Direct result of dumbing down of America

Actually, the prop gun was real. It’s the ammo that’s supposed to be fake.

Fact! Here's a good explanation from a reputable source for those that do not speak guns.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59006905

Naw! You jest in good sport about the BBC being a reputable source....I stopped looking at that media for over a decade now since it went full leftward ho!

That's kinda the point chum. Libs won't attack a source that is liberal.

That's the MO of those sealions - ask for a source. When a source is provided, attack the source. Example "OMG I can't believe that you think I'd believe anything from FOX News (or insert any other source here)."

That's the game, no source is ever good enough, like we're submitting our doctorial thesis or in a court of law here, not making memes for lulz.

I completely agree....I was being tongue-in-cheek....

Particularly a revolver.

The armorer, the Assistant Director who took the gun from the armorer and gave it to the actor, and the actor who pulled the trigger are all negligent. When it comes to safety you check and double check. If I am the camera operator on the business end of that gun, I would’ve insisted on checking myself to see if the gun was properly loaded with blanks. There were no mistakes, Only complete disregard for safety. All three should be charged with manslaughter and a jury should decide guilt.

Comes out now that there were live rounds in the gun. (See the source that I provided above, lives rounds are distinctly different from blanks.) In Baldwin's defense, live rounds have no business on a movie set with guns that can fire them. If you need to make it look as if someone or something is getting shot then you use squibs.

That being said, it doesn't absolve Baldwin. Again, had he looked he could easily see the visual difference between a blank and a live round.