What is it really about??

is this why China is allowed to get away with this?

The only overpopulation I see are in liberal places like NYC or LA.

They must know better. Tell me, are you a PHD?

-Every leftist ever.

Its totally stupid though. You can find TED talks of Gates saying he wants to reduce the population of the United States.

PhDs are the most hesitant to get the death jab.

Not exactly. From what I have seen, its about 75% to 25% (75 being accepting of it and 25 being not).

perhaps it's changed now

Maybe

Correct

When people say the earth is overpopulated, they often don’t take into account deserts, and other empty areas. The sad reality is everyone wants to live in a city

But their kids end up moving away to the cities anyway

That’s usually for jobs, which the internet is now allowing to be done remotely.

Fairs

Some have crunched the numbers and calculated that you could fit the entire world's population into the State of Texas, depending on how crowded you want it to be.

We're not even close to running out of room, nor of resources.

Klaus Schwab wrote COVID 19 THE GREAT RESET. Read Bertrand Russell. listen to gates. they want to destroy society and rebuild and arise as gods with the reminants slaves. you hear about anyone like Soros dying of covid?????

Every deeply held policy and ideology of the Left finds its righteous opposite in the Word of God.

The Left says, "ThE wOrLd iS oVeRpOpuLaTed!!!"

God says,
And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the Earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”

Yes exactly. We are taking health advice from the same people who think we need to fix overpopulation. Shouldn’t that tell you something? Especially since it’s leftists doing it.

Have you seen the lame attempt by "fact-checkers" to cover up the WHO Director's comment about some countries using the vaxxes to kill children? Basically, he stuttered over his words, so he didn't say what you heard him say. Idiots!

Do you have a video?

https://newsrescue.com/who-director-general-some-countries-are-using-to-give-boosters-to-kill-children-which-is-not-right-is-better-to-vaccinate-the-elderly-video/

That is super interesting...Thanks.

wtf

Wowwwww

Yes, I personally do, but what does that have to with what they said?

But he told us to follow one god! Thats arrogance!!! How dare the creator demand that. You atheists are even more cringy then the evangelical cult. Even MORE of a cult. Hilarious

Haha gee well, at that time you could choose to worship a few. Most were baby sacrificing cults. But hmmmm, no lying no cheating no murder plus it saying render onto caeser so your crap about slavery doesn't matter because it's rightfully outlawed now. You want to cry about freedom of religion? Well sometimes when you are given freedom some will take advantage of it and abuse others. You want to argue like it's real okay then you have to play within the rules.

But i get rules like no murder no cheating no lying isnt as flashy as degeneracy and sacrificing babies to you.

Sure because you grew up in a society that was HEAVILY influenced by religion. You think youd feel the same in some small tribe somewhere without religion? The Romans considered ANYONE NOT ROMAN TO BE SUBHUMAN AND KILLED WITHOUT MERCY.

Yet you, raised in a Christian society tells me xtian values had no effect on you.

Still, you take me as stupid and do this playing dumb bullshit.

The Hebrews got that from God.

Cause God put in most people a sense of morals.

Um,,,

Yeah, name some earlier rules. Hammurabi code? That pretty tolerant?

Howd the Romans treat people? Did THEY have slaves?

Lel sorry atheist i grew up with religion. I myself can reject organized religion and stil understand there is a creator. It's more 'magic' to think everything came from nothing. LEL

Well there were no living cells then there was. How did THAT happen?

Atheists never answer that question. They just seem so sure it's not any God.

Okay yet you laugh at xtians for their theories.

Look there was a vid put out by Harvard in like 2005 showing what happens in a cell. It's mindboggling. The most complicated thing you could see. We have billions of braincells. How can this happen by chance? We are the only species on earth like us.

Yes, because xtians are only about slavery.

Why don't you cry about the CURRENT slave markets in Libya.

Oh right. That'd be RACIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh and it was brought to the world by President Obama, ironically enough, so yet ANOTHER aspect you can't criticize because RACISM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now tell us how the commandment are evil. Don't steal don't lie don't murder don't covet thy neighbors wife. Yep horrible things that would destroy society.

Actually, the Bible instructs husbands to love their wives and show them honor as fellow heirs of the grace of life, if the husbands don't want their prayers ignored.

If the founding fathers really put that into law, Muslims wouldn't have been allowed in the country. Yet, they've been here for decades. The Bible never said leadership should be like what Charlemagne did. The Magna Carta was created because a council of Christian people felt that the Christian king was abusing his God-given rights by being oppressive to people with different opinions than him (interestingly enough, they would put up with a lot b4 they came to this conclusion). In other words, they felt like the Bible was against what the king was doing. The Bible would never support any dictatorship like communism or Nazism.

And none of that was encouraged in the New Testament. Did you also know that the Bible says that "Joseph, being a righteous man and not wanting to kill [Mary], planned to send her away secretly" when he found she was pregnant before their marriage? It actually called him "righteous" for not doing that.

I meant the man would simply steal girls from their families without any sort of agreement. Even with Isaac, they asked Rebekah if she'd go with his servant (who by the way is another example of someone who cared for his master because he wasn't being mistreated).

That decision was never looked upon as a good decision. Matter of fact, a whole rival family who would kill many of his promised son's descendants was born because of that event, so it didn't even go unpunished.
Also she probably did want to, because she started acting conceited around her mistress when she realized she was pregnant and her mistress was barren. It probably made her feel more important than her mistress. But like I said, that decision was never meant to be respected.

And many do allow it. I'm not going to pretend I know the Bible's stance on that, but if it does say that, there might be reasoning behind it. For example, this whole idea of "first woman to do something" or "gender diversity" ideas might be prioritized in church over teaching the actual Bible, and I don't think God would have any interest in that. That's a subject I've thought a lot about, since I (and many ppl ik) am by no means hostile toward women or their rights.

The New Testament was written by Roman pagans. Hence the immense disconnect from the Old. It doesn't count.

"Jesus was prophesied about as early as Genesis 3"
Is he Serpent God or the Cherubim? Good grief.

Saul/Paul, killer of Christians, tool of the Beast? Sure, toss out THE Word because of that murderer said to. Gotta give him credit though, "If you can't beat em, make em join you." He literally upped Peter "But even though I betrayed Jesus THREE times he put me in charge, yup!" one, and replaced that con with his paganism. Son of Jackal, Seated in Rome, who will steal the Word of the Chosen and call it their own, but ot before corrupting it beyond recognition. Yeah, wonder who that is.

"And there are historical accounts besides the Bible explaining why Pilate acted the way he did."

No there isn't. And nothing referring to Jesus.

I'mma stop here because you won't like were this is going, and if the only thing holding you back from OKing slavery and murder is that faith, then I'd rather not rock it, not that you would listen anyways.

The Old Testament isn't what Christians are told to follow now, is it? Treating women like trash was completely normal then, and even then God had rules about it. Matter of fact, one of the reasons the Flood happened was that God saw men were just taking whatever woman they pleased, without any consent.

Also, women are told not to be spiritual leaders to men (which some churches ignore btw). But women are allowed to exist in church.

I never said it did.

Except if you look at what the founding fathers believed, they were very Christian and put a lot of their religious beliefs into law. They had no interest in dictatorship. And if leftists ever read a history book, they'd know that many founding fathers were actually anti-slavery themselves, feeling it was hypocritical to want to escape dictatorship while being oppressive themselves.

Last I checked, I'm not rotting in a cell because of the last hostile thought I had about Him. If you were talking about Greek or Roman gods, I'd see your point. (They were basically Twitter before Twitter existed)

Judges 24:19-25 on rape... yes, that's why that line is next to the citation.
Is this that difficult for you to understand?

https://atheistforum.wordpress.com/2013/07/09/does-tacitus-provide-independent-testimony-about-jesus/

"No. "He shall bruise you on the head, and you will bruise him on the heel" in Genesis 3:15 is God indirectly prophesying about how He will send Jesus. He said it to Satan.

Jesus as a bruise, or is it heel?
No one said anything to Satan in Genesis because Satan was never mentioned in Genesis.

"Pilate's decision making was largely affected by the Roman emperor wanting to keep the Jews happy..."

Nonsense. A Roman governor trying to appease a people he's oppressing?
There is no such mention anywhere else of any such ludicrous practice by Pilate or anyone.

Everything except 3 verses were from the Old Testament. Also maybe look up what stuff in the Bible means before denoting the whole book as sexist.

Like I said, you should actually learn about things before you start debunking them. Paul was Roman, but none of the other apostles were. They were all Jewish, and Jesus was Jewish.
Also whole books of the New Testament exist to show how the Old Testament is just a precursor to Jesus. Matter of fact, Jesus was prophesied about as early as Genesis 3. In the Old Testament, it says that the people wouldn't recognize Him, which they didn't, because they were too adherent to their man made traditions. None of the New Testament has anything to do with Rome (besides tax payment) until Pilate gets involved. And there are historical accounts besides the Bible explaining why Pilate acted the way he did. Then Paul begins preaching to other people. You can't discredit the New Testament. If you do, then you seriously have to discredit the entire Muslim faith even more, since it originally claimed to be the uncorrupted version.

No. "He shall bruise you on the head, and you will bruise him on the heel" in Genesis 3:15 is God indirectly prophesying about how He will send Jesus. He said it to Satan.

Apparently people can't change then. Once a crook, always a crook. The man literally suffered for the faith like all the others. He didn't get much worldly possessions from his conversion. All he got was that the people who supported him now hated him. But now the modern idea is to act like being an apostle was some special life. It wasn't, besides the supernatural things recorded. Many people would not be able to bear their lives.

Oh, so you've checked everything, I guess? Since you stated that so much like a matter of fact. One thing I would suggest is to never definitively act as if something doesn't exist in history. It's so vast you don't know what it contains.
There actually is a writer who mentioned Jesus around 60 AD, and he didn't worship Jesus. Pilate's decision making was largely affected by the Roman emperor wanting to keep the Jews happy because a really wicked man who had tried to betray him (named Sejanus, if you've never heard the name) was anti-Semitic. Because the Jews knew they could appeal to Tiberius the emperor if Pilate didn't give them what they wanted, it was extremely difficult for him to refuse them. It's far more complicated than what I just described, but I learned none of this from the Bible (since everything that comes from there can never be true to an atheist)

I've already expressed my views on those in these comments. I'm not doing it again.

Wow. I didn't even read most of this chart last night, but this legit is possibly the dumbest interpretation of Bible verses that I've ever seen. So many verses are taken out of context. Some of the problems (ike female inferiority) aren't even specific, and the "Rape my daughter" was from the book of Judges, where everyone did what was right in their own eyes.
I could go on about this for hours but maybe you should actually read the Bible instead of pulling memes off the internet that are meant to make people hate it.

That's very true. Democrats seem very keen on opposing everything God says these days.

I personally believe slavery should be outlawed (more on that later). The Bible never said to have slaves, but that slaves should respect their masters. This leads me to believe that God's stance on slavery is similar to His stance on kings. If you notice, God never wanted Israel to have a king, but gave them one because they demanded it. He told them to submit to the king if they had one, even if he was hostile. God wants us to respect authority we're under, but that doesn't mean He agrees with the system.

The reason I think slavery should be outlawed is the same reason I don't think we should have kings (or communist dictators, because they're even worse). The Bible has rules and regulations for both kings and slaves, which are most often ignored by people. What slave owners did 160 years ago was not okay according to the Bible. This is why full-on Christians like Harriet Tubman fled. In my opinion, whenever there's too much power in one hand, an unbiblical abuse of power follows. This is why I'm anti-slavery, anti-monarchy, and anti-communist, and have full Biblical justification to have these stances.

"So basically you're saying that instead of prohibiting slavery because he's the one who actually makes all the rules, God chose to let people own slaves because...they demanded it? Does he have to give in to their demands?"

I never said people demanded slaves. Authority came with the fall. Men running families came with the fall. And no, God doesn't have to give into people's demands, but He has granted people their dumb requests before.

My point is that God never banned kings even though He clearly was against the idea (just look at Manasseh to understand why), and the same would hold true for slavery. Matter of fact, Egyptian monarchs were abusing Israelites (to a degree I won't go into detail about to keep the site sfw) and God delivered them from it. American slavery was also abusive in a way I won't go into detail about.

This makes the whole Biblical slavery question irrelevant, but anyway I will mention that one time in the Old Testament someone got leprosy and their slave girl didn't want the master to die bc they treated her like family, and so she told them of a prophet, who eventually healed the master. Such treatment to slaves was extremely rare in America (I do know of instances where similar things happened, however because I read about history a lot).

God created us, so whether you or I agree with Him is really beside the point. However, He gave us rules and allows us to live comfortably on this earth, whether we hate His guts all day and night. Hate a slave master, king, or communist, and you're going to get hunted and tormented.

No, people who are pro-slavery are misunderstanding the Bible. It doesn't matter what people say; the Bible says what it says and means what it means. I've seen people try to use the Bible to promote hatred when the Bible says to love your enemies. Does that mean the Bible says what they're saying, or are they misusing the Bible?

So all Christians are children?

Just look at this and what it's a reply to:

imgflip.com/i/61lrli?nerp=1642580967#com16800759

I can only hope he's trolling, because wOw,,,

But rail against Whites for something that happened 150 years ago, that's safe and will make you feel superior.

Uh yes. Wow that was an arguement lol.

Nope. People did own slaves/servants in the Bible though. The Bible also doesn’t say that all mean are equal either,

God allowed all kinds of things and you pick slavery? And God didn’t create everyone equal. He even says it in the Bible

Yes I do agree with slavery being terrible, it was a part of Gods plan of redemption and eventually to show slavery was wrong.

He uses that to help us better understand Him.

Correct, Yahweh was the God of the Hebrews and the Word refers to them as His Chosen.
Gentiles are infidels, heathens. They do not count.

No they do count

Well, since in addition to the 144,000 Sainted Chosen that will enter the Pearly Gates, a few Gentiles will be also as judged by the righteousnes of their works, so sure, a few do.

144,000 sainted chosen?? That ain’t Christianity ain’t that like Jehovah’s Witness or Mormon or something?

Ah but that’s not judgement day according to the NT

Oh, but it is.
Welcome to Judgement Day according to the NT.

almost like satanists/freemasons/elite cabals want to everything the opposite of what god says. just look at what they did to family.

and communists

Socialism was based on man playing God, so if you don't like God, you shouldn't like leftism either. Liberals are another picture, I actually agree with liberals a lot more than I do leftists

A system where the government gets all the money and makes all the rules is man playing God.

Yes, they are. Leftism (not liberalism) isn't that far from communism anymore, and Marx himself said socialism was basically his idea. The only difference between socialists and communists is that some socialists won't condone the 200M+ lives claimed from killing spree after killing spree and the forced abortions under Stalin, but there are some who will. If you don't believe that, I recently have argued with people who have actually justified Stalin's killing the amount of people he killed. The man outdid Hitler in his death count without including forced abortions.

A system where the government gets all the money and makes all the rules is man playing God is called a Monarchy, who literally tradionally claimed to be appointed by God or claimed to be descended from a demi-God class, or even claimed to be Gods.

Socialism is when the workers control the means of production. That's a heckuva lotta Gods godding by commitee.

#1 in death tally for the sake of nation is by far England, with three centuries and countless millions (some in India claim clocking past a billion) under their God Monarchy belts.

- unless you count the whole of Christendom.

Socialism is when the government distributes the money however they please, while lying to the people that they decide how productions run.

Also, monarchies existed far before any Christians did, so maybe look longer than a span of 1300 years in history before arguing about God and kings.

England was a conquering nation with kings. They did that before capitalism existed. And Christians have had far more persecution against them than for them (which, by the way, wasn't supported by the Bible or even all those Christians then).
But China's first dictator killed 65 million of his own country.

No,
No,
&
No.

Okay, be ignorant then.

You're winging nonsense reflective not just of ignrance regarding basic terms and history, but even of the religion you claim to preach.
1300 years? What part of 2022AD doth thou not understandeth?

So Christians and monarch-run countries are persecuting people right now???