What about the coat and backpack on other people?
Why weren't they gunned down, too?
If it's correct to ASSume that she was armed, then it would be dangerous for Byrd to *not* assume anyone else with a coat and backpack was not armed. But he didn't shoot anyone else... did he?
Simple logic, right? So simple that libtards cannot comprehend it.
Libtards like you, who seem to think it's OK for the govt to kill its own citizens, have never answered that question (to be fair, at least not answered it that I've seen, and I've asked it many times.)
Because if you believe it was correct to kill her, then by that same logic, everyone else who stormed the capitol that day should have also been killed.
And that, my stuttering, libtard friend, would have made for a massacre. Using your own logic, you would have been OK with a massacre, too.
Right?