, as killed or weakened bacteria or viruses, to stimulate antibody production."

Even if it were included in the definition, it's obviously not 100% effective by your own admission, so what's the point?

Vaccinated and nonvaccinated are both spreading the disease.

Why are you spreading the disease if you know that you have it?

I meant, believe in misinformation, if you are unaware that the vaccines don't stop the spread then you are misinformed about the vaccines, the very thing you accuse vaccine skeptics of being. Also, given the fact that fully vaccinated nations had a high surge of Omicron cases, the majority of which are in the vaccinated rather than the unvaccinated, that also debunks the notion that the unvaccinated are too blame. Also, the virus is becoming a less dangerous endemic right now, Omicron has reached it's peak and cases are declining, the WHO says that Omicron is a sign of the pandemic ending and becoming an endemic. The virus has run its course. The UK recently ended all covid restrictions including masks and vaccine passports, everything is basically back to normal in the UK and people are happily living their lives again without any need for any covid restrictions.

Vaccinated people spread the disease at one-fiftieth the rate that the unvaccinated do. You skipped that part out entirely.

That's just nonsense. Gibraltar is at 115% jab rate (they give 'em to tourists, as well) and has never had worse numbers, even pre-jab. The UK keeps better Stats than we do - and they have a high rate of acceptance of the unsafe, ineffective, human medical experimentation gene therapy. 623qk8.jpg (click to show) Iceland, Ireland, Israel - all disprove your thesis. Africa has exceedingly low infection rates - and low rate of jabs. Omicron was SENT THERE, with 4 spooks travelling on Diplomatic passports... Country unnamed. But it peaked and has already begun receding. Early Treatment, and prophylaxis with cheap, safe and effective treatments like HCq/Quercetin +Zinc, Vitamin D3, Ivermectin, even Fluvoxamine - all make much more sense than the Jabs... And in case you're unaware - highly jabbed places are seeing dramatic increases in all causes mortality numbers.

Behold your wrongness in all its glory.

Except that you're adding the wrong date for the Roll-out. That spike happens AFTER they got the jabs.

And he went for the double down!!!! This is starting to get painful to watch now, somebody call an ambulance before he gets really hurt.

The ambulances are all being used for the jab injured and their increased all cause mortality. And I don't see a date there. 61o5li.jpg (click to show)

I literally put a dot on the graph to show the date. I think the problem here is there's just something wrong with your screen. Or even your ability to read.

I was looking down, not up. But there's this weird bump in July - assuming that the stats are accurate...and I'm not ready to assume that. Odd. That's worse than all of the prior period... except early February... What explains early February? Jabbed travelers from England and Spain perhaps? I think you're looking at the numbers as a form of confirmation bias ... If the Jabs really protected people - odd that there's these bumps in Oct/Nov, hmmm?

And what creates the evolutionary pressure to FORCE mutations? Not the jabs, is it? And what about Antibody Dependent Enhancement? That doesn't seem to factor into your calculations.

So you're saying that the injections - which are ALWAYS going to be months behind the Variants that they create - don't offer the same kind of robust protection as natural immunity, then...

And you probably should go easy with your $hitLib assumptions about who has information and who doesn't, junior. James Lyons-Weiler (PhD) could bring you up to speed on the science you're missing - and show you where the junk science and Event201 propaganda gets things wrong.

Are you thinking you're better informed than Dr. Robert Malone, or Vaccinologist Geert Vanden Bosche? I don't see that.

Except that they're a tourist destination. And the rest of Spain and England bstarted getting their jabs in December... And that's who visits and spreads things to them. Overall, looking at that graph...it looks like pre-vaccines was the best time for Gibraltar.

That was Delta. It doesn't surprise me that you haven't heard about that - you're quite a low-information person in general - but it was all over the news.

Early February is literally the entire point I'm making: that was the situation prior to the vaccination itself!!!!!!!!!!!!!!