I have read up on the "evidence" about Hunter, and it's always this deeply tainted "chain" of evidence.
It's so wildly unbelievable. A guy drops off a laptop in Delaware to the one legally blind repair guy. The repair guy who can't identify that it was Hunter and his video surveillance JUST HAPPENS to have failed that day so there's no video? And he doesn't have the laptop anymore, just the image of the hard disk? OH, and he's also a Trump supporter?
And then a drug dealer kept that laptop for years and years? And didn't sell it? Or wipe the hard drive, thus erasing evidence of theft, and using it themselves? Or giving it away (and wiping it then too).
You find that reasonable?