Backwards triggered liberal

I don't understand the Babbitt beef, or the constant harping about it... it's odd.
Maybe he thinks they were really trying to threaten our democracy LOLOLOL
just kidding, nobody believes that.

you know , I can respect a troll, but a troll has got to be good at what they do.. and when I see stutters comments being ignored by even his left wing compadres , damn dude.. it is time to drop that ashli line and move on.. that kid been using that tired ass garbage for weeks with 0 responses from either side, lmfao.

Lol, true. Maybe Babbitt dissed him in high school or something haha.

she turned him down for a date because everyone knew he had herpes.

yup. we both went to trump university :)

i get paid per post :)

then why did they do it?

They felt betrayed & pissed off, they wanted to be heard. Not the same as overthrowing the government.

so why did they break in?

thank you :)

He should be let off. He killed a terrorist.

And there it is. Suddenly the king of trolls cares about rioters being shot.

ashli wasn't rioting. she was antifa.

That's who I was referring to.

Like when Tyrone the Australian pimp bitchslapped your w**re mother. Gotta give credit where credit is due!

So you've got absolutely no response at all.

Your w**re mom is all you got?

Uh yeah, we've all seen the vids so your blurry photos mean nothing.

Accept when you believe they support your opinion lolol

Clear case of self defense. Sorry your pedo and felons had to die but they made their choice. And their choice resulted in CONSEQUENCES.

*except
Yep you bet. ;)

Fairly lame takes.

Of course you will state that. Facts you don't like are going to be dismissed by you. Case closed HAHA

We have already already stated that Kyle in fact 100% has the right to defend himself.

As long as it is actually justified.

Thus far every single person who claims to suppport his actions on social media that is has presented ZERO!!! facts that can prove his "fear" of being chased was legal justification for the 1st shooting.

YOU will never admit that "IF" Kyle did in fact point that weapon at people and was NOT being attacked when he did it was committting a crime.

And if he did commit that crime EVERYONE present had the legal right to fear for their safety and the legal right to make a citizen arrest

That is the law

Up to the Jury now

Piss off. You DO NOT have the right to assault people, PERIOD.

"Facts you don't like are going to be dismissed by you. "

Still waiting for you to present an actual fact. Well, at least one that's not your opinion presented as a fuzzy fact.

"We have already already stated that Kyle in fact 100% has the right to defend himself."

So in your esteemed legal opinion, being chased by a mob, being on the verge of having your head kicked in, and having a loaded gun pointed at you isn't sufficient grounds for self defense?

Oh, wait! Not when it's a Trump supporter, because libtard mentality says they've all forfeited their Constitutional rights.

"YOU will never admit that "IF" Kyle did in fact point that weapon at people and was NOT being attacked when he did it was committting a crime."

You just keep getting dumber and dumber. IF he was not being chased, and IF he was not under imminent threat of extreme harm, and IF he didn't have a loaded weapon pointed at him first (which the prosecution witness admitted under oath) then YES... IF all those IFs are true, he had no right to kill anyone.

As usual, you FAIL.

Everything you just stated you purposely are either flat out lying about or being misleading

So in your esteemed legal opinion, being chased by a mob, being on the verge of having your head kicked in, and having a loaded gun pointed at you isn't sufficient grounds for self defens

PAY ATTENTION: It would be self defense as long as Kyle did not point the weapon at people BEFORE being chased down.

The Prosecution is using evidence that was introduced by the DEFENSE to try and prove that Kyle provoked the crowd by pointing his AR15 at people

We are not claiming Kyle pointed the weapon at people The Prosecution is got it? And they are using an exibit from the Defense

If he actually did point the AR15 at people and the Prosecution proves it? He can not claim self defense agianst the "Mob"

Pointing a gun illegally is a crime so if they prove it that he did it NO AMOUNT of crying by you will change it.

Only you fail. You fail at being a rational person who is willing to see reality

"Everything you just stated you purposely are either flat out lying about or being misleading"

You can say whatever you want, but until you catch me stating a fact that's misleading or untrue, you're just blowing hot air out of the hole beneath your nose.

"So in your esteemed legal opinion, being chased by a mob, being on the verge of having your head kicked in, and having a loaded gun pointed at you isn't sufficient grounds for self defens"

No, I'm saying it is.

Don't forget, you said this to my observation that your takes were fairly lame: "YOU will never admit that "IF" Kyle did in fact point that weapon at people and was NOT being attacked when he did it was committting a crime."

You said that, and I agreed with you. Why you getting so riled up?

I'm not sure I see the point you're trying to make with which side introduced certain pieves of evidence. Just as the prosecution found out that their witness can turn out to be a fabulous witness for the defense, what difference it makes about which side introduced evidence? If the evidence points toward Kyle being innocent (or guilty) does it matter?

"PAY ATTENTION: It would be self defense as long as Kyle did not point the weapon at people BEFORE being chased down."

Whoa... talk about triggered. Maybe you should look into some trigger discipline?

I read the rest of your post, but you're clearly too triggered to communicate calmly. Maybe you've calmed down by now, and can post something with a tiny bit less triggered rage?

Lolol the only people here who refuse to be rational are you and every other right winger who hates any facts that expose them for the massive hypocrites they are.

We used to think Democrats were bad. But you people? You have outpaced them

There are many things we actually agree with right wingers about sadly you and they are now so obsessed with the Twiglight Zone you have created there is very little use speaking with you

You and the rest actually get triggered by people who agree LOLOL

Factual lies 🤨

Sure thing guy

I’m not your guy, pal.

Lololol triggered by an expression LOLOL

It looks like you just self triggered. I was just quoting Southpark buddy.

Sure thing guy

He's not your guy, wench.

I know I am going to regret this.. but, who is "ashli" , you keep bringing up on every single post ?

He brings her up on every single post because as a troll, he has no other tools in his toolbox.

oh, I was just wondering what the connection was with the rittenhouse case.. or what was the connection to the "let's go Brandon" slogan CNN started. I thought I was missing something because it seems like everyone is ignoring those comments you make.

Well, are you saying that Ashli was killed justly , and in turn you support Kyle's actions of killing the two ? I am not getting your logic here ..

This troll has no logic. Just a troll.

its just it seems like he keeps trying to justify The guy's action that killed Ashli , so if that is the case he has to support rittenhouse then.. , every post stutter makes pretty much involves the name ashli - I guess I just am trying to pick his brain.