Imgflip Logo Icon

If you care about babies, then you're pro-vaxx: Delta is killing pregnant women

If you care about babies, then you're pro-vaxx: Delta is killing pregnant women | I'm just not convinced about the vaccine . . . maybe I'll campaign against abortion! Do I have a baby shower or a death watch? | image tagged in memes,i bet he's thinking about other women,covid-19,vaccine,death | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
177 views 1 upvote Made by Lyoll 4 years ago in politics
I Bet He's Thinking About Other Women memeCaption this Meme
18 Comments
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
File this under more stupid lying bullshit.
1 up, 4y
Nope.
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
You don't just get to call it a lie and then say, "but MSM!" More than 100 pregnant women have died (all unvaccinated), and the deaths of viable fetuses (between 20 weeks and full term) have doubled in certain parts of the country.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
I'm just curious, do you understand that the media is just completely making up stories to sell covid panic? The story about Oklahoma ERs overwhelmed by ivermectin overdoses? That was completely made up. The story of Alabama (I think) doctor watching young people die of covid saying "I wish I'd gotten the vaccine"? Completely made up.

They are constantly lying.
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Some media outlets lie sometimes, others (OANN, Fox) lie a lot. But at least there are some regulations. Sources you find on YouTube, Facebook, et al are almost completely unregulated and unreliable. So if you find a news story that seems unlikely, confirm it with other reliable (and yes, MSM) media sources.

I agree that there's no proven basis for that OK Ivermectin story, but you also don't see me pushing it. However, you seem to have taken the message that the media is unreliable SOMETIMES and read that as ALL THE TIME, to your detriment.

This is what Putin wants you to believe.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
“ confirm it with other reliable (and yes, MSM) media sources. ”

Cool, which ones would you recommend that did not, for instance, viciously defame Nicholas Sandmann for standing there and smiling?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You keep mentioning him. If he is your standard for every possible media circumstance, you may have lost perspective.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Yes, I mention him because it only took the most cursory investigation to find out that, at least, there was more to the story. But all these news outlets were so excited to have a “hate whitey” story that they couldn’t even do that.

I notice you failed to answer the question.

Ooh! Here’s another one: Which one of your “reliable” sources showed skepticism from the outset about Jussie Smollett’s obvious bulls—t story? Any of them? Or did they just run with it because, once again, hate whitey?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Honestly, I never read that story. Since it matters to you, I suggest that you read up on it and evaluate the major news outlets' take on it.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
So you have no defense of them. Nothing. But you expect me to believe these people who have a clear history of malicious lies because…reasons.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I'd bother with a defense . . . when they stand accused in a neutral court, which you are not. You have also repeatedly refused to give your alternate credible, accredited news sources.
0 ups, 4y
Oh, and *you* are neutral and unbiased? Just like CNN and the New York Times, right?
1 up, 4y
1 up, 4y
Yes, I can. They have lied about so much, their credibility is completely burned. If they said the sky is blue, I would now have to go outside & check.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
By using the word, but not telling you they are changing the definition, they are being deceptive, in other words dishonest. As far as I’m concerned, Fauci has no credibility.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
So, the definition changed, but not in what seems like an internally inconsistent way.

The thing that science does, which I understand makes you uncomfortable, is constantly changing what is known and understood about the world. Personally, I'm kind of excited that we're developing anything to prevent/ immunize/ or limit susceptibility to corona viruses -- maybe we'll see an end to the common cold. Would you quibble if you could get a shot and never experience that again?
1 up, 4y
You said “Personally, I'm kind of excited that we're developing …..”. You should be MORTIFIED that after scientists spoke up that gain of function research was too dangerous and the Obama admin said to stop doing it, that Fauci and his co-conspirators publicly said doing gain of function was worth risking a pandemic. The documentation, furthermore, indicates they went around the rules to continue gain of function research that appears to have led to this pandemic. These people feel so full of themselves they would risk millions of lives. And millions have died.
The definition of a vaccine did not change by itself. People trying to cover their ass for a medical product that is defective and associated with those who created the pandemic are the ones who arbitrarily changed the definition. Nobody whoever got a vaccine for polio or smallpox ever subsequently got polio or small pox. Can’t say the the same about the covid “jab”.
Also, among healthy people under 65years old the disease is +99.5% survivable. And for those other people inexpensive, effective treatment DOES exist.
1 up, 4y
https://abcnews.go.com/US/mississippi-health-officials-plea-vaccination-significant-number-covid/story?id=79931539
I Bet He's Thinking About Other Women memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • pregnant hormonal
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    I'm just not convinced about the vaccine . . . maybe I'll campaign against abortion! Do I have a baby shower or a death watch?